| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Conflicts:
drivers/acpi/motherboard.c
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Conflicts:
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
The PNP system board driver (drivers/pnp/system.c) contains all the
same functionality, so we don't need the ACPI version.
Previously, a motherboard device would be claimed by *both* the ACPI and
PNP drivers, resulting in stuff like this in /proc/ioports:
1200-121f : motherboard <-- from drivers/acpi/motherboard.c
1200-121f : pnp 00:0d <-- from drivers/pnp/system.c
Make sure to enable CONFIG_PNP (and CONFIG_PNPACPI) to include the
PNP system board driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Adjust link order to add ACPI devices to global list before PCI devices.
In addition, acpi_bus type must be initialized before any driver loads.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
This reverts 953969ddf5b049361ed1e8471cc43dc4134d2a6f commit.
|
|
This reverts commit a5e1b94008f2a96abf4a0c0371a55a56b320c13e.
Adrian Bunk points out that it has build errors, and apparently no
maintenance. Throw it out.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Most batteries today are ACPI "Control Method" batteries,
but some models ship with the older "Smart Battery"
that requires this code.
Rich Townsend and Bruno Ducrot were the original authors.
Vladimir Lebedev updated to run on latest kernel.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3734
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Create a driver which lives in the acpi subsystem to handle dock events.
This driver is not an "ACPI" driver, because acpi drivers require that the
object be present when the driver is loaded.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
(cherry picked from ef4611613657dfb8af8d336f2f61f08cfcdc9d8a commit)
|
|
Delete the ability to build an ACPI kernel that does
not include PCI support. When such a machine is created
and it requires a tuned kernel, send a patch.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1364
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
it is a synonym for CONFIG_ACPI
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
it is a synonym for CONFIG_ACPI
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
it has been a synonym for CONFIG_ACPI since 2.6.12
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Implement the framework for binding physical devices
with ACPI devices. A physical bus like PCI bus
should create a 'acpi_bus_type', with:
.find_device:
For device which has parent such as normal PCI devices.
.find_bridge:
It's for special devices, such as PCI root bridge
or IDE controller. Such devices generally haven't a
parent or ->bus. We use the special method
to get an ACPI handle.
Uses new field in struct device: firmware_data
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4277
Signed-off-by: David Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
See Documentation/acpi-hotkey.txt
Use cmdline "acpi_specific_hotkey" to enable
legacy platform specific drivers.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3887
Signed-off-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
