Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Move x86 platform specific drivers from drivers/misc/
to a new home under drivers/platform/x86/.
The community has been maintaining x86 vendor-specific
platform specific drivers under /drivers/misc/ for a few years.
The oldest ones started life under drivers/acpi.
They moved out of drivers/acpi/ because they don't actually
implement the ACPI specification, but either simply
use ACPI, or implement vendor-specific ACPI extensions.
In the future we anticipate...
drivers/misc/ will go away.
other architectures will create drivers/platform/<arch>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
max_state is unsigned long.
don't set max_state a negative value
Cc : Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Cc : Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c:107: warning: format ‘%ld’ expects type ‘long int’, but argument 3 has type ‘long long unsigned int’
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Conflicts:
drivers/acpi/bay.c
drivers/acpi/dock.c
drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current
acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms.
Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support
64-bit integers on all platforms.
lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long"
lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update()
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Catch attempts to use of acpi_driver_data on pointers of wrong type.
akpm: rewritten to use proper C typechecking and remove the
"function"-used-as-lvalue thing.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
The function thermal_cooling_device_register always returns either a valid
pointer or a value made with ERR_PTR, so a test for non-zero on the result
will always succeed.
The problem was found using the following semantic match.
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//<smpl>
@a@
expression E, E1;
statement S,S1;
position p;
@@
E = thermal_cooling_device_register(...)
... when != E = E1
if@p (E) S else S1
@n@
position a.p;
expression E,E1;
statement S,S1;
@@
E = NULL
... when != E = E1
if@p (E) S else S1
@depends on !n@
expression E;
statement S,S1;
position a.p;
@@
* if@p (E)
S else S1
//</smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the
beginning of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an
obsolescent feature.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
|
|
Need to extract errors using PTR_ERR macro and
process accordingly.thermal_cooling_device_register
returning NULL means that CONFIG_THERMAL=n and in that
case no need to create symbolic links.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Intel menlow platform specific driver for thermal management extension.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <sujith.thomas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|