From baab81fa518ecfac597402b462631f5593926623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:58:51 -0600
Subject: BKL-removal: Use unlocked_ioctl for jfs

Convert jfs_ioctl over to not use the BKL. The only potential race
I could see was with two ioctls in parallel changing the flags
and losing the updates. Use the i_mutex to protect against this.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fs/jfs/namei.c')

diff --git a/fs/jfs/namei.c b/fs/jfs/namei.c
index 403cfc24c6f..6440904a051 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/namei.c
@@ -1556,7 +1556,7 @@ const struct file_operations jfs_dir_operations = {
 	.read		= generic_read_dir,
 	.readdir	= jfs_readdir,
 	.fsync		= jfs_fsync,
-	.ioctl		= jfs_ioctl,
+	.unlocked_ioctl = jfs_ioctl,
 };
 
 static int jfs_ci_hash(struct dentry *dir, struct qstr *this)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258