Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
... which tickled the lowerinvoke pass because it used the BCE routines.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@12012 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
and br->br code and generalizing it. This allows us to compile code like this:
int test(Instruction *I) {
if (isa<CastInst>(I))
return foo(7);
else if (isa<BranchInst>(I))
return foo(123);
else if (isa<UnwindInst>(I))
return foo(1241);
else if (isa<SetCondInst>(I))
return foo(1);
else if (isa<VAArgInst>(I))
return foo(42);
return foo(-1);
}
into:
int %_Z4testPN4llvm11InstructionE("struct.llvm::Instruction"* %I) {
entry:
%tmp.1.i.i.i.i.i.i.i = getelementptr "struct.llvm::Instruction"* %I, long 0, ubyte 4 ; <uint*> [#uses=1]
%tmp.2.i.i.i.i.i.i.i = load uint* %tmp.1.i.i.i.i.i.i.i ; <uint> [#uses=2]
%tmp.2.i.i.i.i.i.i = seteq uint %tmp.2.i.i.i.i.i.i.i, 27 ; <bool> [#uses=0]
switch uint %tmp.2.i.i.i.i.i.i.i, label %endif.0 [
uint 27, label %then.0
uint 2, label %then.1
uint 5, label %then.2
uint 14, label %then.3
uint 15, label %then.3
uint 16, label %then.3
uint 17, label %then.3
uint 18, label %then.3
uint 19, label %then.3
uint 32, label %then.4
]
...
As well as handling the cases in 176.gcc and many other programs more effectively.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11964 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Do not just inject a new prototype.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11951 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11939 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
function, as long as the loop isn't the only one in that function. This should
help debugging passes easier with BugPoint.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11936 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
a new function, taking care of inputs and outputs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11935 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
if (X == 0 || X == 2)
...where the comparisons and branches are in different blocks... into a switch
instruction. This comes up a lot in various programs, and works well with
the switch/switch merging code I checked earlier. For example, this testcase:
int switchtest(int C) {
return C == 0 ? f(123) :
C == 1 ? f(3123) :
C == 4 ? f(312) :
C == 5 ? f(1234): f(444);
}
is converted into this:
switch int %C, label %cond_false.3 [
int 0, label %cond_true.0
int 1, label %cond_true.1
int 4, label %cond_true.2
int 5, label %cond_true.3
]
instead of a whole bunch of conditional branches.
Admittedly the code is ugly, and incomplete. To be complete, we need to add
br -> switch merging and switch -> br merging. For example, this testcase:
struct foo { int Q, R, Z; };
#define A (X->Q+X->R * 123)
int test(struct foo *X) {
return A == 123 ? X1() :
A == 12321 ? X2():
(A == 111 || A == 222) ? X3() :
A == 875 ? X4() : X5();
}
Gets compiled to this:
switch int %tmp.7, label %cond_false.2 [
int 123, label %cond_true.0
int 12321, label %cond_true.1
int 111, label %cond_true.2
int 222, label %cond_true.2
]
...
cond_false.2: ; preds = %entry
%tmp.52 = seteq int %tmp.7, 875 ; <bool> [#uses=1]
br bool %tmp.52, label %cond_true.3, label %cond_false.3
where the branch could be folded into the switch.
This kind of thing occurs *ALL OF THE TIME*, especially in programs like
176.gcc, which is a horrible mess of code. It contains stuff like *shudder*:
#define SWITCH_TAKES_ARG(CHAR) \
( (CHAR) == 'D' \
|| (CHAR) == 'U' \
|| (CHAR) == 'o' \
|| (CHAR) == 'e' \
|| (CHAR) == 'u' \
|| (CHAR) == 'I' \
|| (CHAR) == 'm' \
|| (CHAR) == 'L' \
|| (CHAR) == 'A' \
|| (CHAR) == 'h' \
|| (CHAR) == 'z')
and
#define CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P(VALUE, C) \
((C) == 'I' ? SMALL_INTVAL (VALUE) \
: (C) == 'J' ? SMALL_INTVAL (-(VALUE)) \
: (C) == 'K' ? (unsigned)(VALUE) < 32 \
: (C) == 'L' ? ((VALUE) & 0xffff) == 0 \
: (C) == 'M' ? integer_ok_for_set (VALUE) \
: (C) == 'N' ? (VALUE) < 0 \
: (C) == 'O' ? (VALUE) == 0 \
: (C) == 'P' ? (VALUE) >= 0 \
: 0)
and
#define LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS(X,OLDX,MODE,WIN) \
{ \
if (GET_CODE (X) == PLUS && CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P (XEXP (X, 1))) \
(X) = gen_rtx (PLUS, SImode, XEXP (X, 0), \
copy_to_mode_reg (SImode, XEXP (X, 1))); \
if (GET_CODE (X) == PLUS && CONSTANT_ADDRESS_P (XEXP (X, 0))) \
(X) = gen_rtx (PLUS, SImode, XEXP (X, 1), \
copy_to_mode_reg (SImode, XEXP (X, 0))); \
if (GET_CODE (X) == PLUS && GET_CODE (XEXP (X, 0)) == MULT) \
(X) = gen_rtx (PLUS, SImode, XEXP (X, 1), \
force_operand (XEXP (X, 0), 0)); \
if (GET_CODE (X) == PLUS && GET_CODE (XEXP (X, 1)) == MULT) \
(X) = gen_rtx (PLUS, SImode, XEXP (X, 0), \
force_operand (XEXP (X, 1), 0)); \
if (GET_CODE (X) == PLUS && GET_CODE (XEXP (X, 0)) == PLUS) \
(X) = gen_rtx (PLUS, Pmode, force_operand (XEXP (X, 0), NULL_RTX),\
XEXP (X, 1)); \
if (GET_CODE (X) == PLUS && GET_CODE (XEXP (X, 1)) == PLUS) \
(X) = gen_rtx (PLUS, Pmode, XEXP (X, 0), \
force_operand (XEXP (X, 1), NULL_RTX)); \
if (GET_CODE (X) == SYMBOL_REF || GET_CODE (X) == CONST \
|| GET_CODE (X) == LABEL_REF) \
(X) = legitimize_address (flag_pic, X, 0, 0); \
if (memory_address_p (MODE, X)) \
goto WIN; }
and others. These macros get used multiple times of course. These are such
lovely candidates for macros, aren't they? :)
This code also nicely handles LLVM constructs that look like this:
if (isa<CastInst>(I))
...
else if (isa<BranchInst>(I))
...
else if (isa<SetCondInst>(I))
...
else if (isa<UnwindInst>(I))
...
else if (isa<VAArgInst>(I))
...
where the isa can obviously be a dyn_cast as well. Switch instructions are a
good thing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11870 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11821 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
This case occurs many times in various benchmarks, especially when combined
with the previous patch. This allows it to get stuff like:
if (X == 4 || X == 3)
if (X == 5 || X == 8)
and
switch (X) {
case 4: case 5: case 6:
if (X == 4 || X == 5)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11797 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11793 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
This turns code like this:
if (X == 4 | X == 7)
and
if (X != 4 & X != 7)
into switch instructions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11792 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11565 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
see the testcase for the reasoning.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11496 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
llvm.setjmp/llvm.longjmp intrinsics.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11482 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11474 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
allowed in invoke instructions. Thus, if we are inlining a call to an intrinsic
function into an invoke site, we don't need to turn the call into an invoke!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11384 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11376 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Having a proper 'select' instruction would allow the elimination of a lot
of the special case cruft in this patch, but we don't have one yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11307 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11301 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
occurs in the program.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11249 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11210 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
even if it is wierd in some way.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11207 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
'unwind' dest
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11202 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
This fixed PR16 "[lowerinvoke] The -lowerinvoke pass does not insert calls to setjmp/longjmp"
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11195 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
This causes the JIT, or LLC'd program to print out a nice message, explaining
WHY the program aborted.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11184 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
keeps finding more code motion opportunities now that the dominators are correct!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11142 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11140 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
The problem is that the dominator update code didn't "realize" that it's
possible for the newly inserted basic block to dominate anything. Because
it IS possible, stuff was getting updated wrong.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11137 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11123 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
1. Don't scan to the end of alloca instructions in the caller function to
insert inlined allocas, just insert at the top. This saves a lot of
time inlining into functions with a lot of allocas.
2. Use splice to move the alloca instructions over, instead of remove/insert.
This allows us to transfer a block at a time, and eliminates a bunch of
silly symbol table manipulations.
This speeds up the inliner on the testcase in PR209 from 1.73s -> 1.04s (67%)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11118 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
basic block,
and that basic block ends with a return instruction. In this case, we can just splice
the cloned "body" of the function directly into the source basic block, avoiding a lot
of rearrangement and splitBasicBlock's linear scan over the split block. This speeds up
the inliner on the testcase in PR209 from 2.3s to 1.7s, a 35% reduction.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11116 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11114 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
before we delete the original call site, allowing slight simplifications of
code, but nothing exciting.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11109 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
process. The only optimization we did so far is to avoid creating a
PHI node, then immediately destroying it in the common case where the
callee has one return statement. Instead, we just don't create the return
value. This has no noticable performance impact, but paves the way for
future improvements.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11108 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
to add the cloned block to. This allows the block to be added to the function
immediately, and all of the instructions to be immediately added to the function
symbol table, which speeds up the inliner from 3.7 -> 3.38s on the PR209.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11107 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
process them all as a group. This speeds up SRoA/mem2reg from 28.46s to
0.62s on the testcase from PR209.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11100 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
SRoA/mem2reg from 41.2s to 27.5s on the testcase in PR209.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11099 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@11003 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10799 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10792 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10789 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
ConstantFoldTerminator
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10785 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
case that the C/C++ front-end generates.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10761 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
getSubLoops/getTopLevelLoops methods, replacing them with iterator-based
accessors.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10714 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10531 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10529 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Fix bug: LowerInvoke/2003-12-10-Crash.llx
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10382 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|