aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-03-12Small fix for cost analysis of ptrtoint.Patrik Hagglund
This seems to be a "copy-paste error" introducecd in r156140. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176863 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-02-08ARM cost model: Address computation in vector mem ops not freeArnold Schwaighofer
Adds a function to target transform info to query for the cost of address computation. The cost model analysis pass now also queries this interface. The code in LoopVectorize adds the cost of address computation as part of the memory instruction cost calculation. Only there, we know whether the instruction will be scalarized or not. Increase the penality for inserting in to D registers on swift. This becomes necessary because we now always assume that address computation has a cost and three is a closer value to the architecture. radar://13097204 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@174713 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-22Begin fleshing out an interface in TTI for modelling the costs ofChandler Carruth
generic function calls and intrinsics. This is somewhat overlapping with an existing intrinsic cost method, but that one seems targetted at vector intrinsics. I'll merge them or separate their names and use cases in a separate commit. This sinks the test of 'callIsSmall' down into TTI where targets can control it. The whole thing feels very hack-ish to me though. I've left a FIXME comment about the fundamental design problem this presents. It isn't yet clear to me what the users of this function *really* care about. I'll have to do more analysis to figure that out. Putting this here at least provides it access to proper analysis pass tools and other such. It also allows us to more cleanly implement the baseline cost interfaces in TTI. With this commit, it is now theoretically possible to simplify much of the inline cost analysis's handling of calls by calling through to this interface. That conversion will have to happen in subsequent commits as it requires more extensive restructuring of the inline cost analysis. The CodeMetrics class is now really only in the business of running over a block of code and aggregating the metrics on that block of code, with the actual cost evaluation done entirely in terms of TTI. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173148 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-21Switch CodeMetrics itself over to use TTI to determine if an instructionChandler Carruth
is free. The whole CodeMetrics API should probably be reworked more, but this is enough to allow deleting the duplicate code there for computing whether an instruction is free. All of the passes using this have been updated to pull in TTI and hand it to the CodeMetrics stuff. Further, a dead CodeMetrics API (analyzeFunction) is nuked for lack of users. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@173036 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-21Introduce a generic interface for querying an operation's expectedChandler Carruth
lowered cost. Currently, this is a direct port of the logic implementing isInstructionFree in CodeMetrics. The hope is that the interface can be improved (f.ex. supporting un-formed instruction queries) and the implementation abstracted so that as we have test cases and target knowledge we can expose increasingly accurate heuristics to clients. I'll start switching existing consumers over and kill off the routine in CodeMetrics in subsequent commits. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172998 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-20Revert CostTable algorithm, will re-writeRenato Golin
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172992 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-19Fix 80-col and early exit in cost modelRenato Golin
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172877 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-16Change CostTable model to be global to all targetsRenato Golin
Moving the X86CostTable to a common place, so that other back-ends can share the code. Also simplifying it a bit and commoning up tables with one and two types on operations. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172658 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-09ARM Cost model: Use the size of vector registers and widest vectorizable ↵Nadav Rotem
instruction to determine the max vectorization factor. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@172010 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-09Cost Model: Move the 'max unroll factor' variable to the TTI and add initial ↵Nadav Rotem
Cost Model support on ARM. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171928 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-07Switch the SCEV expander and LoopStrengthReduce to useChandler Carruth
TargetTransformInfo rather than TargetLowering, removing one of the primary instances of the layering violation of Transforms depending directly on Target. This is a really big deal because LSR used to be a "special" pass that could only be tested fully using llc and by looking at the full output of it. It also couldn't run with any other loop passes because it had to be created by the backend. No longer is this true. LSR is now just a normal pass and we should probably lift the creation of LSR out of lib/CodeGen/Passes.cpp and into the PassManagerBuilder. =] I've not done this, or updated all of the tests to use opt and a triple, because I suspect someone more familiar with LSR would do a better job. This change should be essentially without functional impact for normal compilations, and only change behvaior of targetless compilations. The conversion required changing all of the LSR code to refer to the TTI interfaces, which fortunately are very similar to TargetLowering's interfaces. However, it also allowed us to *always* expect to have some implementation around. I've pushed that simplification through the pass, and leveraged it to simplify code somewhat. It required some test updates for one of two things: either we used to skip some checks altogether but now we get the default "no" answer for them, or we used to have no information about the target and now we do have some. I've also started the process of removing AddrMode, as the TTI interface doesn't use it any longer. In some cases this simplifies code, and in others it adds some complexity, but I think it's not a bad tradeoff even there. Subsequent patches will try to clean this up even further and use other (more appropriate) abstractions. Yet again, almost all of the formatting changes brought to you by clang-format. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171735 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-07Make the popcnt support enums and methods have more clear names andChandler Carruth
follow the conding conventions regarding enumerating a set of "kinds" of things. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171687 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2013-01-07Move TargetTransformInfo to live under the Analysis library. This noChandler Carruth
longer would violate any dependency layering and it is in fact an analysis. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@171686 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8