diff options
author | Andrew Trick <atrick@apple.com> | 2012-04-18 04:00:10 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Trick <atrick@apple.com> | 2012-04-18 04:00:10 +0000 |
commit | b5122635966a980a850c028895e275a43e0f946d (patch) | |
tree | 83696554fb255db9dd225597e32d2da027cfc65b | |
parent | 575fcb38de5ef0b37cff1c3d5c18cbc34edb6af1 (diff) |
loop-reduce: Add an early bailout to catch extremely large loops.
This introduces a threshold of 200 IV Users, which is very
conservative but should be sufficient to avoid serious compile time
sink or stack overflow. The llvm test-suite with LTO never exceeds 190
users per loop.
The bug doesn't relate to a specific type of loop. Checking in an
arbitrary giant loop as a unit test would be silly.
Fixes rdar://11262507.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@154983 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp index d57ec22f44..fe4700b36e 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopStrengthReduce.cpp @@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ #include <algorithm> using namespace llvm; +/// MaxIVUsers is an arbitrary threshold that provides an early opportunitiy for +/// bail out. This threshold is far beyond the number of users that LSR can +/// conceivably solve, so it should not affect generated code, but catches the +/// worst cases before LSR burns too much compile time and stack space. +static const unsigned MaxIVUsers = 200; + // Temporary flag to cleanup congruent phis after LSR phi expansion. // It's currently disabled until we can determine whether it's truly useful or // not. The flag should be removed after the v3.0 release. @@ -4519,6 +4525,17 @@ LSRInstance::LSRInstance(const TargetLowering *tli, Loop *l, Pass *P) // If there's no interesting work to be done, bail early. if (IU.empty()) return; + // If there's too much analysis to be done, bail early. We won't be able to + // model the problem anyway. + unsigned NumUsers = 0; + for (IVUsers::const_iterator UI = IU.begin(), E = IU.end(); UI != E; ++UI) { + if (++NumUsers > MaxIVUsers) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LSR skipping loop, too many IV Users in " << *L + << "\n"); + return; + } + } + #ifndef NDEBUG // All dominating loops must have preheaders, or SCEVExpander may not be able // to materialize an AddRecExpr whose Start is an outer AddRecExpr. |