From b9035b1fd7933c11e68dbbf49b530cc43bf1da65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Paris Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:21:07 -0400 Subject: IMA: set entry->action to UNKNOWN rather than hard coding ima_parse_rule currently sets entry->action = -1 and then later tests if (entry->action == UNKNOWN). It is true that UNKNOWN == -1 but actually setting it to UNKNOWN makes a lot more sense in case things change in the future. Signed-off-by: Eric Paris Acked-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: James Morris --- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'security/integrity') diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index c771a203669..01270115737 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_measure_rule_entry *entry) ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_INTEGRITY_RULE); entry->uid = -1; - entry->action = -1; + entry->action = UNKNOWN; while ((p = strsep(&rule, " ")) != NULL) { substring_t args[MAX_OPT_ARGS]; int token; -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258