From 300b994b74e75120dd1a48529552a44977e0a82a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexey Dobriyan Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:18:52 +0400 Subject: proc: fix return value of proc_reg_open() in "too late" case If ->open() wasn't called, returning 0 is misleading and, theoretically, oopsable: 1) remove_proc_entry clears ->proc_fops, drops lock, 2) ->open "succeeds", 3) ->release oopses, because it assumes ->open was called (single_release()). Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan --- fs/proc/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/proc/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index 8bb03f056c2..c6b4fa7e3b4 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int proc_reg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) if (!pde->proc_fops) { spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock); kfree(pdeo); - return rv; + return -EINVAL; } pde->pde_users++; open = pde->proc_fops->open; -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258