aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2012-06-19 17:40:35 +0000
committerChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2012-06-19 17:40:35 +0000
commit2a79116940012acaad9cc70efef79d7359f27513 (patch)
tree08260362bb9c61609ed5ed672cdf0667300457e4
parent0fb9b9a46a55df07edab41517b12ac30cfcedbbc (diff)
Fix PR13148, an inf-loop in StringMap.
StringMap suffered from the same bug as DenseMap: when you explicitly construct it with a small number of buckets, you can arrange for the tombstone-based growth path to be followed when the number of buckets was less than '8'. In that case, even with a full map, it would compare '0' as not less than '0', and refuse to grow the table, leading to inf-loops trying to find an empty bucket on the next insertion. The fix is very simple: use '<=' as the comparison. The same fix was applied to DenseMap as well during its recent refactoring. Thanks to Alex Bolz for the great report and test case. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@158725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/Support/StringMap.cpp2
-rw-r--r--unittests/ADT/StringMapTest.cpp22
2 files changed, 23 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp b/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp
index c131fe07f4..c2fc261df3 100644
--- a/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp
+++ b/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ void StringMapImpl::RehashTable() {
// grow/rehash the table.
if (NumItems*4 > NumBuckets*3) {
NewSize = NumBuckets*2;
- } else if (NumBuckets-(NumItems+NumTombstones) < NumBuckets/8) {
+ } else if (NumBuckets-(NumItems+NumTombstones) <= NumBuckets/8) {
NewSize = NumBuckets;
} else {
return;
diff --git a/unittests/ADT/StringMapTest.cpp b/unittests/ADT/StringMapTest.cpp
index 66e04933ad..5bb65cbd7a 100644
--- a/unittests/ADT/StringMapTest.cpp
+++ b/unittests/ADT/StringMapTest.cpp
@@ -134,6 +134,28 @@ TEST_F(StringMapTest, InsertAndEraseTest) {
assertSingleItemMap();
}
+TEST_F(StringMapTest, SmallFullMapTest) {
+ // StringMap has a tricky corner case when the map is small (<8 buckets) and
+ // it fills up through a balanced pattern of inserts and erases. This can
+ // lead to inf-loops in some cases (PR13148) so we test it explicitly here.
+ llvm::StringMap<int> Map(2);
+
+ Map["eins"] = 1;
+ Map["zwei"] = 2;
+ Map["drei"] = 3;
+ Map.erase("drei");
+ Map.erase("eins");
+ Map["veir"] = 4;
+ Map["funf"] = 5;
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(3u, Map.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, Map.lookup("eins"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, Map.lookup("zwei"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, Map.lookup("drei"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, Map.lookup("veir"));
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, Map.lookup("funf"));
+}
+
// A more complex iteration test.
TEST_F(StringMapTest, IterationTest) {
bool visited[100];