Improve recovery in a wonky case where one tries to specialize a

template template parameter.

When building a template-id type, check whether the template-name
itself is dependent (even if the template arguments are not!) and
handle it as a template-id type.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@86913 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

3 files changed, 19 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index 26693aa78c..2cc29caa01 100644
--- a/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -1012,6 +1012,9 @@ def err_template_spec_friend : Error<
 def err_template_spec_default_arg : Error<
   "default argument not permitted on an explicit "
   "%select{instantiation|specialization}0 of function %1">;
+def err_not_class_template_specialization : Error<
+  "cannot specialize a %select{dependent template|template template "
+  "parameter}0">;
 
 // C++ class template specializations and out-of-line definitions
 def err_template_spec_needs_header : Error<
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 9305d6ebb1..419347adcf 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -1188,7 +1188,9 @@ QualType Sema::CheckTemplateIdType(TemplateName Name,
 
   if (TemplateSpecializationType::anyDependentTemplateArguments(
                                                       TemplateArgs,
-                                                      NumTemplateArgs)) {
+                                                      NumTemplateArgs) ||
+      isa<TemplateTemplateParmDecl>(Template) || 
+      Template->getDeclContext()->isDependentContext()) {
     // This class template specialization is a dependent
     // type. Therefore, its canonical type is another class template
     // specialization type that contains all of the converted
@@ -2935,7 +2937,14 @@ Sema::ActOnClassTemplateSpecialization(Scope *S, unsigned TagSpec,
   // Find the class template we're specializing
   TemplateName Name = TemplateD.getAsVal<TemplateName>();
   ClassTemplateDecl *ClassTemplate
-    = cast<ClassTemplateDecl>(Name.getAsTemplateDecl());
+    = dyn_cast_or_null<ClassTemplateDecl>(Name.getAsTemplateDecl());
+
+  if (!ClassTemplate) {
+    Diag(TemplateNameLoc, diag::err_not_class_template_specialization)
+      << (Name.getAsTemplateDecl() && 
+          isa<TemplateTemplateParmDecl>(Name.getAsTemplateDecl()));
+    return true;
+  }
 
   bool isExplicitSpecialization = false;
   bool isPartialSpecialization = false;
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/class-template-spec.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/class-template-spec.cpp
index 4cd43b469a..5bc9a6cd67 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/class-template-spec.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/class-template-spec.cpp
@@ -104,3 +104,8 @@ Foo<int>* v;
 Foo<int>& F() { return *v; }
 template <typename T> class Foo {};
 Foo<int> x;
+
+
+// Template template parameters
+template<template<class T> class Wibble>
+class Wibble<int> { }; // expected-error{{cannot specialize a template template parameter}}