Instcombine was transforming:

  %shr = lshr i64 %key, 3
  %0 = load i64* %val, align 8
  %sub = add i64 %0, -1
  %and = and i64 %sub, %shr
  ret i64 %and

to:
  %shr = lshr i64 %key, 3
  %0 = load i64* %val, align 8
  %sub = add i64 %0, 2305843009213693951
  %and = and i64 %sub, %shr
  ret i64 %and

The demanded bit optimization is actually a pessimization because add -1 would
be codegen'ed as a sub 1. Teach the demanded constant shrinking optimization
to check for negated constant to make sure it is actually reducing the width
of the constant.

rdar://11793464


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@160101 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp
index 125c74a89a..0a62242436 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp
@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ static bool ShrinkDemandedConstant(Instruction *I, unsigned OpNo,
 
   // This instruction is producing bits that are not demanded. Shrink the RHS.
   Demanded &= OpC->getValue();
+  if (I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add) {
+    // However, if the instruction is an add then the constant may be negated
+    // when the opcode is changed to sub. Check if the transformation is really
+    // shrinking the constant.
+    if (Demanded.abs().getActiveBits() > OpC->getValue().abs().getActiveBits())
+      return false;
+  }
   I->setOperand(OpNo, ConstantInt::get(OpC->getType(), Demanded));
   return true;
 }