aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKevin Enderby <enderby@apple.com>2012-03-12 21:32:09 +0000
committerKevin Enderby <enderby@apple.com>2012-03-12 21:32:09 +0000
commit84faf659125cb354794e457fa5a8a8daad84760d (patch)
tree7a6839491302358b23187a26eec79fc674c1b787
parenta185362095c0a6138216e61d4a767b930bcc7826 (diff)
Added a missing error check for X86 assembly with mismatched base and index
registers not both being 64-bit or both being 32-bit registers. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@152580 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp19
-rw-r--r--test/MC/X86/x86_errors.s4
2 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
index e05b50c57e..ce32c7753f 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
@@ -838,6 +838,7 @@ X86Operand *X86AsmParser::ParseMemOperand(unsigned SegReg, SMLoc MemStart) {
// If we reached here, then we just ate the ( of the memory operand. Process
// the rest of the memory operand.
unsigned BaseReg = 0, IndexReg = 0, Scale = 1;
+ SMLoc IndexLoc;
if (getLexer().is(AsmToken::Percent)) {
SMLoc StartLoc, EndLoc;
@@ -851,6 +852,7 @@ X86Operand *X86AsmParser::ParseMemOperand(unsigned SegReg, SMLoc MemStart) {
if (getLexer().is(AsmToken::Comma)) {
Parser.Lex(); // Eat the comma.
+ IndexLoc = Parser.getTok().getLoc();
// Following the comma we should have either an index register, or a scale
// value. We don't support the later form, but we want to parse it
@@ -912,6 +914,23 @@ X86Operand *X86AsmParser::ParseMemOperand(unsigned SegReg, SMLoc MemStart) {
SMLoc MemEnd = Parser.getTok().getLoc();
Parser.Lex(); // Eat the ')'.
+ // If we have both a base register and an index register make sure they are
+ // both 64-bit or 32-bit registers.
+ if (BaseReg != 0 && IndexReg != 0) {
+ if (X86MCRegisterClasses[X86::GR64RegClassID].contains(BaseReg) &&
+ !X86MCRegisterClasses[X86::GR64RegClassID].contains(IndexReg) &&
+ IndexReg != X86::RIZ) {
+ Error(IndexLoc, "index register is 32-bit, but base register is 64-bit");
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (X86MCRegisterClasses[X86::GR32RegClassID].contains(BaseReg) &&
+ !X86MCRegisterClasses[X86::GR32RegClassID].contains(IndexReg) &&
+ IndexReg != X86::EIZ){
+ Error(IndexLoc, "index register is 64-bit, but base register is 32-bit");
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
return X86Operand::CreateMem(SegReg, Disp, BaseReg, IndexReg, Scale,
MemStart, MemEnd);
}
diff --git a/test/MC/X86/x86_errors.s b/test/MC/X86/x86_errors.s
index 8f2e1af40b..f161e06cb5 100644
--- a/test/MC/X86/x86_errors.s
+++ b/test/MC/X86/x86_errors.s
@@ -24,3 +24,7 @@ sysexitq
// rdar://10710167
// 64: error: expected scale expression
lea (%rsp, %rbp, $4), %rax
+
+// rdar://10423777
+// 64: error: index register is 32-bit, but base register is 64-bit
+movq (%rsi,%ecx),%xmm0