| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
commit f4881bc7a83eff263789dd524b7c269d138d4af5 upstream.
Dave reported a warning when running xfstest 275. We have been leaking delalloc
metadata space when our reservations fail. This is because we were improperly
calculating how much space to free for our checksum reservations. The problem
is we would sometimes free up space that had already been freed in another
thread and we would end up with negative usage for the delalloc space. This
patch fixes the problem by calculating how much space the other threads would
have already freed, and then calculate how much space we need to free had we not
done the reservation at all, and then freeing any excess space. This makes
xfstests 275 no longer have leaked space. Thanks
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: CAI Qian <caiqian@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit d8fe29e9dea8d7d61fd140d8779326856478fc62 upstream.
A user reported a panic where we were panicing somewhere in
tree_backref_for_extent from scrub_print_warning. He only captured the trace
but looking at scrub_print_warning we drop the path right before we mess with
the extent buffer to print out a bunch of stuff, which isn't right. So fix this
by dropping the path after we use the eb if we need to. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit fdf30d1c1b386e1b73116cc7e0fb14e962b763b0 upstream.
A user reported a problem where he was getting early ENOSPC with hundreds of
gigs of free data space and 6 gigs of free metadata space. This is because the
global block reserve was taking up the entire free metadata space. This is
ridiculous, we have infrastructure in place to throttle if we start using too
much of the global reserve, so instead of letting it get this huge just limit it
to 512mb so that users can still get work done. This allowed the user to
complete his rsync without issues. Thanks
Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 4adaa611020fa6ac65b0ac8db78276af4ec04e63 upstream.
Btrfs uses page_mkwrite to ensure stable pages during
crc calculations and mmap workloads. We call clear_page_dirty_for_io
before we do any crcs, and this forces any application with the file
mapped to wait for the crc to finish before it is allowed to change
the file.
With compression on, the clear_page_dirty_for_io step is happening after
we've compressed the pages. This means the applications might be
changing the pages while we are compressing them, and some of those
modifications might not hit the disk.
This commit adds the clear_page_dirty_for_io before compression starts
and makes sure to redirty the page if we have to fallback to
uncompressed IO as well.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit d9abbf1c3131b679379762700201ae69367f3f62 upstream.
To resolve backrefs, ROOT_REPLACE operations in the tree mod log are
required to be tied to at least one KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operation.
Therefore, those operations must be enclosed by tree_mod_log_write_lock()
and tree_mod_log_write_unlock() calls.
Those calls are private to the tree_mod_log_* functions, which means that
removal of the elements of an old root node must be logged from
tree_mod_log_insert_root. This partly reverts and corrects commit ba1bfbd5
(Btrfs: fix a tree mod logging issue for root replacement operations).
This fixes the brand-new version of xfstest 276 as of commit cfe73f71.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 9bf7a4890518186238d2579be16ecc5190a707c0 upstream.
We need to inc the nlink of deleted entries when running replay so we can do the
unlink on the fs_root and get everything cleaned up and then have the orphan
cleanup do the right thing. The problem is inc_nlink complains about this, even
thought it still does the right thing. So use set_nlink() if our i_nlink is 0
to keep users from seeing the warnings during log replay. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit bc178622d40d87e75abc131007342429c9b03351 upstream.
Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me:
# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2
...
unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy
because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it.
Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a
blkdev put after mkfs attempts a get; this is left over from the unmount
path:
btrfs_close_devices
__btrfs_close_devices
call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device);
free_device
INIT_WORK(&device->rcu_work, __free_device);
schedule_work(&device->rcu_work);
so unmount might complete before __free_device fires & does its blkdev_put.
Adding an rcu_barrier() to btrfs_close_devices() causes unmount to wait
until all blkdev_put()s are done, and the device is truly free once
unmount completes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 4a7d0f6854c4a4ad1dba00a3b128a32d39b9a742 upstream.
I noticed we were getting lots of warnings with xfstest 83 because we have
reservations outstanding. This is because we moved the orphan add outside
of the truncate, but we don't actually cleanup our reservation if something
fails. This fixes the problem and I no longer see warnings. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 925396ecf251432d6d0f703a6cfd0cb9e651d936 upstream.
Dave sent me a panic where we were doing the orphan cleanup and panic'ed
trying to release our reservation from the orphan block rsv. The reason for
this is because our orphan block rsv had been free'd out from underneath us
because the transaction commit found that there were no orphan inodes
according to its count and decided to free it. This is incorrect so make
sure we inc the orphan inodes count so the accounting is all done properly.
This would also cause the warning in the orphan commit code normally if you
had any orphans to cleanup as they would only decrement the orphan count so
you'd get a negative orphan count which could cause problems during runtime.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 124fe663f93162d17b7e391705cac122101e93d8 upstream.
Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk
of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a
btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item.
This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents
since we expect for it to be the right size. To fix this just delete the item
and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized
btrfs_file_extent_item. This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer
would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit bdc20e67e82cfc4901d3a5a0d79104b0e2296d83 upstream.
I noticed while looking into a tree logging bug that we aren't logging inline
extents properly. Since this requires copying and it shouldn't happen too often
just force us to copy everything for the inode into the tree log when we have an
inline extent. With this patch we have valid data after a crash when we write
an inline extent. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 1cba0cdf5e4dbcd9e5fa5b54d7a028e55e2ca057 upstream.
__btrfs_close_devices() clones btrfs device structs with
memcpy(). Some of the fields in the clone are reinitialized, but it's
missing to init io_lock. In mainline this goes unnoticed, but on RT it
leaves the plist pointing to the original about to be freed lock
struct.
Initialize io_lock after cloning, so no references to the original
struct are left.
Reported-and-tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"We've got corner cases for updating i_size that ceph was hitting,
error handling for quotas when we run out of space, a very subtle
snapshot deletion race, a crash while removing devices, and one
deadlock between subvolume creation and the sb_internal code (thanks
lockdep)."
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
Btrfs: move d_instantiate outside the transaction during mksubvol
Btrfs: fix EDQUOT handling in btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata
Btrfs: fix possible stale data exposure
Btrfs: fix missing i_size update
Btrfs: fix race between snapshot deletion and getting inode
Btrfs: fix missing release of the space/qgroup reservation in start_transaction()
Btrfs: fix wrong sync_writers decrement in btrfs_file_aio_write()
Btrfs: do not merge logged extents if we've removed them from the tree
btrfs: don't try to notify udev about missing devices
|
|
Dave Sterba triggered a lockdep complaint about lock ordering
between the sb_internal lock and the cleaner semaphore.
btrfs_lookup_dentry() checks for orphans if we're looking up
the inode for a subvolume, and subvolume creation is triggering
the lookup with a transaction running.
This commit moves the d_instantiate after the transaction closes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
|
|
When btrfs_qgroup_reserve returned a failure, we were missing a counter
operation for BTRFS_I(inode)->outstanding_extents++, leading to warning
messages about outstanding extents and space_info->bytes_may_use != 0.
Additionally, the error handling code didn't take into account that we
dropped the inode lock which might require more cleanup.
Luckily, all the cleanup code we need is already there and can be shared
with reserve_metadata_bytes, which is exactly what this patch does.
Reported-by: Lev Vainblat <lev@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
|
|
for-chris into for-linus
|
|
We specifically do not update the disk i_size if there are ordered extents
outstanding for any area between the current disk_i_size and our ordered
extent so that we do not expose stale data. The problem is the check we
have only checks if the ordered extent starts at or after the current
disk_i_size, which doesn't take into account an ordered extent that starts
before the current disk_i_size and ends past the disk_i_size. Fix this by
checking if the extent ends past the disk_i_size. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
If we have an ordered extent before the ordered extent we are currently
completing that is after the current disk_i_size we will put our i_size
update into that ordered extent so that we do not expose stale data. The
problem is that if our disk i_size is updated past the previous ordered
extent we won't update the i_size with the pending i_size update. So check
the pending i_size update and if its above the current disk i_size we need
to go ahead and try to update. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
While running snapshot testscript created by Mitch and David,
the race between autodefrag and snapshot deletion can lead to
corruption of dead_root list so that we can get crash on
btrfs_clean_old_snapshots().
And besides autodefrag, scrub also does the same thing, ie. read
root first and get inode.
Here is the story(take autodefrag as an example):
(1) when we delete a snapshot or subvolume, it will set its root's
refs to zero and do a iput() on its own inode, and if this inode happens
to be the only active in-meory one in root's inode rbtree, it will add
itself to the global dead_roots list for later cleanup.
(2) after (1), the autodefrag thread may read another inode for defrag
and the inode is just in the deleted snapshot/subvolume, but all of these
are without checking if the root is still valid(refs > 0). So the end up
result is adding the deleted snapshot/subvolume's root to the global
dead_roots list AGAIN.
Fortunately, we already have a srcu lock to avoid the race, ie. subvol_srcu.
So all we need to do is to take the lock to protect 'read root and get inode',
since we synchronize to wait for the rcu grace period before adding something
to the global dead_roots list.
Reported-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
start_transaction()
When we fail to start a transaction, we need to release the reserved free space
and qgroup space, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
If the checks at the beginning of btrfs_file_aio_write() fail, we needn't
decrease ->sync_writers, because we have not increased it. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
You can run into this problem where if somebody is fsyncing and writing out
the existing extents you will have removed the extent map from the em tree,
but it's still valid for the current fsync so we go ahead and write it. The
problem is we unconditionally try to merge it back into the em tree, but if
we've removed it from the em tree that will cause use after free problems.
Fix this to only merge if we are still a part of the tree. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
If we remove a missing device, bdev is null, and if we
send that off to btrfs_kobject_uevent we'll panic.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
Pull btrfs fixes from Chris Mason:
"It turns out that we had two crc bugs when running fsx-linux in a
loop. Many thanks to Josef, Miao Xie, and Dave Sterba for nailing it
all down. Miao also has a new OOM fix in this v2 pull as well.
Ilya fixed a regression Liu Bo found in the balance ioctls for pausing
and resuming a running balance across drives.
Josef's orphan truncate patch fixes an obscure corruption we'd see
during xfstests.
Arne's patches address problems with subvolume quotas. If the user
destroys quota groups incorrectly the FS will refuse to mount.
The rest are smaller fixes and plugs for memory leaks."
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (30 commits)
Btrfs: fix repeated delalloc work allocation
Btrfs: fix wrong max device number for single profile
Btrfs: fix missed transaction->aborted check
Btrfs: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to transaction->abort accesses
Btrfs: put csums on the right ordered extent
Btrfs: use right range to find checksum for compressed extents
Btrfs: fix panic when recovering tree log
Btrfs: do not allow logged extents to be merged or removed
Btrfs: fix a regression in balance usage filter
Btrfs: prevent qgroup destroy when there are still relations
Btrfs: ignore orphan qgroup relations
Btrfs: reorder locks and sanity checks in btrfs_ioctl_defrag
Btrfs: fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev
Btrfs: fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_resize
Btrfs: fix "mutually exclusive op is running" error code
Btrfs: bring back balance pause/resume logic
btrfs: update timestamps on truncate()
btrfs: fix btrfs_cont_expand() freeing IS_ERR em
Btrfs: fix a bug when llseek for delalloc bytes behind prealloc extents
Btrfs: fix off-by-one in lseek
...
|
|
btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes() locks the delalloc_inodes list, fetches the
first inode, unlocks the list, triggers btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work/
btrfs_queue_worker for this inode, and then it locks the list, checks the
head of the list again. But because we don't delete the first inode that it
deals with before, it will fetch the same inode. As a result, this function
allocates a huge amount of btrfs_delalloc_work structures, and OOM happens.
Fix this problem by splice this delalloc list.
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.btrfs@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
The max device number of single profile is 1, not 0 (0 means 'as many as
possible'). Fix it.
Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
First, though the current transaction->aborted check can stop the commit early
and avoid unnecessary operations, it is too early, and some transaction handles
don't end, those handles may set transaction->aborted after the check.
Second, when we commit the transaction, we will wake up some worker threads to
flush the space cache and inode cache. Those threads also allocate some transaction
handles and may set transaction->aborted if some serious error happens.
So we need more check for ->aborted when committing the transaction. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
We may access and update transaction->aborted on the different CPUs without
lock, so we need ACCESS_ONCE() wrapper to prevent the compiler from creating
unsolicited accesses and make sure we can get the right value.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
I noticed a WARN_ON going off when adding csums because we were going over
the amount of csum bytes that should have been allowed for an ordered
extent. This is a leftover from when we used to hold the csums privately
for direct io, but now we use the normal ordered sum stuff so we need to
make sure and check if we've moved on to another extent so that the csums
are added to the right extent. Without this we could end up with csums for
bytenrs that don't have extents to cover them yet. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
For compressed extents, the range of checksum is covered by disk length,
and the disk length is different with ram length, so we need to use disk
length instead to get us the right checksum.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
A user reported a BUG_ON(ret) that occured during tree log replay. Ret was
-EAGAIN, so what I think happened is that we removed an extent that covered
a bitmap entry and an extent entry. We remove the part from the bitmap and
return -EAGAIN and then search for the next piece we want to remove, which
happens to be an entire extent entry, so we just free the sucker and return.
The problem is ret is still set to -EAGAIN so we trip the BUG_ON(). The
user used btrfs-zero-log so I'm not 100% sure this is what happened so I've
added a WARN_ON() to catch the other possibility. Thanks,
Reported-by: Jan Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
We drop the extent map tree lock while we're logging extents, so somebody
could come in and merge another extent into this one and screw up our
logging, or they could even remove us from the list which would keep us from
logging the extent or freeing our ref on it, so we need to make sure to not
clear LOGGING until after the extent is logged, and then we can merge it to
adjacent extents. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
Commit 3fed40cc ("Btrfs: cleanup duplicated division functions"), which
was merged into 3.8-rc1, has introduced a regression by removing logic
that was guarding us against bad user input. Bring it back.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
|
|
git://github.com/idryomov/btrfs-unstable into linus
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into linus
|
|
Currently you can just destroy a qgroup even though it is in use by other qgroups
or has qgroups assigned to it. This patch prevents destruction of qgroups unless
they are completely unused. Otherwise destroy will return EBUSY.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org>
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
|
|
If a qgroup that has still assignments is deleted by the user, the corresponding
relations are left in the tree. This leads to an unmountable filesystem.
With this patch, those relations are simple ignored.
Reported-by: Eric Hopper <hopper@omnifarious.org>
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
|
|
Operation-specific check (whether subvol is readonly or not) should go
after the mutual exclusiveness check.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev().
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_resize().
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
|
The error code that is returned in response to starting a mutually
exclusive operation when there is one already running got silently
changed from EINVAL to EINPROGRESS by 5ac00add. Returning EINPROGRESS
to, say, add_dev, when rm_dev is running is misleading. Furthermore,
the operation itself may want to use EINPROGRESS for other purposes.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
|
Balance pause/resume logic got broken by 5ac00add (went in into 3.8-rc1
as part of dev-replace merge). Offending commit took a stab at making
mutually exclusive volume operations (add_dev, rm_dev, resize, balance,
replace_dev) not block behind volume_mutex if another such operation is
in progress and instead return an error right away. Balancing front-end
relied on the blocking behaviour, so the fix is ugly, but short of a
complete rework, it's the best we can do.
Reported-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
|
truncate() vs. ftruncate() differ in the VFS; truncate()
doesn't set (ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME), and it's up to the
fs to do the timestamp updates if the size changes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
|
|
btrfs_cont_expand() tries to free an IS_ERR em as it gets an error from
btrfs_get_extent() and breaks out of its loop.
An instance of -EEXIST was reported in the wild:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874407
I have no idea if that -EEXIST is surprising, or not. Regardless, this
error handling should be cleaned up to handle other reasonable errors
(ENOMEM, EIO; whatever).
This seemed to be the only buggy freeing of the relatively rare IS_ERR
em so I opted to fix the caller rather than teach free_extent_map() to
use IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
|
|
xfstests case 285 complains.
It it because btrfs did not try to find unwritten delalloc
bytes(only dirty pages, not yet writeback) behind prealloc
extents, it ends up finding nothing while we're with SEEK_DATA.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
Lock end is inclusive.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
We forgot to reset the path lock state to zero after we unlock the path block,
and this can lead to the ASSERT checker in tree unlock API.
Reported-by: Slava Barinov <rayslava@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
This'd avoid us empty looping.
Say we have only one disk and the metadata raid type will be defaultly DUP,
and we do not need to start from index=0(RAID10) and get over two empty
loops to index=2(DUP).
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
Running xfstests 83 in a loop would sometimes fail the fsck. This happens
because if we invalidate a page that already has an ordered extent setup for
it we will complete the ordered extent ourselves, assuming that the truncate
will clean everything up. The problem with this is there is plenty of time
for the truncate to fail after we've done this work. So to fix this we need
to add the orphan item first to make sure the cleanup gets done properly,
and then we can truncate the pagecache and all that stuff and be safe. This
fixes the btrfsck failures I was seeing while running 83 in a loop. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
|
We still need to say we're flushing if we're limit flushing to keep somebody
from coming in and stealing our reservation. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
|
