From 16223d0d61330c85276e84e0ce8e26addcbf00d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Chinner Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 04:50:25 +0000 Subject: xfs: fix inode lookup race commit f30d500f809eca67a21704347ab14bb35877b5ee upstream. When we get concurrent lookups of the same inode that is not in the per-AG inode cache, there is a race condition that triggers warnings in unlock_new_inode() indicating that we are initialising an inode that isn't in a the correct state for a new inode. When we do an inode lookup via a file handle or a bulkstat, we don't serialise lookups at a higher level through the dentry cache (i.e. pathless lookup), and so we can get concurrent lookups of the same inode. The race condition is between the insertion of the inode into the cache in the case of a cache miss and a concurrently lookup: Thread 1 Thread 2 xfs_iget() xfs_iget_cache_miss() xfs_iread() lock radix tree radix_tree_insert() rcu_read_lock radix_tree_lookup lock inode flags XFS_INEW not set igrab() unlock inode flags rcu_read_unlock use uninitialised inode ..... lock inode flags set XFS_INEW unlock inode flags unlock radix tree xfs_setup_inode() inode flags = I_NEW unlock_new_inode() WARNING as inode flags != I_NEW This can lead to inode corruption, inode list corruption, etc, and is generally a bad thing to occur. Fix this by setting XFS_INEW before inserting the inode into the radix tree. This will ensure any concurrent lookup will find the new inode with XFS_INEW set and that forces the lookup to wait until the XFS_INEW flag is removed before allowing the lookup to succeed. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Ben Myers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c index 8c3e46394d4..9271f4c0e90 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c @@ -350,9 +350,20 @@ xfs_iget_cache_miss( BUG(); } - spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); + /* + * These values must be set before inserting the inode into the radix + * tree as the moment it is inserted a concurrent lookup (allowed by the + * RCU locking mechanism) can find it and that lookup must see that this + * is an inode currently under construction (i.e. that XFS_INEW is set). + * The ip->i_flags_lock that protects the XFS_INEW flag forms the + * memory barrier that ensures this detection works correctly at lookup + * time. + */ + ip->i_udquot = ip->i_gdquot = NULL; + xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_INEW); /* insert the new inode */ + spin_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); error = radix_tree_insert(&pag->pag_ici_root, agino, ip); if (unlikely(error)) { WARN_ON(error != -EEXIST); @@ -360,11 +371,6 @@ xfs_iget_cache_miss( error = EAGAIN; goto out_preload_end; } - - /* These values _must_ be set before releasing the radix tree lock! */ - ip->i_udquot = ip->i_gdquot = NULL; - xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_INEW); - spin_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); radix_tree_preload_end(); -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258