diff options
author | Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund@2pi.dk> | 2009-09-23 20:57:55 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund@2pi.dk> | 2009-09-23 20:57:55 +0000 |
commit | 39523e2cfb625d90aa122252b041e2311a9a8ca5 (patch) | |
tree | d7de84b5e9d0462b232ada5a7934af5182cb72a8 /lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp | |
parent | 959b002c4d3ee11546d7f6c750339d58edc5338f (diff) |
Fix verification of explicit operands.
The machine code verifier did not check for explicit operands correctly. It
used MachineInstr::getNumExplicitOperands, but that method may cheat and use
the declared count in the TargetInstrDesc.
Now we check the explicit operands one at a time in visitMachineOperand.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@82652 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp | 19 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp index b4d6588bf4..02e48dd2fe 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/MachineVerifier.cpp @@ -466,18 +466,11 @@ void MachineVerifier::visitMachineInstrBefore(const MachineInstr *MI) { const TargetInstrDesc &TI = MI->getDesc(); - if (MI->getNumExplicitOperands() < TI.getNumOperands()) { + if (MI->getNumOperands() < TI.getNumOperands()) { report("Too few operands", MI); *OS << TI.getNumOperands() << " operands expected, but " << MI->getNumExplicitOperands() << " given.\n"; } - if (!TI.isVariadic()) { - if (MI->getNumExplicitOperands() > TI.getNumOperands()) { - report("Too many operands", MI); - *OS << TI.getNumOperands() << " operands expected, but " - << MI->getNumExplicitOperands() << " given.\n"; - } - } } void @@ -494,6 +487,16 @@ MachineVerifier::visitMachineOperand(const MachineOperand *MO, unsigned MONum) report("Explicit definition marked as use", MO, MONum); else if (MO->isImplicit()) report("Explicit definition marked as implicit", MO, MONum); + } else if (MONum < TI.getNumOperands()) { + if (MO->isReg()) { + if (MO->isDef()) + report("Explicit operand marked as def", MO, MONum); + if (MO->isImplicit()) + report("Explicit operand marked as implicit", MO, MONum); + } + } else { + if (MO->isReg() && !MO->isImplicit() && !TI.isVariadic()) + report("Extra explicit operand on non-variadic instruction", MO, MONum); } switch (MO->getType()) { |