From a66979abad090b2765a6c6790c9fdeab996833f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Chinner Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:23:41 +1100 Subject: fs: move i_wb_list out from under inode_lock Protect the inode writeback list with a new global lock inode_wb_list_lock and use it to protect the list manipulations and traversals. This lock replaces the inode_lock as the inodes on the list can be validity checked while holding the inode->i_lock and hence the inode_lock is no longer needed to protect the list. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- mm/rmap.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm/rmap.c') diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index 7dada045644..8da044a1db0 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ * swap_lock (in swap_duplicate, swap_info_get) * mmlist_lock (in mmput, drain_mmlist and others) * mapping->private_lock (in __set_page_dirty_buffers) - * inode_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty) * inode->i_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty) + * inode_wb_list_lock (in set_page_dirty's __mark_inode_dirty) * sb_lock (within inode_lock in fs/fs-writeback.c) * mapping->tree_lock (widely used, in set_page_dirty, * in arch-dependent flush_dcache_mmap_lock, - * within inode_lock in __sync_single_inode) + * within inode_wb_list_lock in __sync_single_inode) * * (code doesn't rely on that order so it could be switched around) * ->tasklist_lock -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258