| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
|
|
Patch from Lennert Buytenhek
This patch makes the kernel save Crunch state in userland signal frames,
so that any userland signal handler can safely use the Crunch coprocessor
without corrupting the Crunch state of the code it preempted.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
|
|
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz
In order for userspace to find saved coprocessor registers, move them from
struct rt_sigframe into struct ucontext. Also allow space for glibc's
sigset_t, so that userspace and kernelspace can use the same ucontext
layout. Define the magic numbers for iWMMXt in the header file for easier
reference. Include the size of the coprocessor data in the magic numbers.
Also define magic numbers and layout for VFP, not yet saved.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
GDB couldn't reliably tell the difference between the old and new
non-rt sigframes, so provide it with a number at the beginning which
will never appear in the old sigframe, and hence provide gdb with a
reliable way to tell the two apart.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
My bad.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Patch from Nicolas Pitre
The RESTARTBLOCK case currently store some code on the stack to invoke
sys_restart_syscall. However this is ABI dependent and there is a
mismatch with the way __NR_restart_syscall gets defined when the kernel
is compiled for EABI.
There is also a long standing bug in the thumb case since with OABI the
__NR_restart_syscall value includes __NR_SYSCALL_BASE which should not
be the case for Thumb syscalls.
Credits to Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@gmail.com> for finding the
EABI bug.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Gather the common sigmask savbing code inside setup_sigcontext(), and
rename the function setup_sigframe(). Pass it a sigframe structure.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Gather the sigmask restoration code inside restore_sigcontext(), and
rename the function restore_sigframe(). Pass it a sigframe structure.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
sigframe is now a contained subset of rt_sigframe, so we can start
to re-use code which accesses sigframe data for both rt and non-rt
signals.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
ucontext contains both the sigcontext and sigmask structures, and
is also used for rt signal contexts. Re-use this structure for
non-rt signals.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
There's not much point in splitting the sigmask between two different
locations, so copy it entirely into a proper sigset_t. This will
eventually allow rt_sigframe and sigframe to share more code.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
These two members appear to be surplus to requirements. Discussing
this issue with glibc folk:
| > Additionally, do you see any need for these weird "puc" and "pinfo"
| > pointers in the kernels rt_sigframe structure? Can we kill them?
|
| We can kill them. I checked with Phil B. about them last week, and he
| didn't remember any reason they still needed to be there. And nothing
| should know where they are on the stack. Unfortunately, doing this
| will upset GDB, which knows that the saved registers are 0x88 bytes
| above the stack pointer on entrance to an rt signal trampoline; but,
| since puc and pinfo are quite recognizable, I can adapt GDB to support
| the new layout if you want to remove them.
So remove them.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Patch from Nicolas Pitre
The signal return path consists of user code provided by the kernel.
Since a syscall is used, it has to be updated to work with EABI.
Noticed by Daniel Jacobowitz.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz
After delivering a signal (creating its stack frame) we must check for
additional pending unblocked signals before returning to userspace.
Otherwise signals may be delayed past the next syscall or reschedule.
Once that was fixed it became obvious that the ARM signal mask manipulation
was broken. It was a little bit broken before the recent SA_NODEFER
changes, and then very broken after them. We must block the requested
signals before starting the handler or the same signal can be delivered
again before the handler even gets a chance to run.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Prepare arm for the split page_table_lock: three issues.
Signal handling's preserve and restore of iwmmxt context currently involves
reading and writing that context to and from user space, while holding
page_table_lock to secure the user page(s) against kswapd. If we split the
lock, then the structure might span two pages, secured by to read into and
write from a kernel stack buffer, copying that out and in without locking (the
structure is 160 bytes in size, and here we're near the top of the kernel
stack). Or would the overhead be noticeable?
arm_syscall's cmpxchg emulation use pte_offset_map_lock, instead of
pte_offset_map and mm-wide page_table_lock; and strictly, it should now also
take mmap_sem before descending to pmd, to guard against another thread
munmapping, and the page table pulled out beneath this thread.
Updated two comments in fault-armv.c. adjust_pte is interesting, since its
modification of a pte in one part of the mm depends on the lock held when
calling update_mmu_cache for a pte in some other part of that mm. This can't
be done with a split page_table_lock (and we've already taken the lowest lock
in the hierarchy here): so we'll have to disable split on arm, unless
CONFIG_CPU_CACHE_VIPT to ensures adjust_pte never used.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
It has been reported that the way Linux handles NODEFER for signals is
not consistent with the way other Unix boxes handle it. I've written a
program to test the behavior of how this flag affects signals and had
several reports from people who ran this on various Unix boxes,
confirming that Linux seems to be unique on the way this is handled.
The way NODEFER affects signals on other Unix boxes is as follows:
1) If NODEFER is set, other signals in sa_mask are still blocked.
2) If NODEFER is set and the signal is in sa_mask, then the signal is
still blocked. (Note: this is the behavior of all tested but Linux _and_
NetBSD 2.0 *).
The way NODEFER affects signals on Linux:
1) If NODEFER is set, other signals are _not_ blocked regardless of
sa_mask (Even NetBSD doesn't do this).
2) If NODEFER is set and the signal is in sa_mask, then the signal being
handled is not blocked.
The patch converts signal handling in all current Linux architectures to
the way most Unix boxes work.
Unix boxes that were tested: DU4, AIX 5.2, Irix 6.5, NetBSD 2.0, SFU
3.5 on WinXP, AIX 5.3, Mac OSX, and of course Linux 2.6.13-rcX.
* NetBSD was the only other Unix to behave like Linux on point #2. The
main concern was brought up by point #1 which even NetBSD isn't like
Linux. So with this patch, we leave NetBSD as the lonely one that
behaves differently here with #2.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Another swsusp fixup.
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Move the signal return code into the vector page instead of placing
it on the user mode stack, which will allow us to avoid flushing
the instruction cache on signals, as well as eventually allowing
non-exec stack.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
