From 5895ef9a5b746e7cc9ebda50c87fbd11562da0a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:36:26 +0900 Subject: libata: don't check whether to use DMA or not for no data commands There's no reason to check whether to use DMA or not for no data commands. Don't do it. While at it, make local variable using_pio in atapi_xlat() set iff ATAPI_PROT_PIO is going to be used and rename ata_check_atapi_dma() to atapi_check_dma() for consistency. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/ata/libata.h') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h index 4514283937e..1cf803adbc9 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata.h +++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ extern void ata_sg_clean(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc); extern void ata_qc_free(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc); extern void ata_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc); extern void __ata_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc); -extern int ata_check_atapi_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc); +extern int atapi_check_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc); extern void swap_buf_le16(u16 *buf, unsigned int buf_words); extern void ata_dev_init(struct ata_device *dev); extern void ata_link_init(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_link *link, int pmp); -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258