aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/mach-pxa/dma.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2008-11-29[ARM] Hide ISA DMA API when ISA_DMA_API is unsetRussell King
When ISA_DMA_API is unset, we're not implementing the ISA DMA API, so there's no point in publishing the prototypes via asm/dma.h, nor including the machine dependent parts of that API. This allows us to remove a lot of mach/dma.h files which don't contain any useful code. Unfortunately though, some platforms put their own private non-ISA definitions into mach/dma.h, so we leave these behind and fix the appropriate #include statments. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-08-07[ARM] Move include/asm-arm/arch-* to arch/arm/*/include/machRussell King
This just leaves include/asm-arm/plat-* to deal with. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-08-07[ARM] Remove asm/hardware.h, use asm/arch/hardware.h insteadRussell King
Remove includes of asm/hardware.h in addition to asm/arch/hardware.h. Then, since asm/hardware.h only exists to include asm/arch/hardware.h, update everything to directly include asm/arch/hardware.h and remove asm/hardware.h. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2008-03-06[ARM] replace remaining __FUNCTION__ occurrencesHarvey Harrison
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-07-12[ARM] 4451/1: pxa: make dma.c generic and remove cpu specific dma codeEric Miao
Since the number of dma channels varies between pxa25x and pxa27x, it introduces some specific code in dma.c. This patch moves the specific code to pxa25x.c and pxa27x.c and makes dma.c more generic. 1. add pxa_init_dma() for dma initialization, the number of channels are passed in by the argument 2. add a "prio" field to the "struct pxa_dma_channel" for the channel priority, and is initialized in pxa_init_dma() 3. use a general priority comparison with the channels "prio" field so to remove the processor specific pxa_for_each_dma_prio macro, this is not lightning fast as the original one, but it is acceptable as it happens when requesting dma, which is usually not so performance critical Signed-off-by: eric miao <eric.miao@marvell.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-10-06Initial blind fixup for arm for irq changesLinus Torvalds
Untested, but this should fix up the bulk of the totally mechanical issues, and should make the actual detail fixing easier. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-05-05[ARM] 3500/1: fix PXA27x DMA allocation priorityNicolas Pitre
Patch from Nicolas Pitre Intel PXA27x developers manual section 5.4.1.1 lists a priority distribution for the DMA channels differently than what the code currently assumes. This patch fixes that. Noticed by Simon Vogl <vogl@soft.uni-linz.ac.at> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-04-16Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!