From cacb3c76c2012ade52124e8c6fdc5cb125625772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:09:18 +0530 Subject: tick: Fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic() One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My guess :)). Fix it. Also fix spelling mistake in 'Possible'. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Cc: skarafotis@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2b29ca4230c163e44179941d7c7a16c1474385c2.1395743878.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/time') diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c index 20b2fe37d10..0fec63414fb 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev) * to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource. * Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite * loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies, - * when then will increment time, posibly causing + * which then will increment time, possibly causing * the loop to trigger again and again. */ if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres()) -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258