aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/ecryptfs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2011-12-09eCryptfs: Extend array bounds for all filename charsTyler Hicks
commit 0f751e641a71157aa584c2a2e22fda52b52b8a56 upstream. From mhalcrow's original commit message: Characters with ASCII values greater than the size of filename_rev_map[] are valid filename characters. ecryptfs_decode_from_filename() will access kernel memory beyond that array, and ecryptfs_parse_tag_70_packet() will then decrypt those characters. The attacker, using the FNEK of the crafted file, can then re-encrypt the characters to reveal the kernel memory past the end of the filename_rev_map[] array. I expect low security impact since this array is statically allocated in the text area, and the amount of memory past the array that is accessible is limited by the largest possible ASCII filename character. This patch solves the issue reported by mhalcrow but with an implementation suggested by Linus to simply extend the length of filename_rev_map[] to 256. Characters greater than 0x7A are mapped to 0x00, which is how invalid characters less than 0x7A were previously being handled. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Reported-by: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-06-23eCryptfs: Allow 2 scatterlist entries for encrypted filenamesTyler Hicks
commit 8d08dab786ad5cc2aca2bf870de370144b78c85a upstream. The buffers allocated while encrypting and decrypting long filenames can sometimes straddle two pages. In this situation, virt_to_scatterlist() will return -ENOMEM, causing the operation to fail and the user will get scary error messages in their logs: kernel: ecryptfs_write_tag_70_packet: Internal error whilst attempting to convert filename memory to scatterlist; expected rc = 1; got rc = [-12]. block_aligned_filename_size = [272] kernel: ecryptfs_encrypt_filename: Error attempting to generate tag 70 packet; rc = [-12] kernel: ecryptfs_encrypt_and_encode_filename: Error attempting to encrypt filename; rc = [-12] kernel: ecryptfs_lookup: Error attempting to encrypt and encode filename; rc = [-12] The solution is to allow up to 2 scatterlist entries to be used. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-04-14eCryptfs: ecryptfs_keyring_auth_tok_for_sig() bug fixRoberto Sassu
commit 1821df040ac3cd6a57518739f345da6d50ea9d3f upstream. The pointer '(*auth_tok_key)' is set to NULL in case request_key() fails, in order to prevent its use by functions calling ecryptfs_keyring_auth_tok_for_sig(). Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@polito.it> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-04-14eCryptfs: Unlock page in write_begin error pathTyler Hicks
commit 50f198ae16ac66508d4b8d5a40967a8507ad19ee upstream. Unlock the page in error path of ecryptfs_write_begin(). This may happen, for example, if decryption fails while bring the page up-to-date. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-03-02eCryptfs: Copy up lower inode attrs in getattrTyler Hicks
commit 55f9cf6bbaa682958a7dd2755f883b768270c3ce upstream. The lower filesystem may do some type of inode revalidation during a getattr call. eCryptfs should take advantage of that by copying the lower inode attributes to the eCryptfs inode after a call to vfs_getattr() on the lower inode. I originally wrote this fix while working on eCryptfs on nfsv3 support, but discovered it also fixed an eCryptfs on ext4 nanosecond timestamp bug that was reported. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613873 Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-12-09eCryptfs: Clear LOOKUP_OPEN flag when creating lower fileTyler Hicks
commit 2e21b3f124eceb6ab5a07c8a061adce14ac94e14 upstream. eCryptfs was passing the LOOKUP_OPEN flag through to the lower file system, even though ecryptfs_create() doesn't support the flag. A valid filp for the lower filesystem could be returned in the nameidata if the lower file system's create() function supported LOOKUP_OPEN, possibly resulting in unencrypted writes to the lower file. However, this is only a potential problem in filesystems (FUSE, NFS, CIFS, CEPH, 9p) that eCryptfs isn't known to support today. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/641703 Reported-by: Kevin Buhr Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-08-13fs/ecryptfs/file.c: introduce missing freeJulia Lawall
commit ceeab92971e8af05c1e81a4ff2c271124b55bb9b upstream. The comments in the code indicate that file_info should be released if the function fails. This releasing is done at the label out_free, not out. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // <smpl> @r exists@ local idexpression x; statement S; expression E; identifier f,f1,l; position p1,p2; expression *ptr != NULL; @@ x@p1 = kmem_cache_zalloc(...); ... if (x == NULL) S <... when != x when != if (...) { <+...x...+> } ( x->f1 = E | (x->f1 == NULL || ...) | f(...,x->f1,...) ) ...> ( return <+...x...+>; | return@p2 ...; ) @script:python@ p1 << r.p1; p2 << r.p2; @@ print "* file: %s kmem_cache_zalloc %s" % (p1[0].file,p1[0].line) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-08-13ecryptfs: release reference to lower mount if interpose failsLino Sanfilippo
commit 31f73bee3e170b7cabb35db9e2f4bf7919b9d036 upstream. In ecryptfs_lookup_and_interpose_lower() the lower mount is not decremented if allocation of a dentry info struct failed. As a result the lower filesystem cant be unmounted any more (since it is considered busy). This patch corrects the reference counting. Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-08-13eCryptfs: Handle ioctl calls with unlocked and compat functionsTyler Hicks
commit c43f7b8fb03be8bcc579bfc4e6ab70eac887ab55 upstream. Lower filesystems that only implemented unlocked_ioctl weren't being passed ioctl calls because eCryptfs only checked for lower_file->f_op->ioctl and returned -ENOTTY if it was NULL. eCryptfs shouldn't implement ioctl(), since it doesn't require the BKL. This patch introduces ecryptfs_unlocked_ioctl() and ecryptfs_compat_ioctl(), which passes the calls on to the lower file system. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/469664 Reported-by: James Dupin <james.dupin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-08-02ecryptfs: Bugfix for error related to ecryptfs_hash_bucketsAndre Osterhues
commit a6f80fb7b5986fda663d94079d3bba0937a6b6ff upstream. The function ecryptfs_uid_hash wrongly assumes that the second parameter to hash_long() is the number of hash buckets instead of the number of hash bits. This patch fixes that and renames the variable ecryptfs_hash_buckets to ecryptfs_hash_bits to make it clearer. Fixes: CVE-2010-2492 Signed-off-by: Andre Osterhues <aosterhues@escrypt.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-04-26ecryptfs: fix error code for missing xattrs in lower fsChristian Pulvermacher
commit cfce08c6bdfb20ade979284e55001ca1f100ed51 upstream. If the lower file system driver has extended attributes disabled, ecryptfs' own access functions return -ENOSYS instead of -EOPNOTSUPP. This breaks execution of programs in the ecryptfs mount, since the kernel expects the latter error when checking for security capabilities in xattrs. Signed-off-by: Christian Pulvermacher <pulvermacher@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-04-26eCryptfs: Decrypt symlink target for stat sizeTyler Hicks
commit 3a60a1686f0d51c99bd0df8ac93050fb6dfce647 upstream. Create a getattr handler for eCryptfs symlinks that is capable of reading the lower target and decrypting its path. Prior to this patch, a stat's st_size field would represent the strlen of the encrypted path, while readlink() would return the strlen of the decrypted path. This could lead to confusion in some userspace applications, since the two values should be equal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524919 Reported-by: Loïc Minier <loic.minier@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-04-26ecryptfs: fix use with tmpfs by removing d_drop from ecryptfs_destroy_inodeJeff Mahoney
commit 133b8f9d632cc23715c6d72d1c5ac449e054a12a upstream. Since tmpfs has no persistent storage, it pins all its dentries in memory so they have d_count=1 when other file systems would have d_count=0. ->lookup is only used to create new dentries. If the caller doesn't instantiate it, it's freed immediately at dput(). ->readdir reads directly from the dcache and depends on the dentries being hashed. When an ecryptfs mount is mounted, it associates the lower file and dentry with the ecryptfs files as they're accessed. When it's umounted and destroys all the in-memory ecryptfs inodes, it fput's the lower_files and d_drop's the lower_dentries. Commit 4981e081 added this and a d_delete in 2008 and several months later commit caeeeecf removed the d_delete. I believe the d_drop() needs to be removed as well. The d_drop effectively hides any file that has been accessed via ecryptfs from the underlying tmpfs since it depends on it being hashed for it to be accessible. I've removed the d_drop on my development node and see no ill effects with basic testing on both tmpfs and persistent storage. As a side effect, after ecryptfs d_drops the dentries on tmpfs, tmpfs BUGs on umount. This is due to the dentries being unhashed. tmpfs->kill_sb is kill_litter_super which calls d_genocide to drop the reference pinning the dentry. It skips unhashed and negative dentries, but shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree doesn't. Since those dentries still have an elevated d_count, we get a BUG(). This patch removes the d_drop call and fixes both issues. This issue was reported at: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567887 Reported-by: Árpád Bíró <biroa@demasz.hu> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-02-23eCryptfs: Add getattr functionTyler Hicks
commit f8f484d1b6677dd5cd5e7e605db747e8c30bbd47 upstream. The i_blocks field of an eCryptfs inode cannot be trusted, but generic_fillattr() uses it to instantiate the blocks field of a stat() syscall when a filesystem doesn't implement its own getattr(). Users have noticed that the output of du is incorrect on newly created files. This patch creates ecryptfs_getattr() which calls into the lower filesystem's getattr() so that eCryptfs can use its kstat.blocks value after calling generic_fillattr(). It is important to note that the block count includes the eCryptfs metadata stored in the beginning of the lower file plus any padding used to fill an extent before encryption. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/390833 Reported-by: Dominic Sacré <dominic.sacre@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tim Gardner <timg@tpi.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-01-25ecryptfs: initialize private persistent file before dereferencing pointerErez Zadok
commit e27759d7a333d1f25d628c4f7caf845c51be51c2 upstream. Ecryptfs_open dereferences a pointer to the private lower file (the one stored in the ecryptfs inode), without checking if the pointer is NULL. Right afterward, it initializes that pointer if it is NULL. Swap order of statements to first initialize. Bug discovered by Duckjin Kang. Signed-off-by: Duckjin Kang <fromdj2k@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-01-25ecryptfs: use after freeDan Carpenter
commit ece550f51ba175c14ec3ec047815927d7386ea1f upstream. The "full_alg_name" variable is used on a couple error paths, so we shouldn't free it until the end. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2009-10-08ima: ecryptfs fix imbalance messageMimi Zohar
The unencrypted files are being measured. Update the counters to get rid of the ecryptfs imbalance message. (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/519737) Reported-by: Sachin Garg Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: David Safford <safford@watson.ibm.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-10-08eCryptfs: Remove Kconfig NET dependency and select MD5Tyler Hicks
eCryptfs no longer uses a netlink interface to communicate with ecryptfsd, so NET is not a valid dependency anymore. MD5 is required and must be built for eCryptfs to be of any use. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-10-08ecryptfs: depends on CRYPTORandy Dunlap
ecryptfs uses crypto APIs so it should depend on CRYPTO. Otherwise many build errors occur. [63 lines not pasted] Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23eCryptfs: Prevent lower dentry from going negative during unlinkTyler Hicks
When calling vfs_unlink() on the lower dentry, d_delete() turns the dentry into a negative dentry when the d_count is 1. This eventually caused a NULL pointer deref when a read() or write() was done and the negative dentry's d_inode was dereferenced in ecryptfs_read_update_atime() or ecryptfs_getxattr(). Placing mutt's tmpdir in an eCryptfs mount is what initially triggered the oops and I was able to reproduce it with the following sequence: open("/tmp/upper/foo", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_NOFOLLOW, 0600) = 3 link("/tmp/upper/foo", "/tmp/upper/bar") = 0 unlink("/tmp/upper/foo") = 0 open("/tmp/upper/bar", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_NOFOLLOW, 0600) = 4 unlink("/tmp/upper/bar") = 0 write(4, "eCryptfs test\n"..., 14 <unfinished ...> +++ killed by SIGKILL +++ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/387073 Reported-by: Loïc Minier <loic.minier@canonical.com> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23eCryptfs: Propagate vfs_read and vfs_write return codesTyler Hicks
Errors returned from vfs_read() and vfs_write() calls to the lower filesystem were being masked as -EINVAL. This caused some confusion to users who saw EINVAL instead of ENOSPC when the disk was full, for instance. Also, the actual bytes read or written were not accessible by callers to ecryptfs_read_lower() and ecryptfs_write_lower(), which may be useful in some cases. This patch updates the error handling logic where those functions are called in order to accept positive return codes indicating success. Cc: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23eCryptfs: Validate global auth tok keysTyler Hicks
When searching through the global authentication tokens for a given key signature, verify that a matching key has not been revoked and has not expired. This allows the `keyctl revoke` command to be properly used on keys in use by eCryptfs. Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23eCryptfs: Filename encryption only supports password auth tokensTyler Hicks
Returns -ENOTSUPP when attempting to use filename encryption with something other than a password authentication token, such as a private token from openssl. Using filename encryption with a userspace eCryptfs key module is a future goal. Until then, this patch handles the situation a little better than simply using a BUG_ON(). Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23eCryptfs: Check for O_RDONLY lower inodes when opening lower filesTyler Hicks
If the lower inode is read-only, don't attempt to open the lower file read/write and don't hand off the open request to the privileged eCryptfs kthread for opening it read/write. Instead, only try an unprivileged, read-only open of the file and give up if that fails. This patch fixes an oops when eCryptfs is mounted on top of a read-only mount. Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23eCryptfs: Handle unrecognized tag 3 cipher codesTyler Hicks
Returns an error when an unrecognized cipher code is present in a tag 3 packet or an ecryptfs_crypt_stat cannot be initialized. Also sets an crypt_stat->tfm error pointer to NULL to ensure that it will not be incorrectly freed in ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat(). Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23ecryptfs: improved dependency checking and reportingDave Hansen
So, I compiled a 2.6.31-rc5 kernel with ecryptfs and loaded its module. When it came time to mount my filesystem, I got this in dmesg, and it refused to mount: [93577.776637] Unable to allocate crypto cipher with name [aes]; rc = [-2] [93577.783280] Error attempting to initialize key TFM cipher with name = [aes]; rc = [-2] [93577.791183] Error attempting to initialize cipher with name = [aes] and key size = [32]; rc = [-2] [93577.800113] Error parsing options; rc = [-22] I figured from the error message that I'd either forgotten to load "aes" or that my key size was bogus. Neither one of those was the case. In fact, I was missing the CRYPTO_ECB config option and the 'ecb' module. Unfortunately, there's no trace of 'ecb' in that error message. I've done two things to fix this. First, I've modified ecryptfs's Kconfig entry to select CRYPTO_ECB and CRYPTO_CBC. I also took CRYPTO out of the dependencies since the 'select' will take care of it for us. I've also modified the error messages to print a string that should contain both 'ecb' and 'aes' in my error case. That will give any future users a chance of finding the right modules and Kconfig options. I also wonder if we should: select CRYPTO_AES if !EMBEDDED since I think most ecryptfs users are using AES like me. Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com: Removed extra newline, 80-char violation] Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23eCryptfs: Fix lockdep-reported AB-BA mutex issueRoland Dreier
Lockdep reports the following valid-looking possible AB-BA deadlock with global_auth_tok_list_mutex and keysig_list_mutex: ecryptfs_new_file_context() -> ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs() -> mutex_lock(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex); -> ecryptfs_add_keysig() -> mutex_lock(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex); vs ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set() -> mutex_lock(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex); -> ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig() -> mutex_lock(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex); ie the two mutexes are taken in opposite orders in the two different code paths. I'm not sure if this is a real bug where two threads could actually hit the two paths in parallel and deadlock, but it at least makes lockdep impossible to use with ecryptfs since this report triggers every time and disables future lockdep reporting. Since ecryptfs_add_keysig() is called only from the single callsite in ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs(), the simplest fix seems to be to move the lock of keysig_list_mutex back up outside of the where global_auth_tok_list_mutex is taken. This patch does that, and fixes the lockdep report on my system (and ecryptfs still works OK). The full output of lockdep fixed by this patch is: ======================================================= [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd2 ------------------------------------------------------- gdm/2640 is trying to acquire lock: (&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90 but task is already holding lock: (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81217728>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x58/0x2b0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}: [<ffffffff8108c897>] check_prev_add+0x2a7/0x370 [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750 [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430 [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150 [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0 [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60 [<ffffffff8121526a>] ecryptfs_add_keysig+0x5a/0xb0 [<ffffffff81213299>] ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs+0x59/0xb0 [<ffffffff81214b06>] ecryptfs_new_file_context+0xa6/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8120e42a>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x4a/0x140 [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60 [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0 [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110 [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0 [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140 [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30 [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff -> #0 (&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex){+.+.+.}: [<ffffffff8108c675>] check_prev_add+0x85/0x370 [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750 [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430 [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150 [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0 [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90 [<ffffffff812177d5>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x105/0x2b0 [<ffffffff81212f49>] ecryptfs_write_headers_virt+0xc9/0x120 [<ffffffff8121306d>] ecryptfs_write_metadata+0xcd/0x200 [<ffffffff8120e44b>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x6b/0x140 [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60 [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0 [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110 [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0 [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140 [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30 [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by gdm/2640: #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113cb8b>] do_filp_open+0x3cb/0xae0 #1: (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81217728>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x58/0x2b0 stack backtrace: Pid: 2640, comm: gdm Tainted: G C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd2 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8108b988>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xa8/0xf0 [<ffffffff8108c675>] check_prev_add+0x85/0x370 [<ffffffff81094912>] ? __module_text_address+0x12/0x60 [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750 [<ffffffff81017275>] ? print_context_stack+0x85/0x140 [<ffffffff81089c68>] ? find_usage_backwards+0x38/0x160 [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430 [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90 [<ffffffff8108b0b0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x0/0xb0 [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90 [<ffffffff8108c02c>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0 [<ffffffff81125b0d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xfd/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8108c34d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14d/0x190 [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90 [<ffffffff812177d5>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x105/0x2b0 [<ffffffff81212f49>] ecryptfs_write_headers_virt+0xc9/0x120 [<ffffffff8121306d>] ecryptfs_write_metadata+0xcd/0x200 [<ffffffff81210240>] ? ecryptfs_init_persistent_file+0x60/0xe0 [<ffffffff8120e44b>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x6b/0x140 [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60 [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0 [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110 [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0 [<ffffffff8129a93e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0 [<ffffffff8155410b>] ? _spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40 [<ffffffff81139e9b>] ? getname+0x3b/0x240 [<ffffffff81148a5a>] ? alloc_fd+0xfa/0x140 [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140 [<ffffffff81553b8f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30 [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-23ecryptfs: Remove unneeded locking that triggers lockdep false positivesRoland Dreier
In ecryptfs_destroy_inode(), inode_info->lower_file_mutex is locked, and just after the mutex is unlocked, the code does: kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_inode_info_cache, inode_info); This means that if another context could possibly try to take the same mutex as ecryptfs_destroy_inode(), then it could end up getting the mutex just before the data structure containing the mutex is freed. So any such use would be an obvious use-after-free bug (catchable with slab poisoning or mutex debugging), and therefore the locking in ecryptfs_destroy_inode() is not needed and can be dropped. Similarly, in ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat(), crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex is locked, and then the mutex is unlocked just before the code does: memset(crypt_stat, 0, sizeof(struct ecryptfs_crypt_stat)); Therefore taking this mutex is similarly not necessary. Removing this locking fixes false-positive lockdep reports such as the following (and they are false-positives for exactly the same reason that the locking is not needed): ================================= [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd3 --------------------------------- inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage. kswapd0/323 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (&inode_info->lower_file_mutex){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff81210d34>] ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100 {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at: [<ffffffff8108c02c>] mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0 [<ffffffff8108c10f>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xaf/0xe0 [<ffffffff81125a51>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x41/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8113117a>] get_empty_filp+0x7a/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8112dd46>] dentry_open+0x36/0xc0 [<ffffffff8121a36c>] ecryptfs_privileged_open+0x5c/0x2e0 [<ffffffff81210283>] ecryptfs_init_persistent_file+0xa3/0xe0 [<ffffffff8120e838>] ecryptfs_lookup_and_interpose_lower+0x278/0x380 [<ffffffff8120f97a>] ecryptfs_lookup+0x12a/0x250 [<ffffffff8113930a>] real_lookup+0xea/0x160 [<ffffffff8113afc8>] do_lookup+0xb8/0xf0 [<ffffffff8113b518>] __link_path_walk+0x518/0x870 [<ffffffff8113bd9c>] path_walk+0x5c/0xc0 [<ffffffff8113be5b>] do_path_lookup+0x5b/0xa0 [<ffffffff8113bfe7>] user_path_at+0x57/0xa0 [<ffffffff811340dc>] vfs_fstatat+0x3c/0x80 [<ffffffff8113424b>] vfs_stat+0x1b/0x20 [<ffffffff81134274>] sys_newstat+0x24/0x50 [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff irq event stamp: 7811 hardirqs last enabled at (7811): [<ffffffff810c037f>] call_rcu+0x5f/0x90 hardirqs last disabled at (7810): [<ffffffff810c0353>] call_rcu+0x33/0x90 softirqs last enabled at (3764): [<ffffffff810631da>] __do_softirq+0x14a/0x220 softirqs last disabled at (3751): [<ffffffff8101440c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by kswapd0/323: #0: (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff810f67ed>] shrink_slab+0x3d/0x190 #1: (&type->s_umount_key#35){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff811429a1>] prune_dcache+0xd1/0x1b0 stack backtrace: Pid: 323, comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd3 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8108ad6c>] print_usage_bug+0x18c/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8108aff0>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xc0 [<ffffffff8108bac2>] mark_lock_irq+0xf2/0x280 [<ffffffff8108bd87>] mark_lock+0x137/0x1d0 [<ffffffff81164710>] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0x30/0xf0 [<ffffffff8108bee6>] mark_irqflags+0xc6/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8108d337>] __lock_acquire+0x287/0x430 [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100 [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] ? __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430 [<ffffffff815526ad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100 [<ffffffff81164710>] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0x30/0xf0 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100 [<ffffffff8129a91e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0 [<ffffffff81552b36>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100 [<ffffffff81145d27>] destroy_inode+0x87/0xd0 [<ffffffff81146b4c>] generic_delete_inode+0x12c/0x1a0 [<ffffffff81145832>] iput+0x62/0x70 [<ffffffff811423c8>] dentry_iput+0x98/0x110 [<ffffffff81142550>] d_kill+0x50/0x80 [<ffffffff81142623>] prune_one_dentry+0xa3/0xc0 [<ffffffff811428b1>] __shrink_dcache_sb+0x271/0x290 [<ffffffff811429d9>] prune_dcache+0x109/0x1b0 [<ffffffff81142abf>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x3f/0x50 [<ffffffff810f68dd>] shrink_slab+0x12d/0x190 [<ffffffff810f9377>] balance_pgdat+0x4d7/0x640 [<ffffffff8104c4c0>] ? finish_task_switch+0x40/0x150 [<ffffffff810f63c0>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x60 [<ffffffff810f95f7>] kswapd+0x117/0x170 [<ffffffff810777a0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 [<ffffffff810f94e0>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x170 [<ffffffff810773be>] kthread+0x9e/0xb0 [<ffffffff8101430a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20 [<ffffffff81013c90>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30 [<ffffffff81077320>] ? kthread+0x0/0xb0 [<ffffffff81014300>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20 Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@digitalvampire.org> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-09-22const: mark remaining address_space_operations constAlexey Dobriyan
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-07-28eCryptfs: parse_tag_3_packet check tag 3 packet encrypted key sizeRamon de Carvalho Valle
The parse_tag_3_packet function does not check if the tag 3 packet contains a encrypted key size larger than ECRYPTFS_MAX_ENCRYPTED_KEY_BYTES. Signed-off-by: Ramon de Carvalho Valle <ramon@risesecurity.org> [tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com: Added printk newline and changed goto to out_free] Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org (2.6.27 and 30) Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-07-28eCryptfs: Check Tag 11 literal data buffer sizeTyler Hicks
Tag 11 packets are stored in the metadata section of an eCryptfs file to store the key signature(s) used to encrypt the file encryption key. After extracting the packet length field to determine the key signature length, a check is not performed to see if the length would exceed the key signature buffer size that was passed into parse_tag_11_packet(). Thanks to Ramon de Carvalho Valle for finding this bug using fsfuzzer. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org (2.6.27 and 30) Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-06-11push BKL down into ->put_superChristoph Hellwig
Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller. A couple of filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs, hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment. Most of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually. Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area. [AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super() now] [AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-05-09Convert obvious places to deactivate_locked_super()Al Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-04-27eCryptfs: Fix min function comparison warningTyler Hicks
This warning shows up on 64 bit builds: fs/ecryptfs/inode.c:693: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-04-27ecryptfs: fix printk format warningRandy Dunlap
fs/ecryptfs/inode.c:670: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2009-04-22eCryptfs: Larger buffer for encrypted symlink targetsTyler Hicks
When using filename encryption with eCryptfs, the value of the symlink in the lower filesystem is encrypted and stored as a Tag 70 packet. This results in a longer symlink target than if the target value wasn't encrypted. Users were reporting these messages in their syslog: [ 45.653441] ecryptfs_parse_tag_70_packet: max_packet_size is [56]; real packet size is [51] [ 45.653444] ecryptfs_decode_and_decrypt_filename: Could not parse tag 70 packet from filename; copying through filename as-is This was due to bufsiz, one the arguments in readlink(), being used to when allocating the buffer passed to the lower inode's readlink(). That symlink target may be very large, but when decoded and decrypted, could end up being smaller than bufsize. To fix this, the buffer passed to the lower inode's readlink() will always be PATH_MAX in size when filename encryption is enabled. Any necessary truncation occurs after the decoding and decrypting. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-04-22eCryptfs: Lock lower directory inode mutex during lookupTyler Hicks
This patch locks the lower directory inode's i_mutex before calling lookup_one_len() to find the appropriate dentry in the lower filesystem. This bug was found thanks to the warning set in commit 2f9092e1. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-04-22eCryptfs: Remove ecryptfs_unlink_sigs warningsTyler Hicks
A feature was added to the eCryptfs umount helper to automatically unlink the keys used for an eCryptfs mount from the kernel keyring upon umount. This patch keeps the unrecognized mount option warnings for ecryptfs_unlink_sigs out of the logs. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-04-22eCryptfs: Fix data corruption when using ecryptfs_passthroughTyler Hicks
ecryptfs_passthrough is a mount option that allows eCryptfs to allow data to be written to non-eCryptfs files in the lower filesystem. The passthrough option was causing data corruption due to it not always being treated as a non-eCryptfs file. The first 8 bytes of an eCryptfs file contains the decrypted file size. This value was being written to the non-eCryptfs files, too. Also, extra 0x00 characters were being written to make the file size a multiple of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-04-22eCryptfs: Print FNEK sig properly in /proc/mountsTyler Hicks
The filename encryption key signature is not properly displayed in /proc/mounts. The "ecryptfs_sig=" mount option name is displayed for all global authentication tokens, included those for filename keys. This patch checks the global authentication token flags to determine if the key is a FEKEK or FNEK and prints the appropriate mount option name before the signature. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-04-22eCryptfs: NULL pointer dereference in ecryptfs_send_miscdev()Tyler Hicks
If data is NULL, msg_ctx->msg is set to NULL and then dereferenced afterwards. ecryptfs_send_raw_message() is the only place that ecryptfs_send_miscdev() is called with data being NULL, but the only caller of that function (ecryptfs_process_helo()) is never called. In short, there is currently no way to trigger the NULL pointer dereference. This patch removes the two unused functions and modifies ecryptfs_send_miscdev() to remove the NULL dereferences. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-04-22eCryptfs: Copy lower inode attrs before dentry instantiationTyler Hicks
Copies the lower inode attributes to the upper inode before passing the upper inode to d_instantiate(). This is important for security_d_instantiate(). The problem was discovered by a user seeing SELinux denials like so: type=AVC msg=audit(1236812817.898:47): avc: denied { 0x100000 } for pid=3584 comm="httpd" name="testdir" dev=ecryptfs ino=943872 scontext=root:system_r:httpd_t:s0 tcontext=root:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file Notice target class is file while testdir is really a directory, confusing the permission translation (0x100000) due to the wrong i_mode. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2009-04-20ecryptfs: use memdup_user()Li Zefan
Remove open-coded memdup_user(). Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-04-01ecryptfs: use kzfree()Johannes Weiner
Use kzfree() instead of memset() + kfree(). Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Acked-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-27constify dentry_operations: ecryptfsAl Viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2009-03-22eCryptfs: NULL crypt_stat dereference during lookupTyler Hicks
If ecryptfs_encrypted_view or ecryptfs_xattr_metadata were being specified as mount options, a NULL pointer dereference of crypt_stat was possible during lookup. This patch moves the crypt_stat assignment into ecryptfs_lookup_and_interpose_lower(), ensuring that crypt_stat will not be NULL before we attempt to dereference it. Thanks to Dan Carpenter and his static analysis tool, smatch, for finding this bug. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-22eCryptfs: Allocate a variable number of pages for file headersTyler Hicks
When allocating the memory used to store the eCryptfs header contents, a single, zeroed page was being allocated with get_zeroed_page(). However, the size of an eCryptfs header is either PAGE_CACHE_SIZE or ECRYPTFS_MINIMUM_HEADER_EXTENT_SIZE (8192), whichever is larger, and is stored in the file's private_data->crypt_stat->num_header_bytes_at_front field. ecryptfs_write_metadata_to_contents() was using num_header_bytes_at_front to decide how many bytes should be written to the lower filesystem for the file header. Unfortunately, at least 8K was being written from the page, despite the chance of the single, zeroed page being smaller than 8K. This resulted in random areas of kernel memory being written between the 0x1000 and 0x1FFF bytes offsets in the eCryptfs file headers if PAGE_SIZE was 4K. This patch allocates a variable number of pages, calculated with num_header_bytes_at_front, and passes the number of allocated pages along to ecryptfs_write_metadata_to_contents(). Thanks to Florian Streibelt for reporting the data leak and working with me to find the problem. 2.6.28 is the only kernel release with this vulnerability. Corresponds to CVE-2009-0787 Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@kernel.sg> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Cc: dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Florian Streibelt <florian@f-streibelt.de> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-14eCryptfs: don't encrypt file key with filename keyTyler Hicks
eCryptfs has file encryption keys (FEK), file encryption key encryption keys (FEKEK), and filename encryption keys (FNEK). The per-file FEK is encrypted with one or more FEKEKs and stored in the header of the encrypted file. I noticed that the FEK is also being encrypted by the FNEK. This is a problem if a user wants to use a different FNEK than their FEKEK, as their file contents will still be accessible with the FNEK. This is a minimalistic patch which prevents the FNEKs signatures from being copied to the inode signatures list. Ultimately, it keeps the FEK from being encrypted with a FNEK. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-02-06eCryptfs: Regression in unencrypted filename symlinksTyler Hicks
The addition of filename encryption caused a regression in unencrypted filename symlink support. ecryptfs_copy_filename() is used when dealing with unencrypted filenames and it reported that the new, copied filename was a character longer than it should have been. This caused the return value of readlink() to count the NULL byte of the symlink target. Most applications don't care about the extra NULL byte, but a version control system (bzr) helped in discovering the bug. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-22fs/Kconfig: move ecryptfs outAlexey Dobriyan
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>