From 6e8b8726ad503214ba66e34aed69aff41de33489 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rusty Russell Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:19:32 +0930 Subject: PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO True, it's often used in return statements, but after much bikeshedding it's probably better to have an explicit name. (I tried just putting the IS_ERR check inside PTR_ERR itself and gcc usually generated no more code. But that clashes current expectations of how PTR_ERR behaves, so having a separate function is better). Suggested-by: Julia Lawall Suggested-by: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Julia Lawall Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell --- include/linux/err.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/err.h b/include/linux/err.h index 221fcfb676c..15f92e07245 100644 --- a/include/linux/err.h +++ b/include/linux/err.h @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline void * __must_check ERR_CAST(__force const void *ptr) return (void *) ptr; } -static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(__force const void *ptr) +static inline int __must_check PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(__force const void *ptr) { if (IS_ERR(ptr)) return PTR_ERR(ptr); @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(__force const void *ptr) return 0; } +/* Deprecated */ +#define PTR_RET(p) PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(p) + #endif #endif /* _LINUX_ERR_H */ -- cgit v1.2.3-18-g5258