diff options
author | dbrownell <dbrownell@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60> | 2009-09-21 00:04:35 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | dbrownell <dbrownell@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60> | 2009-09-21 00:04:35 +0000 |
commit | d20103cd93641bca44f737b45004f495cb24a27f (patch) | |
tree | c289f34c42a9d8d438f27508a929e81056dcb145 /src | |
parent | 48e96a18eddc73c1affccb2c397e044e09678095 (diff) |
Update the jtag-examine_chain() logic to verify that there's no
garbage after the expected data (from the TAPs' BYPASS or IDCODE
registers).
NOTE that there was previously some code that looked like it was
trying to do this ... which didn't work, because it was looping
over the list of expected TAPs, and never checked *after* that
list completed! That could hide some *nasty* reset issues...
Also replace a now-obsolete scanchain length test with one that
behaves correctly; and update reporting of unexpected IDCODEs.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2739 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/jtag/core.c | 77 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/src/jtag/core.c b/src/jtag/core.c index bf4a9cc7..f9ebb3fa 100644 --- a/src/jtag/core.c +++ b/src/jtag/core.c @@ -837,13 +837,18 @@ void jtag_sleep(uint32_t us) alive_sleep(us/1000); } -/// maximum number of JTAG devices expected in the chain +/* Maximum number of enabled JTAG devices we expect in the scan chain, + * plus one (to detect garbage at the end). Devices that don't support + * IDCODE take up fewer bits, possibly allowing a few more devices. + */ #define JTAG_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE 20 #define EXTRACT_MFG(X) (((X) & 0xffe) >> 1) #define EXTRACT_PART(X) (((X) & 0xffff000) >> 12) #define EXTRACT_VER(X) (((X) & 0xf0000000) >> 28) +#define END_OF_CHAIN_FLAG 0x000000ff + static int jtag_examine_chain_execute(uint8_t *idcode_buffer, unsigned num_idcode) { scan_field_t field = { @@ -855,7 +860,7 @@ static int jtag_examine_chain_execute(uint8_t *idcode_buffer, unsigned num_idcod // initialize to the end of chain ID value for (unsigned i = 0; i < JTAG_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE; i++) - buf_set_u32(idcode_buffer, i * 32, 32, 0x000000FF); + buf_set_u32(idcode_buffer, i * 32, 32, END_OF_CHAIN_FLAG); jtag_add_plain_dr_scan(1, &field, TAP_DRPAUSE); jtag_add_tlr(); @@ -899,7 +904,12 @@ static void jtag_examine_chain_display(enum log_levels level, const char *msg, static bool jtag_idcode_is_final(uint32_t idcode) { - return idcode == 0x000000FF || idcode == 0xFFFFFFFF; + /* + * Some devices, such as AVR8, will output all 1's instead + * of TDI input value at end of chain. Allow those values + * instead of failing. + */ + return idcode == END_OF_CHAIN_FLAG || idcode == 0xFFFFFFFF; } /** @@ -907,8 +917,9 @@ static bool jtag_idcode_is_final(uint32_t idcode) * all as expected, but a single JTAG device requires only 64 bits to be * read back correctly. This can help identify and diagnose problems * with the JTAG chain earlier, gives more helpful/explicit error messages. + * Returns TRUE iff garbage was found. */ -static void jtag_examine_chain_end(uint8_t *idcodes, unsigned count, unsigned max) +static bool jtag_examine_chain_end(uint8_t *idcodes, unsigned count, unsigned max) { bool triggered = false; for (; count < max - 31; count += 32) @@ -921,19 +932,14 @@ static void jtag_examine_chain_end(uint8_t *idcodes, unsigned count, unsigned ma count, (unsigned int)idcode); triggered = true; } + return triggered; } static bool jtag_examine_chain_match_tap(const struct jtag_tap_s *tap) { - if (0 == tap->expected_ids_cnt) - { - /// @todo Enable LOG_INFO to ask for reports about unknown TAP IDs. -#if 0 - LOG_INFO("Uknown JTAG TAP ID: 0x%08x", tap->idcode) - LOG_INFO("Please report the chip name and reported ID code to the openocd project"); -#endif + /* ignore expected BYPASS codes; warn otherwise */ + if (0 == tap->expected_ids_cnt && !tap->idcode) return true; - } /* Loop over the expected identification codes and test for a match */ uint8_t ii; @@ -944,7 +950,7 @@ static bool jtag_examine_chain_match_tap(const struct jtag_tap_s *tap) } /* If none of the expected ids matched, log an error */ - jtag_examine_chain_display(LOG_LVL_ERROR, "got", + jtag_examine_chain_display(LOG_LVL_ERROR, "UNEXPECTED", tap->dotted_name, tap->idcode); for (ii = 0; ii < tap->expected_ids_cnt; ii++) { @@ -962,10 +968,12 @@ static bool jtag_examine_chain_match_tap(const struct jtag_tap_s *tap) static int jtag_examine_chain(void) { uint8_t idcode_buffer[JTAG_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE * 4]; - unsigned device_count = 0; + unsigned bit_count; + /* DR scan to collect BYPASS or IDCODE register contents. + * Then make sure the scan data has both ones and zeroes. + */ jtag_examine_chain_execute(idcode_buffer, JTAG_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE); - if (!jtag_examine_chain_check(idcode_buffer, JTAG_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE)) return ERROR_JTAG_INIT_FAILED; @@ -977,7 +985,7 @@ static int jtag_examine_chain(void) return ERROR_JTAG_INIT_FAILED; } - for (unsigned bit_count = 0; + for (bit_count = 0; tap && bit_count < (JTAG_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE * 32) - 31; tap = jtag_tap_next_enabled(tap)) { @@ -995,26 +1003,13 @@ static int jtag_examine_chain(void) } else { + /* Friendly devices support IDCODE */ tap->hasidcode = true; - - /* - * End of chain (invalid manufacturer ID) some devices, such - * as AVR will output all 1's instead of TDI input value at - * end of chain. - */ - if (jtag_idcode_is_final(idcode)) - { - jtag_examine_chain_end(idcode_buffer, - bit_count + 32, JTAG_MAX_CHAIN_SIZE * 32); - break; - } - jtag_examine_chain_display(LOG_LVL_INFO, "tap/device found", tap->dotted_name, idcode); bit_count += 32; } - device_count++; tap->idcode = idcode; // ensure the TAP ID does matches what was expected @@ -1022,14 +1017,20 @@ static int jtag_examine_chain(void) return ERROR_JTAG_INIT_FAILED; } - /* see if number of discovered devices matches configuration */ - if (device_count != jtag_tap_count_enabled()) - { - LOG_ERROR("number of discovered devices in JTAG chain (%i) " - "does not match (enabled) configuration (%i), total taps: %d", - device_count, jtag_tap_count_enabled(), jtag_tap_count()); - LOG_ERROR("check the config file and ensure proper JTAG communication" - " (connections, speed, ...)"); + /* Fail if too many TAPs were enabled for us to verify them all. */ + if (tap) { + LOG_ERROR("Too many TAPs enabled; '%s' ignored.", + tap->dotted_name); + return ERROR_JTAG_INIT_FAILED; + } + + /* After those IDCODE or BYPASS register values should be + * only the data we fed into the scan chain. + */ + if (jtag_examine_chain_end(idcode_buffer, bit_count, + 8 * sizeof(idcode_buffer))) { + LOG_ERROR("double-check your JTAG setup (interface, " + "speed, TAPs, ...)"); return ERROR_JTAG_INIT_FAILED; } |