| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Commit be020f8618ca, "ARM: entry: abort-macro: specify registers to be
used for macros", while replacing register numbers with macro parameter
names, mismatched the name used for r1. For me, this resulted in user
space built for EABI with -march=armv4t -mtune=arm920t -mthumb-interwork
-mthumb broken on my OMAP1510 based Amstrad Delta (old ABI and no thumb
still worked for me though).
Fix this by using correct parameter name fsr instead of mismatched psr,
used by callers for another purpose.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Tail-call the main C data abort handler code from the per-CPU helper
code. Update the comments in the code wrt the new calling and return
register state.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
We can test bits 27:25 and 20 of the instruction at the same time;
there's no need to separate out the check of bit 20.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Require all callers of abort macros to specify the registers to be
used. This improves the documentation at the callsites as to which
registers are being used by this assembly code.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
