From 5070158804b5339c71809f5e673cea1cfacd804d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 16:25:15 +0530 Subject: cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in cpufreq_frequency_table The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes. Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake. Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its users are updated accordingly. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Acked-by: Simon Horman Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c index 27cacb52479..306d395de99 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, freqs.old = clk_get_rate(armclk) / 1000; freqs.new = s3c64xx_freq_table[i].frequency; freqs.flags = 0; - dvfs = &s3c64xx_dvfs_table[s3c64xx_freq_table[i].index]; + dvfs = &s3c64xx_dvfs_table[s3c64xx_freq_table[i].driver_data]; if (freqs.old == freqs.new) return 0; -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258