From adfdebceaca988515ecdb557d600fd5ab9da913a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Brownell Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:36:14 -0700 Subject: update Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt Make note of the legacy "probe-the-hardware" drivers, and some APIs that are mostly unused except by such drivers. We probably can't escape having legacy drivers for a while (e.g. old ISA drivers), but we can at least discourage this style code for new drivers, and unless it's unavoidable. Signed-off-by: David Brownell Cc: Andres Salomon Cc: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Russell King Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) (limited to 'Documentation/driver-model') diff --git a/Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt b/Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt index 19c4a6e1367..2a97320ee17 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt +++ b/Documentation/driver-model/platform.txt @@ -96,6 +96,46 @@ System setup also associates those clocks with the device, so that that calls to clk_get(&pdev->dev, clock_name) return them as needed. +Legacy Drivers: Device Probing +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Some drivers are not fully converted to the driver model, because they take +on a non-driver role: the driver registers its platform device, rather than +leaving that for system infrastructure. Such drivers can't be hotplugged +or coldplugged, since those mechanisms require device creation to be in a +different system component than the driver. + +The only "good" reason for this is to handle older system designs which, like +original IBM PCs, rely on error-prone "probe-the-hardware" models for hardware +configuration. Newer systems have largely abandoned that model, in favor of +bus-level support for dynamic configuration (PCI, USB), or device tables +provided by the boot firmware (e.g. PNPACPI on x86). There are too many +conflicting options about what might be where, and even educated guesses by +an operating system will be wrong often enough to make trouble. + +This style of driver is discouraged. If you're updating such a driver, +please try to move the device enumeration to a more appropriate location, +outside the driver. This will usually be cleanup, since such drivers +tend to already have "normal" modes, such as ones using device nodes that +were created by PNP or by platform device setup. + +None the less, there are some APIs to support such legacy drivers. Avoid +using these calls except with such hotplug-deficient drivers. + + struct platform_device *platform_device_alloc( + char *name, unsigned id); + +You can use platform_device_alloc() to dynamically allocate a device, which +you will then initialize with resources and platform_device_register(). +A better solution is usually: + + struct platform_device *platform_device_register_simple( + char *name, unsigned id, + struct resource *res, unsigned nres); + +You can use platform_device_register_simple() as a one-step call to allocate +and register a device. + + Device Naming and Driver Binding ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The platform_device.dev.bus_id is the canonical name for the devices. -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258