From 53ce3d9564908794ae7dd32969089b57df5fc098 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Morton Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:27:08 -0800 Subject: smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid If you do smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...) then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds. As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do. While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency reasons. And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/up.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 kernel/up.c (limited to 'kernel/up.c') diff --git a/kernel/up.c b/kernel/up.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ce62cc9e9f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/kernel/up.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* + * Uniprocessor-only support functions. The counterpart to kernel/smp.c + */ + +#include +#include +#include + +int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, void (*func) (void *info), void *info, + int wait) +{ + WARN_ON(cpuid != 0); + local_irq_disable(); + (func)(info); + local_irq_enable(); + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single); -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258