From d79d32440c33cf60f1e0efbeb8144b1647be0b50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Pannuto Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:12:41 -0700 Subject: driver core: platform: Use drv->driver.bus instead of assuming platform_bus_type In theory (although not *yet* in practice), a driver being passed to platform_driver_probe might have driver.bus set to something other than platform_bus_type. Locking drv->driver.bus is always correct. Signed-off-by: Patrick Pannuto Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/base/platform.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/base') diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c index c6c933f5810..579906f88b0 100644 --- a/drivers/base/platform.c +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c @@ -488,12 +488,12 @@ int __init_or_module platform_driver_probe(struct platform_driver *drv, * if the probe was successful, and make sure any forced probes of * new devices fail. */ - spin_lock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock); + spin_lock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock); drv->probe = NULL; if (code == 0 && list_empty(&drv->driver.p->klist_devices.k_list)) retval = -ENODEV; drv->driver.probe = platform_drv_probe_fail; - spin_unlock(&platform_bus_type.p->klist_drivers.k_lock); + spin_unlock(&drv->driver.bus->p->klist_drivers.k_lock); if (code != retval) platform_driver_unregister(drv); -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258