From c5444198ca210498e8ac0ba121b4cd3537aa12f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:15:15 +0200 Subject: writeback: simplify and split bdi_start_writeback bdi_start_writeback now never gets a superblock passed, so we can just remove that case. And to further untangle the code and flatten the call stack split it into two trivial helpers for it's two callers. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- mm/page-writeback.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index bbd396ac954..54f28bd493d 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, (!laptop_mode && ((global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) + global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS)) > background_thresh))) - bdi_start_writeback(bdi, NULL, 0); + bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi); } void set_page_dirty_balance(struct page *page, int page_mkwrite) @@ -705,9 +705,8 @@ void laptop_mode_timer_fn(unsigned long data) * We want to write everything out, not just down to the dirty * threshold */ - if (bdi_has_dirty_io(&q->backing_dev_info)) - bdi_start_writeback(&q->backing_dev_info, NULL, nr_pages); + bdi_start_writeback(&q->backing_dev_info, nr_pages); } /* -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258 From 4d845ebf4cf9e985b1704b1f08b37f744b4ede13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:05:18 -0700 Subject: memcg: fix wake up in oom wait queue OOM-waitqueue should be waken up when oom_disable is canceled. This is a fix for 3c11ecf448eff8f1 ("memcg: oom kill disable and oom status"). How to test: Create a cgroup A... 1. set memory.limit and memory.memsw.limit to be small value 2. echo 1 > /cgroup/A/memory.oom_control, this disables oom-kill. 3. run a program which must cause OOM. A program executed in 3 will sleep by oom_waiqueue in memcg. Then, how to wake it up is problem. 1. echo 0 > /cgroup/A/memory.oom_control (enable OOM-killer) 2. echo big mem > /cgroup/A/memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes(allow more swap) etc.. Without the patch, a task in slept can not be waken up. Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Acked-by: Daisuke Nishimura Cc: Balbir Singh Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/memcontrol.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index c6ece0a5759..20a8193a7af 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static void memcg_wakeup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem) static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem_cgroup *mem) { - if (mem->oom_kill_disable && atomic_read(&mem->oom_lock)) + if (atomic_read(&mem->oom_lock)) memcg_wakeup_oom(mem); } @@ -3781,6 +3781,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, return -EINVAL; } mem->oom_kill_disable = val; + if (!val) + memcg_oom_recover(mem); cgroup_unlock(); return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258 From 5c0c165490e763eddcbb0b6c8c41ab5cc11ddea0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lee Schermerhorn Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:05:30 -0700 Subject: mempolicy: fix dangling reference to tmpfs superblock mpol My patch to "Factor out duplicate put/frees in mpol_shared_policy_init() to a common return path"; and Dan Carpenter's fix thereto both left a dangling reference to the incoming tmpfs superblock mempolicy structure. A similar leak was introduced earlier when the nodemask was moved offstack to the scratch area despite the note in the comment block regarding the incoming ref. Move the remaining 'put of the incoming "mpol" to the common exit path to drop the reference. Signed-off-by: Lee Schermerhorn Acked-by: Dan Carpenter Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Christoph Lameter Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/mempolicy.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm') diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 5d6fb339de0..5bc0a96beb5 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ void mpol_shared_policy_init(struct shared_policy *sp, struct mempolicy *mpol) NODEMASK_SCRATCH(scratch); if (!scratch) - return; + goto put_mpol; /* contextualize the tmpfs mount point mempolicy */ new = mpol_new(mpol->mode, mpol->flags, &mpol->w.user_nodemask); if (IS_ERR(new)) @@ -2103,19 +2103,20 @@ void mpol_shared_policy_init(struct shared_policy *sp, struct mempolicy *mpol) task_lock(current); ret = mpol_set_nodemask(new, &mpol->w.user_nodemask, scratch); task_unlock(current); - mpol_put(mpol); /* drop our ref on sb mpol */ if (ret) - goto put_free; + goto put_new; /* Create pseudo-vma that contains just the policy */ memset(&pvma, 0, sizeof(struct vm_area_struct)); pvma.vm_end = TASK_SIZE; /* policy covers entire file */ mpol_set_shared_policy(sp, &pvma, new); /* adds ref */ -put_free: +put_new: mpol_put(new); /* drop initial ref */ free_scratch: NODEMASK_SCRATCH_FREE(scratch); +put_mpol: + mpol_put(mpol); /* drop our incoming ref on sb mpol */ } } -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258