Reinstate the introduction of source-location information for

nested-name-speciciers within elaborated type names, e.g.,
 
  enum clang::NestedNameSpecifier::SpecifierKind

Fixes in this iteration include:

  (1) Compute the type-source range properly for a dependent template
  specialization type that starts with "template template-id ::", as
  in a member access expression

    dep->template f<T>::f()

  This is a latent bug I triggered with this change (because now we're
  checking the computed source ranges for dependent template
  specialization types). But the real problem was...

  (2) Make sure to set the qualifier range on a dependent template
  specialization type appropriately. This will go away once we push
  nested-name-specifier locations into dependent template
  specialization types, but it was the source of the
  valgrind errors on the buildbots.
  



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@126765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 24 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h b/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h
index a724f29fb0..591af2a02f 100644
--- a/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h
+++ b/include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h
@@ -1388,7 +1388,10 @@ class AutoTypeLoc : public InheritingConcreteTypeLoc<TypeSpecTypeLoc,
 
 struct ElaboratedLocInfo {
   SourceLocation KeywordLoc;
-  SourceRange QualifierRange;
+  
+  /// \brief Opaque data pointer used to reconstruct a nested-name-specifier
+  /// from 
+  void *QualifierData;
 };
 
 class ElaboratedTypeLoc : public ConcreteTypeLoc<UnqualTypeLoc,
@@ -1403,27 +1406,29 @@ public:
     this->getLocalData()->KeywordLoc = Loc;
   }
 
-  SourceRange getQualifierRange() const {
-    return this->getLocalData()->QualifierRange;
+  NestedNameSpecifierLoc getQualifierLoc() const {
+    return NestedNameSpecifierLoc(getTypePtr()->getQualifier(), 
+                                  getLocalData()->QualifierData);
   }
-  void setQualifierRange(SourceRange Range) {
-    this->getLocalData()->QualifierRange = Range;
+ 
+  void setQualifierLoc(NestedNameSpecifierLoc QualifierLoc) {
+    assert(QualifierLoc.getNestedNameSpecifier() 
+                                            == getTypePtr()->getQualifier() &&
+           "Inconsistent nested-name-specifier pointer");
+    getLocalData()->QualifierData = QualifierLoc.getOpaqueData();
   }
 
   SourceRange getLocalSourceRange() const {
     if (getKeywordLoc().isValid())
-      if (getQualifierRange().getEnd().isValid())
-        return SourceRange(getKeywordLoc(), getQualifierRange().getEnd());
+      if (getQualifierLoc())
+        return SourceRange(getKeywordLoc(), getQualifierLoc().getEndLoc());
       else
         return SourceRange(getKeywordLoc());
     else
-      return getQualifierRange();
+      return getQualifierLoc().getSourceRange();
   }
 
-  void initializeLocal(ASTContext &Context, SourceLocation Loc) {
-    setKeywordLoc(Loc);
-    setQualifierRange(SourceRange(Loc));
-  }
+  void initializeLocal(ASTContext &Context, SourceLocation Loc);
 
   TypeLoc getNamedTypeLoc() const {
     return getInnerTypeLoc();
@@ -1496,9 +1501,10 @@ public:
   void initializeLocal(ASTContext &Context, SourceLocation Loc);
 };
 
-// This is exactly the structure of an ElaboratedTypeLoc whose inner
-// type is some sort of TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc.
-struct DependentTemplateSpecializationLocInfo : DependentNameLocInfo {
+struct DependentTemplateSpecializationLocInfo {
+  SourceLocation KeywordLoc;
+  SourceLocation NameLoc;
+  SourceRange QualifierRange;
   SourceLocation LAngleLoc;
   SourceLocation RAngleLoc;
   // followed by a TemplateArgumentLocInfo[]
@@ -1563,8 +1569,10 @@ public:
   SourceRange getLocalSourceRange() const {
     if (getKeywordLoc().isValid())
       return SourceRange(getKeywordLoc(), getRAngleLoc());
-    else
+    else if (getQualifierRange().isValid())
       return SourceRange(getQualifierRange().getBegin(), getRAngleLoc());
+    else
+      return SourceRange(getNameLoc(), getRAngleLoc());
   }
 
   void copy(DependentTemplateSpecializationTypeLoc Loc) {