diff options
author | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2010-04-21 00:45:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2010-04-21 00:45:42 +0000 |
commit | 04badcf84c8d504d8491c7c7e29b58f52cb16640 (patch) | |
tree | 99dc6c7a506db47b8d998c0fa9807f10f770db34 /lib/Checker/CallAndMessageChecker.cpp | |
parent | 10dc0f8c355c6a726f206aefcb249cb2fafbce17 (diff) |
Overhaul the AST representation of Objective-C message send
expressions, to improve source-location information, clarify the
actual receiver of the message, and pave the way for proper C++
support. The ObjCMessageExpr node represents four different kinds of
message sends in a single AST node:
1) Send to a object instance described by an expression (e.g., [x method:5])
2) Send to a class described by the class name (e.g., [NSString method:5])
3) Send to a superclass class (e.g, [super method:5] in class method)
4) Send to a superclass instance (e.g., [super method:5] in instance method)
Previously these four cases where tangled together. Now, they have
more distinct representations. Specific changes:
1) Unchanged; the object instance is represented by an Expr*.
2) Previously stored the ObjCInterfaceDecl* referring to the class
receiving the message. Now stores a TypeSourceInfo* so that we know
how the class was spelled. This both maintains typedef information
and opens the door for more complicated C++ types (e.g., dependent
types). There was an alternative, unused representation of these
sends by naming the class via an IdentifierInfo *. In practice, we
either had an ObjCInterfaceDecl *, from which we would get the
IdentifierInfo *, or we fell into the case below...
3) Previously represented by a class message whose IdentifierInfo *
referred to "super". Sema and CodeGen would use isStr("super") to
determine if they had a send to super. Now represented as a
"class super" send, where we have both the location of the "super"
keyword and the ObjCInterfaceDecl* of the superclass we're
targetting (statically).
4) Previously represented by an instance message whose receiver is a
an ObjCSuperExpr, which Sema and CodeGen would check for via
isa<ObjCSuperExpr>(). Now represented as an "instance super" send,
where we have both the location of the "super" keyword and the
ObjCInterfaceDecl* of the superclass we're targetting
(statically). Note that ObjCSuperExpr only has one remaining use in
the AST, which is for "super.prop" references.
The new representation of ObjCMessageExpr is 2 pointers smaller than
the old one, since it combines more storage. It also eliminates a leak
when we loaded message-send expressions from a precompiled header. The
representation also feels much cleaner to me; comments welcome!
This patch attempts to maintain the same semantics we previously had
with Objective-C message sends. In several places, there are massive
changes that boil down to simply replacing a nested-if structure such
as:
if (message has a receiver expression) {
// instance message
if (isa<ObjCSuperExpr>(...)) {
// send to super
} else {
// send to an object
}
} else {
// class message
if (name->isStr("super")) {
// class send to super
} else {
// send to class
}
}
with a switch
switch (E->getReceiverKind()) {
case ObjCMessageExpr::SuperInstance: ...
case ObjCMessageExpr::Instance: ...
case ObjCMessageExpr::SuperClass: ...
case ObjCMessageExpr::Class:...
}
There are quite a few places (particularly in the checkers) where
send-to-super is effectively ignored. I've placed FIXMEs in most of
them, and attempted to address send-to-super in a reasonable way. This
could use some review.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@101972 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Checker/CallAndMessageChecker.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Checker/CallAndMessageChecker.cpp | 12 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Checker/CallAndMessageChecker.cpp b/lib/Checker/CallAndMessageChecker.cpp index ce9f26ec69..9d0dc33395 100644 --- a/lib/Checker/CallAndMessageChecker.cpp +++ b/lib/Checker/CallAndMessageChecker.cpp @@ -218,7 +218,8 @@ void CallAndMessageChecker::PreVisitObjCMessageExpr(CheckerContext &C, const GRState *state = C.getState(); - if (const Expr *receiver = ME->getReceiver()) + // FIXME: Handle 'super'? + if (const Expr *receiver = ME->getInstanceReceiver()) if (state->getSVal(receiver).isUndef()) { if (ExplodedNode *N = C.GenerateSink()) { if (!BT_msg_undef) @@ -265,10 +266,11 @@ void CallAndMessageChecker::EmitNilReceiverBug(CheckerContext &C, << ME->getType().getAsString() << "' that will be garbage"; EnhancedBugReport *report = new EnhancedBugReport(*BT_msg_ret, os.str(), N); - const Expr *receiver = ME->getReceiver(); - report->addRange(receiver->getSourceRange()); - report->addVisitorCreator(bugreporter::registerTrackNullOrUndefValue, - receiver); + if (const Expr *receiver = ME->getInstanceReceiver()) { + report->addRange(receiver->getSourceRange()); + report->addVisitorCreator(bugreporter::registerTrackNullOrUndefValue, + receiver); + } C.EmitReport(report); } |