From 1784d160e4efa75782884d451d0788b9457e67dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dale Johannesen Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:55:36 +0000 Subject: The hasMemory argument is irrelevant to how the argument for an "i" constraint should get lowered; PR 6309. While this argument was passed around a lot, this is the only place it was used, so it goes away from a lot of other places. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106893 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp') diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp index f0cc6f7c5d..7b050e35ef 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.cpp @@ -401,8 +401,7 @@ static bool IsOperandAMemoryOperand(CallInst *CI, InlineAsm *IA, Value *OpVal, } // Compute the constraint code and ConstraintType to use. - TLI.ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, SDValue(), - OpInfo.ConstraintType == TargetLowering::C_Memory); + TLI.ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, SDValue()); // If this asm operand is our Value*, and if it isn't an indirect memory // operand, we can't fold it! -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258