| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
dell-laptop may not need to export any sysfs files, but it should still
create a platform device as a parent for the rfkill and backlight
devices. Otherwise sysfs will display these as "virtual" devices,
with no connection to either physical hardware or the dell-laptop
module.
Apparently this is useful for hardware detection.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
rfkill_unregister() should always be followed by rfkill_destroy().
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
dell_setup_rfkill() already cleans up the rfkill devices on failure.
So if it returns an error, we should not try to unregister the rfkill
devices.
Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
The current code in dell-laptop is confused about the hardware rfkill
state. Fix it up such that it's always reported correctly.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
A polarity error snuck into the rfkill rewrite's dell-laptop
conversion, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Tested-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
|
This patch completely rewrites the rfkill core to address
the following deficiencies:
* all rfkill drivers need to implement polling where necessary
rather than having one central implementation
* updating the rfkill state cannot be done from arbitrary
contexts, forcing drivers to use schedule_work and requiring
lots of code
* rfkill drivers need to keep track of soft/hard blocked
internally -- the core should do this
* the rfkill API has many unexpected quirks, for example being
asymmetric wrt. alloc/free and register/unregister
* rfkill can call back into a driver from within a function the
driver called -- this is prone to deadlocks and generally
should be avoided
* rfkill-input pointlessly is a separate module
* drivers need to #ifdef rfkill functions (unless they want to
depend on or select RFKILL) -- rfkill should provide inlines
that do nothing if it isn't compiled in
* the rfkill structure is not opaque -- drivers need to initialise
it correctly (lots of sanity checking code required) -- instead
force drivers to pass the right variables to rfkill_alloc()
* the documentation is hard to read because it always assumes the
reader is completely clueless and contains way TOO MANY CAPS
* the rfkill code needlessly uses a lot of locks and atomic
operations in locked sections
* fix LED trigger to actually change the LED when the radio state
changes -- this wasn't done before
Tested-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> [thinkpad]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
|
|
At the moment, dmi_walk() lacks flexibility, users can't pass data to
the callback function. Add a pointer for private data to make this
function more flexible.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
