diff options
author | John McCall <rjmccall@apple.com> | 2009-10-18 09:09:24 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | John McCall <rjmccall@apple.com> | 2009-10-18 09:09:24 +0000 |
commit | 49a832bd499d6f61c23655f1fac99f0dd229756e (patch) | |
tree | ddf407322f3e10a390fe7a1331cfb44b4ac3b0c0 /lib/Sema/Sema.cpp | |
parent | 6800b334e5390452c6f921dbb832dfbfce371359 (diff) |
When performing template-substitution into a type, don't just replace the
TemplateTypeParmType with the substituted type directly; instead, replace it
with a SubstTemplateTypeParmType which will note that the type was originally
written as a template type parameter. This makes it reasonable to preserve
source information even through template substitution.
Also define the new SubstTemplateTypeParmType class, obviously.
For consistency with current behavior, we stringize these types as if they
were the underlying type. I'm not sure this is the right thing to do.
At any rate, I paled at adding yet another clause to the don't-desugar 'if'
statement, so I extracted a function to do it. The new function also does
The Right Thing more often, I think: e.g. if we have a chain of typedefs
leading to a vector type, we will now desugar all but the last one.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@84412 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Sema/Sema.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Sema/Sema.cpp | 128 |
1 files changed, 100 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp b/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp index 9061576f81..5d5a57632f 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp @@ -23,6 +23,101 @@ #include "clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h" using namespace clang; +/// Determines whether we should have an a.k.a. clause when +/// pretty-printing a type. There are two main criteria: +/// +/// 1) Some types provide very minimal sugar that doesn't impede the +/// user's understanding --- for example, elaborated type +/// specifiers. If this is all the sugar we see, we don't want an +/// a.k.a. clause. +/// 2) Some types are technically sugared but are much more familiar +/// when seen in their sugared form --- for example, va_list, +/// vector types, and the magic Objective C types. We don't +/// want to desugar these, even if we do produce an a.k.a. clause. +static bool ShouldAKA(ASTContext &Context, QualType QT, + QualType& DesugaredQT) { + + bool AKA = false; + QualifierCollector Qc; + + while (true) { + const Type *Ty = Qc.strip(QT); + + // Don't aka just because we saw an elaborated type... + if (isa<ElaboratedType>(Ty)) { + QT = cast<ElaboratedType>(Ty)->desugar(); + continue; + } + + // ...or a qualified name type... + if (isa<QualifiedNameType>(Ty)) { + QT = cast<QualifiedNameType>(Ty)->desugar(); + continue; + } + + // ...or a substituted template type parameter. + if (isa<SubstTemplateTypeParmType>(Ty)) { + QT = cast<SubstTemplateTypeParmType>(Ty)->desugar(); + continue; + } + + // Don't desugar template specializations. + if (isa<TemplateSpecializationType>(Ty)) + break; + + // Don't desugar magic Objective-C types. + if (QualType(Ty,0) == Context.getObjCIdType() || + QualType(Ty,0) == Context.getObjCClassType() || + QualType(Ty,0) == Context.getObjCSelType() || + QualType(Ty,0) == Context.getObjCProtoType()) + break; + + // Don't desugar va_list. + if (QualType(Ty,0) == Context.getBuiltinVaListType()) + break; + + // Otherwise, do a single-step desugar. + QualType Underlying; + bool IsSugar = false; + switch (Ty->getTypeClass()) { +#define ABSTRACT_TYPE(Class, Base) +#define TYPE(Class, Base) \ + case Type::Class: { \ + const Class##Type *CTy = cast<Class##Type>(Ty); \ + if (CTy->isSugared()) { \ + IsSugar = true; \ + Underlying = CTy->desugar(); \ + } \ + break; \ + } +#include "clang/AST/TypeNodes.def" + } + + // If it wasn't sugared, we're done. + if (!IsSugar) + break; + + // If the desugared type is a vector type, we don't want to expand + // it, it will turn into an attribute mess. People want their "vec4". + if (isa<VectorType>(Underlying)) + break; + + // Otherwise, we're tearing through something opaque; note that + // we'll eventually need an a.k.a. clause and keep going. + AKA = true; + QT = Underlying; + continue; + } + + // If we ever tore through opaque sugar + if (AKA) { + DesugaredQT = Qc.apply(QT); + return true; + } + + return false; +} + /// \brief Convert the given type to a string suitable for printing as part of /// a diagnostic. /// @@ -33,34 +128,11 @@ static std::string ConvertTypeToDiagnosticString(ASTContext &Context, // FIXME: Playing with std::string is really slow. std::string S = Ty.getAsString(Context.PrintingPolicy); - // If this is a sugared type (like a typedef, typeof, etc), then unwrap one - // level of the sugar so that the type is more obvious to the user. - QualType DesugaredTy = Ty.getDesugaredType(); - - if (Ty != DesugaredTy && - // If the desugared type is a vector type, we don't want to expand it, - // it will turn into an attribute mess. People want their "vec4". - !isa<VectorType>(DesugaredTy) && - - // Don't aka just because we saw an elaborated type... - (!isa<ElaboratedType>(Ty) || - cast<ElaboratedType>(Ty)->desugar() != DesugaredTy) && - - // ...or a qualified name type... - (!isa<QualifiedNameType>(Ty) || - cast<QualifiedNameType>(Ty)->desugar() != DesugaredTy) && - - // ...or a non-dependent template specialization. - (!isa<TemplateSpecializationType>(Ty) || Ty->isDependentType()) && - - // Don't desugar magic Objective-C types. - Ty.getUnqualifiedType() != Context.getObjCIdType() && - Ty.getUnqualifiedType() != Context.getObjCClassType() && - Ty.getUnqualifiedType() != Context.getObjCSelType() && - Ty.getUnqualifiedType() != Context.getObjCProtoType() && - - // Not va_list. - Ty.getUnqualifiedType() != Context.getBuiltinVaListType()) { + // Consider producing an a.k.a. clause if removing all the direct + // sugar gives us something "significantly different". + + QualType DesugaredTy; + if (ShouldAKA(Context, Ty, DesugaredTy)) { S = "'"+S+"' (aka '"; S += DesugaredTy.getAsString(Context.PrintingPolicy); S += "')"; |