| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The use of a static buffer in rose2asc() to return its result is not
threadproof and can result in corruption if multiple threads are trying
to use one of the procfs files based on rose2asc().
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet.
AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed
through these nodes.
Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally
due to an improper parameter checking.
rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by
rose_route_frame().
In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection
is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise.
When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame
through an adjacent node given a destination rose address.
However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node
is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the
function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected.
The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by
rose route_frame().
This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted".
If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour
node already connected.
If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL.
In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before.
This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until
destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Commit a3d384029aa304f8f3f5355d35f0ae274454f7cd aka
"[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses"
transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one.
However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work.
Steps to reproduce:
modprobe rose
rmmod rose
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008
printing eip:
c014c664
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1]
PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3)
EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1
eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000
esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28
ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000)
Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00
00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000
f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000
Call Trace:
[<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose]
[<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose]
[<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose]
[<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186
[<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45
[<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99
[<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b
[<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
=======================
Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f
EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Many struct file_operations in the kernel can be "const". Marking them const
moves these to the .rodata section, which avoids false sharing with potential
dirty data. In addition it'll catch accidental writes at compile time to
these shared resources.
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
rose_add_loopback_neigh uses kmalloc and the callers were ignoring the
error value. Rewrite to let the caller deal with the allocation. This
allows the use of static allocation of kmalloc use entirely.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The recent fix 0506d4068bad834aab1141b5dc5e748eb175c6b3 made obvious that
error values were not being propagated through the AX.25 stack. To help
with that this patch marks all kmalloc users in the AX.25, NETROM and
ROSE stacks as __must_check.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Convert all ROSE sysctl time values from jiffies to ms as units.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
