From 9754e39c7bc51328f145e933bfb0df47cd67b6e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 12:33:03 +0200 Subject: jbd: Split updating of journal superblock and marking journal empty There are three case of updating journal superblock. In the first case, we want to mark journal as empty (setting s_sequence to 0), in the second case we want to update log tail, in the third case we want to update s_errno. Split these cases into separate functions. It makes the code slightly more straightforward and later patches will make the distinction even more important. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/jbd/commit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/jbd/commit.c') diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c index 9d31e6a3920..dba9cfd75f1 100644 --- a/fs/jbd/commit.c +++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal) /* Do we need to erase the effects of a prior journal_flush? */ if (journal->j_flags & JFS_FLUSHED) { jbd_debug(3, "super block updated\n"); - journal_update_superblock(journal, 1); + journal_update_sb_log_tail(journal); } else { jbd_debug(3, "superblock not updated\n"); } -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258