aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2008-10-21 03:29:32 +0000
committerDan Gohman <gohman@apple.com>2008-10-21 03:29:32 +0000
commit279c22e6da2612f024b70e5509ffb0cad32f38b2 (patch)
tree6499655e356d56dc612145ffb3a4f9f0d9694c41 /lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
parent3afda6e9d1a74456b9baa87ee6aabbc06e356433 (diff)
Optimized FCMP_OEQ and FCMP_UNE for x86.
Where previously LLVM might emit code like this: ucomisd %xmm1, %xmm0 setne %al setp %cl orb %al, %cl jne .LBB4_2 it now emits this: ucomisd %xmm1, %xmm0 jne .LBB4_2 jp .LBB4_2 It has fewer instructions and uses fewer registers, but it does have more branches. And in the case that this code is followed by a non-fallthrough edge, it may be followed by a jmp instruction, resulting in three branch instructions in sequence. Some effort is made to avoid this situation. To achieve this, X86ISelLowering.cpp now recognizes FCMP_OEQ and FCMP_UNE in lowered form, and replace them with code that emits two branches, except in the case where it would require converting a fall-through edge to an explicit branch. Also, X86InstrInfo.cpp's branch analysis and transform code now knows now to handle blocks with multiple conditional branches. It uses loops instead of having fixed checks for up to two instructions. It can now analyze and transform code generated from FCMP_OEQ and FCMP_UNE. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@57873 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp205
1 files changed, 120 insertions, 85 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
index 84e113f885..2db1448fd7 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.cpp
@@ -1455,88 +1455,101 @@ bool X86InstrInfo::AnalyzeBranch(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
MachineBasicBlock *&TBB,
MachineBasicBlock *&FBB,
SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand> &Cond) const {
- // If the block has no terminators, it just falls into the block after it.
+ // Start from the bottom of the block and work up, examining the
+ // terminator instructions.
MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB.end();
- if (I == MBB.begin() || !isBrAnalysisUnpredicatedTerminator(--I, *this))
- return false;
-
- // Get the last instruction in the block.
- MachineInstr *LastInst = I;
-
- // If there is only one terminator instruction, process it.
- if (I == MBB.begin() || !isBrAnalysisUnpredicatedTerminator(--I, *this)) {
- if (!LastInst->getDesc().isBranch())
+ while (I != MBB.begin()) {
+ --I;
+ // Working from the bottom, when we see a non-terminator
+ // instruction, we're done.
+ if (!isBrAnalysisUnpredicatedTerminator(I, *this))
+ break;
+ // A terminator that isn't a branch can't easily be handled
+ // by this analysis.
+ if (!I->getDesc().isBranch())
return true;
-
- // If the block ends with a branch there are 3 possibilities:
- // it's an unconditional, conditional, or indirect branch.
-
- if (LastInst->getOpcode() == X86::JMP) {
- TBB = LastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB();
- return false;
+ // Handle unconditional branches.
+ if (I->getOpcode() == X86::JMP) {
+ // If the block has any instructions after a JMP, delete them.
+ while (next(I) != MBB.end())
+ next(I)->eraseFromParent();
+ Cond.clear();
+ FBB = 0;
+ // Delete the JMP if it's equivalent to a fall-through.
+ if (MBB.isLayoutSuccessor(I->getOperand(0).getMBB())) {
+ TBB = 0;
+ I->eraseFromParent();
+ I = MBB.end();
+ continue;
+ }
+ // TBB is used to indicate the unconditinal destination.
+ TBB = I->getOperand(0).getMBB();
+ continue;
}
- X86::CondCode BranchCode = GetCondFromBranchOpc(LastInst->getOpcode());
+ // Handle conditional branches.
+ X86::CondCode BranchCode = GetCondFromBranchOpc(I->getOpcode());
if (BranchCode == X86::COND_INVALID)
return true; // Can't handle indirect branch.
-
- // Otherwise, block ends with fall-through condbranch.
- TBB = LastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB();
- Cond.push_back(MachineOperand::CreateImm(BranchCode));
- return false;
- }
-
- // Get the instruction before it if it's a terminator.
- MachineInstr *SecondLastInst = I;
-
- // If there are three terminators, we don't know what sort of block this is.
- if (SecondLastInst && I != MBB.begin() &&
- isBrAnalysisUnpredicatedTerminator(--I, *this))
- return true;
-
- // If the block ends with X86::JMP and a conditional branch, handle it.
- X86::CondCode BranchCode = GetCondFromBranchOpc(SecondLastInst->getOpcode());
- if (BranchCode != X86::COND_INVALID && LastInst->getOpcode() == X86::JMP) {
- TBB = SecondLastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB();
- Cond.push_back(MachineOperand::CreateImm(BranchCode));
- FBB = LastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB();
- return false;
- }
-
- // If the block ends with two X86::JMPs, handle it. The second one is not
- // executed, so remove it.
- if (SecondLastInst->getOpcode() == X86::JMP &&
- LastInst->getOpcode() == X86::JMP) {
- TBB = SecondLastInst->getOperand(0).getMBB();
- I = LastInst;
- I->eraseFromParent();
- return false;
+ // Working from the bottom, handle the first conditional branch.
+ if (Cond.empty()) {
+ FBB = TBB;
+ TBB = I->getOperand(0).getMBB();
+ Cond.push_back(MachineOperand::CreateImm(BranchCode));
+ continue;
+ }
+ // Handle subsequent conditional branches. Only handle the case
+ // where all conditional branches branch to the same destination
+ // and their condition opcodes fit one of the special
+ // multi-branch idioms.
+ assert(Cond.size() == 1);
+ assert(TBB);
+ // Only handle the case where all conditional branches branch to
+ // the same destination.
+ if (TBB != I->getOperand(0).getMBB())
+ return true;
+ X86::CondCode OldBranchCode = (X86::CondCode)Cond[0].getImm();
+ // If the conditions are the same, we can leave them alone.
+ if (OldBranchCode == BranchCode)
+ continue;
+ // If they differ, see if they fit one of the known patterns.
+ // Theoretically we could handle more patterns here, but
+ // we shouldn't expect to see them if instruction selection
+ // has done a reasonable job.
+ if ((OldBranchCode == X86::COND_NP &&
+ BranchCode == X86::COND_E) ||
+ (OldBranchCode == X86::COND_E &&
+ BranchCode == X86::COND_NP))
+ BranchCode = X86::COND_NP_OR_E;
+ else if ((OldBranchCode == X86::COND_P &&
+ BranchCode == X86::COND_NE) ||
+ (OldBranchCode == X86::COND_NE &&
+ BranchCode == X86::COND_P))
+ BranchCode = X86::COND_NE_OR_P;
+ else
+ return true;
+ // Update the MachineOperand.
+ Cond[0].setImm(BranchCode);
}
- // Otherwise, can't handle this.
- return true;
+ return false;
}
unsigned X86InstrInfo::RemoveBranch(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const {
MachineBasicBlock::iterator I = MBB.end();
- if (I == MBB.begin()) return 0;
- --I;
- if (I->getOpcode() != X86::JMP &&
- GetCondFromBranchOpc(I->getOpcode()) == X86::COND_INVALID)
- return 0;
-
- // Remove the branch.
- I->eraseFromParent();
-
- I = MBB.end();
-
- if (I == MBB.begin()) return 1;
- --I;
- if (GetCondFromBranchOpc(I->getOpcode()) == X86::COND_INVALID)
- return 1;
+ unsigned Count = 0;
+
+ while (I != MBB.begin()) {
+ --I;
+ if (I->getOpcode() != X86::JMP &&
+ GetCondFromBranchOpc(I->getOpcode()) == X86::COND_INVALID)
+ break;
+ // Remove the branch.
+ I->eraseFromParent();
+ I = MBB.end();
+ ++Count;
+ }
- // Remove the branch.
- I->eraseFromParent();
- return 2;
+ return Count;
}
static const MachineInstrBuilder &X86InstrAddOperand(MachineInstrBuilder &MIB,
@@ -1571,23 +1584,43 @@ X86InstrInfo::InsertBranch(MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock *TBB,
assert((Cond.size() == 1 || Cond.size() == 0) &&
"X86 branch conditions have one component!");
- if (FBB == 0) { // One way branch.
- if (Cond.empty()) {
- // Unconditional branch?
- BuildMI(&MBB, get(X86::JMP)).addMBB(TBB);
- } else {
- // Conditional branch.
- unsigned Opc = GetCondBranchFromCond((X86::CondCode)Cond[0].getImm());
- BuildMI(&MBB, get(Opc)).addMBB(TBB);
- }
+ if (Cond.empty()) {
+ // Unconditional branch?
+ assert(!FBB && "Unconditional branch with multiple successors!");
+ BuildMI(&MBB, get(X86::JMP)).addMBB(TBB);
return 1;
}
-
- // Two-way Conditional branch.
- unsigned Opc = GetCondBranchFromCond((X86::CondCode)Cond[0].getImm());
- BuildMI(&MBB, get(Opc)).addMBB(TBB);
- BuildMI(&MBB, get(X86::JMP)).addMBB(FBB);
- return 2;
+
+ // Conditional branch.
+ unsigned Count = 0;
+ X86::CondCode CC = (X86::CondCode)Cond[0].getImm();
+ switch (CC) {
+ case X86::COND_NP_OR_E:
+ // Synthesize NP_OR_E with two branches.
+ BuildMI(&MBB, get(X86::JNP)).addMBB(TBB);
+ ++Count;
+ BuildMI(&MBB, get(X86::JE)).addMBB(TBB);
+ ++Count;
+ break;
+ case X86::COND_NE_OR_P:
+ // Synthesize NE_OR_P with two branches.
+ BuildMI(&MBB, get(X86::JNE)).addMBB(TBB);
+ ++Count;
+ BuildMI(&MBB, get(X86::JP)).addMBB(TBB);
+ ++Count;
+ break;
+ default: {
+ unsigned Opc = GetCondBranchFromCond(CC);
+ BuildMI(&MBB, get(Opc)).addMBB(TBB);
+ ++Count;
+ }
+ }
+ if (FBB) {
+ // Two-way Conditional branch. Insert the second branch.
+ BuildMI(&MBB, get(X86::JMP)).addMBB(FBB);
+ ++Count;
+ }
+ return Count;
}
bool X86InstrInfo::copyRegToReg(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
@@ -2372,6 +2405,8 @@ bool X86InstrInfo::
ReverseBranchCondition(SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand> &Cond) const {
assert(Cond.size() == 1 && "Invalid X86 branch condition!");
X86::CondCode CC = static_cast<X86::CondCode>(Cond[0].getImm());
+ if (CC == X86::COND_NE_OR_P || CC == X86::COND_NP_OR_E)
+ return true;
Cond[0].setImm(GetOppositeBranchCondition(CC));
return false;
}