Backout of r59196, plus a new ICE test. Sorry if this is a

little rude; I figure it's cleaner to just back this out now so 
it doesn't get forgotten or mixed up with other checkins.

The modification to isICE is simply wrong; I've added a test that the 
change to isICE breaks.

I'm pretty sure the modification to tryEvaluate is also wrong.  
At the very least, there's some serious miscommunication going on here, 
as this is going in exactly the opposite direction of r59105.  My 
understanding is that tryEvaluate is not supposed to care about side 
effects.  That said, a lot of the clients to tryEvaluate are 
expecting it to enforce a no-side-effects policy, so we probably need 
another method that provides that guarantee.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@59212 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 32 deletions

diff --git a/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp b/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
index f5477f30b3..d6a4094520 100644
--- a/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
+++ b/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
@@ -376,7 +376,6 @@ public:
   }
   bool VisitDeclRefExpr(const DeclRefExpr *E);
   bool VisitCallExpr(const CallExpr *E);
-  bool VisitBinOpComma(const BinaryOperator *E);
   bool VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *E);
   bool VisitUnaryOperator(const UnaryOperator *E);
 
@@ -481,37 +480,7 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitCallExpr(const CallExpr *E) {
   }
 }
 
-bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBinOpComma(const BinaryOperator *E) {
-  llvm::APSInt RHS(32);
-
-  // Require that we be able to evaluate the LHS.
-  if (!E->getLHS()->isEvaluatable(Info.Ctx))
-    return false;
-
-  bool OldEval = Info.isEvaluated;
-  if (!EvaluateInteger(E->getRHS(), RHS, Info))
-    return false;
-  Info.isEvaluated = OldEval;
-
-  // Result of the comma is just the result of the RHS.
-  Result = RHS;
-  
-  // C99 6.6p3: "shall not contain assignment, ..., or comma operators,
-  // *except* when they are contained within a subexpression that is not
-  // evaluated".  Note that Assignment can never happen due to constraints
-  // on the LHS subexpr, so we don't need to check it here.
-  if (!Info.isEvaluated)
-    return true;
-
-  // If the value is evaluated, we can accept it as an extension.
-  return Extension(E->getOperatorLoc(), diag::ext_comma_in_constant_expr);
-}
-
 bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *E) {
-  // Comma operator requires special handling.
-  if (E->getOpcode() == BinaryOperator::Comma)
-    return VisitBinOpComma(E);
-  
   // The LHS of a constant expr is always evaluated and needed.
   llvm::APSInt RHS(32);
   if (!Visit(E->getLHS())) {
@@ -616,7 +585,22 @@ bool IntExprEvaluator::VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *E) {
     Result = Result != 0 || RHS != 0;
     Result.zextOrTrunc(getIntTypeSizeInBits(E->getType()));
     break;
-}
+      
+    
+  case BinaryOperator::Comma:
+    // Result of the comma is just the result of the RHS.
+    Result = RHS;
+
+    // C99 6.6p3: "shall not contain assignment, ..., or comma operators,
+    // *except* when they are contained within a subexpression that is not
+    // evaluated".  Note that Assignment can never happen due to constraints
+    // on the LHS subexpr, so we don't need to check it here.
+    if (!Info.isEvaluated)
+      return true;
+      
+    // If the value is evaluated, we can accept it as an extension.
+    return Extension(E->getOperatorLoc(), diag::ext_comma_in_constant_expr);
+  }
 
   Result.setIsUnsigned(E->getType()->isUnsignedIntegerType());
   return true;