| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
address space.
This checkin also adds in some tests that utilize these paths and updates some of the
clients.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166578 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
over the implicitly-formed-and-nesting CGSCC pass manager and function
pass managers, especially when using them on the opt commandline or
using extension points in the module builder. The '-barrier' opt flag
(or the pass itself) will create a no-op module pass in the pipeline,
resetting the pass manager stack, and allowing the creation of a new
pipeline of function passes or CGSCC passes to be created that is
independent from any previous pipelines.
For example, this can be used to test running two CGSCC passes in
independent CGSCC pass managers as opposed to in the same CGSCC pass
manager. It also allows us to introduce a further hack into the
PassManagerBuilder to separate the O0 pipeline extension passes from the
always-inliner's CGSCC pass manager, which they likely do not want to
participate in... At the very least none of the Sanitizer passes want
this behavior.
This fixes a bug with ASan at O0 currently, and I'll commit the ASan
test which covers this pass. I'm happy to add a test case that this pass
exists and works, but not sure how much time folks would like me to
spend adding test cases for the details of its behavior of partition
pass managers.... The whole thing is just vile, and mostly intended to
unblock ASan, so I'm hoping to rip this all out in a brave new pass
manager world.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166172 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166112 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
simplify the code a bit. No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@166004 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
own class named AttrBuilder. No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165960 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
This gets rid of some magic numbers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165924 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Convert the internal representation of the Attributes class into a pointer to an
opaque object that's uniqued by and stored in the LLVMContext object. The
Attributes class then becomes a thin wrapper around this opaque
object. Eventually, the internal representation will be expanded to include
attributes that represent code generation options, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165899 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
the equivalent from the builder class.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165896 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
it with the equivalent from the builder class.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165895 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
the equivalent from the builder class.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165892 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
namespace. Use the attribute's enum value instead. No functionality change
intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165610 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
attribute object and add it appropriately. No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165595 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165550 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
CollectFunctionDIs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165498 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165494 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
DeadArgumentElimination pass can replace one LLVM function with another,
invalidating a pointer stored in debug info metadata entry for this function.
To fix this, we collect debug info descriptors for functions before
running a DeadArgumentElimination pass and "patch" pointers in metadata nodes
if we replace a function.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165490 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
We use the enums to query whether an Attributes object has that attribute. The
opaque layer is responsible for knowing where that specific attribute is stored.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165468 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
the same thing. No functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165435 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165402 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165209 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165208 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165207 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@165206 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Again, let me know if anything breaks due to this!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164986 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Fun fact: The CBE learned how to deal with this situation before it was removed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164918 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
rdar://9142819
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164850 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
is only stored once.
Fixes PR13968.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164815 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if Commit 164767
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164768 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
have testcases for the current problems.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164731 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
The hasFnAttr method has been replaced by querying the Attributes explicitly. No
intended functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164629 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Queue the fallout. ;]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164480 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
builders green again.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164124 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
FCAs. This is essential in order to promote allocas that are used in
struct returns by frontends like Clang. The FCA load would block the
rest of the pass from firing, resulting is significant regressions with
the bullet benchmark in the nightly test suite.
Thanks to Duncan for repeated discussions about how best to do this, and
to both him and Benjamin for review.
This appears to have blocked many places where the pass tries to fire,
and so I'm expect somewhat different results with this fix added.
As with the last big patch, I'm including a change to enable the SROA by
default *temporarily*. Ben is going to remove this as soon as the LNT
bots pick up the patch. I'm just trying to get a round of LNT numbers
from the stable machines in the lab.
NOTE: Four clang tests are expected to fail in the brief window where
this is enabled. Sorry for the noise!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164119 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
What we have so far:
- Some clang test failures (these were known already)
- Perf results are mixed, some big regressions
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/3844
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/3845
bullet suffers a lot. matmul is interesting: slower scalar code, faster with -vectorize.
- Some dragonegg selfhost bots crash in SROA during selfhost now
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/dragonegg-x86_64-linux-gcc-4.6-self-host-checks/builds/1632
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/dragonegg-x86_64-linux-gcc-4.5-self-host/builds/1891
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163968 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
new one, and add support for running the new pass in that mode and in
that slot of the pass manager. With this the new pass can completely
replace the old one within the pipeline.
The strategy for enabling or disabling the SSAUpdater logic is to do it
by making the requirement of the domtree analysis optional. By default,
it is required and we get the standard mem2reg approach. This is usually
the desired strategy when run in stand-alone situations. Within the
CGSCC pass manager, we disable requiring of the domtree analysis and
consequentially trigger fallback to the SSAUpdater promotion.
In theory this would allow the pass to re-use a domtree if one happened
to be available even when run in a mode that doesn't require it. In
practice, it lets us have a single pass rather than two which was
simpler for me to wrap my head around.
There is a hidden flag to force the use of the SSAUpdater code path for
the purpose of testing. The primary testing strategy is just to run the
existing tests through that path. One notable difference is that it has
custom code to handle lifetime markers, and one of the tests has been
enhanced to exercise that code.
This has survived a bootstrap and the test suite without serious
correctness issues, however my run of the test suite produced *very*
alarming performance numbers. I don't entirely understand or trust them
though, so more investigation is on-going.
To aid my understanding of the performance impact of the new SROA now
that it runs throughout the optimization pipeline, I'm enabling it by
default in this commit, and will disable it again once the LNT bots have
picked up one iteration with it. I want to get those bots (which are
much more stable) to evaluate the impact of the change before I jump to
any conclusions.
NOTE: Several Clang tests will fail because they run -O3 and check the
result's order of output. They'll go back to passing once I disable it
again.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163965 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
being busy testing this...
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163890 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
This is essentially a ground up re-think of the SROA pass in LLVM. It
was initially inspired by a few problems with the existing pass:
- It is subject to the bane of my existence in optimizations: arbitrary
thresholds.
- It is overly conservative about which constructs can be split and
promoted.
- The vector value replacement aspect is separated from the splitting
logic, missing many opportunities where splitting and vector value
formation can work together.
- The splitting is entirely based around the underlying type of the
alloca, despite this type often having little to do with the reality
of how that memory is used. This is especially prevelant with unions
and base classes where we tail-pack derived members.
- When splitting fails (often due to the thresholds), the vector value
replacement (again because it is separate) can kick in for
preposterous cases where we simply should have split the value. This
results in forming i1024 and i2048 integer "bit vectors" that
tremendously slow down subsequnet IR optimizations (due to large
APInts) and impede the backend's lowering.
The new design takes an approach that fundamentally is not susceptible
to many of these problems. It is the result of a discusison between
myself and Duncan Sands over IRC about how to premptively avoid these
types of problems and how to do SROA in a more principled way. Since
then, it has evolved and grown, but this remains an important aspect: it
fixes real world problems with the SROA process today.
First, the transform of SROA actually has little to do with replacement.
It has more to do with splitting. The goal is to take an aggregate
alloca and form a composition of scalar allocas which can replace it and
will be most suitable to the eventual replacement by scalar SSA values.
The actual replacement is performed by mem2reg (and in the future
SSAUpdater).
The splitting is divided into four phases. The first phase is an
analysis of the uses of the alloca. This phase recursively walks uses,
building up a dense datastructure representing the ranges of the
alloca's memory actually used and checking for uses which inhibit any
aspects of the transform such as the escape of a pointer.
Once we have a mapping of the ranges of the alloca used by individual
operations, we compute a partitioning of the used ranges. Some uses are
inherently splittable (such as memcpy and memset), while scalar uses are
not splittable. The goal is to build a partitioning that has the minimum
number of splits while placing each unsplittable use in its own
partition. Overlapping unsplittable uses belong to the same partition.
This is the target split of the aggregate alloca, and it maximizes the
number of scalar accesses which become accesses to their own alloca and
candidates for promotion.
Third, we re-walk the uses of the alloca and assign each specific memory
access to all the partitions touched so that we have dense use-lists for
each partition.
Finally, we build a new, smaller alloca for each partition and rewrite
each use of that partition to use the new alloca. During this phase the
pass will also work very hard to transform uses of an alloca into a form
suitable for promotion, including forming vector operations, speculating
loads throguh PHI nodes and selects, etc.
After splitting is complete, each newly refined alloca that is
a candidate for promotion to a scalar SSA value is run through mem2reg.
There are lots of reasonably detailed comments in the source code about
the design and algorithms, and I'm going to be trying to improve them in
subsequent commits to ensure this is well documented, as the new pass is
in many ways more complex than the old one.
Some of this is still a WIP, but the current state is reasonbly stable.
It has passed bootstrap, the nightly test suite, and Duncan has run it
successfully through the ACATS and DragonEgg test suites. That said, it
remains behind a default-off flag until the last few pieces are in
place, and full testing can be done.
Specific areas I'm looking at next:
- Improved comments and some code cleanup from reviews.
- SSAUpdater and enabling this pass inside the CGSCC pass manager.
- Some datastructure tuning and compile-time measurements.
- More aggressive FCA splitting and vector formation.
Many thanks to Duncan Sands for the thorough final review, as well as
Benjamin Kramer for lots of review during the process of writing this
pass, and Daniel Berlin for reviewing the data structures and algorithms
and general theory of the pass. Also, several other people on IRC, over
lunch tables, etc for lots of feedback and advice.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163883 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163808 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
This disables malloc-specific optimization when -fno-builtin (or -ffreestanding)
is specified. This has been a problem for a long time but became more severe
with the recent memory builtin improvements.
Since the memory builtin functions are used everywhere, this required passing
TLI in many places. This means that functions that now have an optional TLI
argument, like RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadFunctions, won't remove dead
mallocs anymore if the TLI argument is missing. I've updated most passes to do
the right thing.
Fixes PR13694 and probably others.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@162841 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
The "findUsedStructTypes" method is very expensive to run. It needs to be
optimized so that LTO can run faster. Splitting this method out of the Module
class will help this occur. For instance, it can keep a list of seen objects so
that it doesn't process them over and over again.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@161228 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
encounter an invoke of an allocation function. This should fix the dragonegg
bootstrap. Testcase to follow, later.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160757 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
Darwin bootstrap. Testcase exists but isn't fully reduced, I expect to commit
the testcase this evening.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160693 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
might be deliberate "one time" leaks, so that leak checkers can find them.
This is a reapply of r160602 with the fix that this time I'm committing the
code I thought I was committing last time; the I->eraseFromParent() goes
*after* the break out of the loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160664 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160603 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
|
r160529 that was subsequently reverted. The fix was to not call
GV->eraseFromParent() right before the caller does the same. The existing
testcases already caught this bug if run under valgrind.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160602 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
|
