From 0c4d2d95d06e920e0c61707e62c7fffc9c57f63a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:03:02 -0400 Subject: Btrfs: use i_version instead of our own sequence We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/super.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index c5f8fca4195..bd6d143cea8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static int btrfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, #ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL sb->s_flags |= MS_POSIXACL; #endif - + sb->s_flags |= MS_I_VERSION; err = open_ctree(sb, fs_devices, (char *)data); if (err) { printk("btrfs: open_ctree failed\n"); -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258