| Age | Commit message (Expand) | Author |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-08-27 | no really, fix the test. | Chris Lattner |
| 2010-08-27 | fix this test. It's not clear what it's really testing. | Chris Lattner |
| 2009-10-12 | allow this testcase to pass with recent changes. The test hasn't been | Chris Lattner |
| 2009-06-23 | This test only works on ppc32 if some optimization is done before | Dale Johannesen |
| 2009-01-16 | This is now passing. | Evan Cheng |
| 2009-01-13 | Mark this XFAIL for the moment. | Duncan Sands |
| 2009-01-12 | Second test is only valid in 32-bit mode. | Evan Cheng |
| 2009-01-12 | Test for r62076. | Evan Cheng |
| 2009-01-09 | this doesn't depend on the gcc early inliner anymore. | Chris Lattner |
| 2009-01-09 | PR3290 is now fixed. | Chris Lattner |
| 2008-12-31 | XFAIL test caused by r61493. Apparently, this is expected? | Bill Wendling |
| 2008-05-29 | For PR1338: Rename test dirs | Anton Korobeynikov |
 |
index : llvm | |
| http://llvm.org | git repository hosting |
| aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |