aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-03-20ARM: 7663/1: perf: fix ARMv7 EVTYPE_MASK to include NSH bitWill Deacon
commit f2fe09b055e2549de41fb107b34c60bac4a1b0cf upstream. Masked out PMXEVTYPER.NSH means that we can't enable profiling at PL2, regardless of the settings in the HDCR. This patch fixes the broken mask. Reported-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
2012-03-12ARM: 7356/1: perf: check that we have an event in the PMU IRQ handlersWill Deacon
commit f6f5a30c834135c9f2fa10400c59ebbdd9188567 upstream. The PMU IRQ handlers in perf assume that if a counter has overflowed then perf must be responsible. In the paranoid world of crazy hardware, this could be false, so check that we do have a valid event before attempting to dereference NULL in the interrupt path. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-03-12ARM: 7355/1: perf: clear overflow flag when disabling counter on ARMv7 PMUWill Deacon
commit 99c1745b9c76910e195889044f914b4898b7c9a5 upstream. When disabling a counter on an ARMv7 PMU, we should also clear the overflow flag in case an overflow occurred whilst stopping the counter. This prevents a spurious overflow being picked up later and leading to either false accounting or a NULL dereference. Reported-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-03-12ARM: 7354/1: perf: limit sample_period to half max_period in non-sampling modeWill Deacon
commit 5727347180ebc6b4a866fcbe00dcb39cc03acb37 upstream. On ARM, the PMU does not stop counting after an overflow and therefore IRQ latency affects the new counter value read by the kernel. This is significant for non-sampling runs where it is possible for the new value to overtake the previous one, causing the delta to be out by up to max_period events. Commit a737823d ("ARM: 6835/1: perf: ensure overflows aren't missed due to IRQ latency") attempted to fix this problem by allowing interrupt handlers to pass an overflow flag to the event update function, causing the overflow calculation to assume that the counter passed through zero when going from prev to new. Unfortunately, this doesn't work when overflow occurs on the perf_task_tick path because we have the flag cleared and end up computing a large negative delta. This patch removes the overflow flag from armpmu_event_update and instead limits the sample_period to half of the max_period for non-sampling profiling runs. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2011-10-28Merge branch 'devel-stable' of ↵Linus Torvalds
http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm * 'devel-stable' of http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm: (178 commits) ARM: 7139/1: fix compilation with CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT and large TEXT_OFFSET ARM: gic, local timers: use the request_percpu_irq() interface ARM: gic: consolidate PPI handling ARM: switch from NO_MACH_MEMORY_H to NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H ARM: mach-s5p64x0: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-s3c64xx: remove mach/memory.h ARM: plat-mxc: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-prima2: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-zynq: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-bcmring: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-davinci: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-pxa: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-ixp4xx: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-h720x: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-vt8500: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-s5pc100: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-tegra: remove mach/memory.h ARM: plat-tcc: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-mmp: remove mach/memory.h ARM: mach-cns3xxx: remove mach/memory.h ... Fix up mostly pretty trivial conflicts in: - arch/arm/Kconfig - arch/arm/include/asm/localtimer.h - arch/arm/kernel/Makefile - arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ap4evb.c - arch/arm/mach-u300/core.c - arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c - arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S - arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig largely due to some CONFIG option renaming (ie CONFIG_PM_SLEEP -> CONFIG_ARM_CPU_SUSPEND for the arm-specific suspend code etc) and addition of NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H next to HAVE_IDE.
2011-10-15ARM: 7117/1: perf: fix HW_CACHE_* events on Cortex-A9Will Deacon
Using COHERENT_LINE_{MISS,HIT} for cache misses and references respectively is completely wrong. Instead, use the L1D events which are a better and more useful approximation despite ignoring instruction traffic. Reported-by: Alasdair Grant <alasdair.grant@arm.com> Reported-by: Matt Horsnell <matt.horsnell@arm.com> Reported-by: Michael Williams <michael.williams@arm.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Cc: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: remove cpu-related misnomersMark Rutland
Currently struct cpu_hw_events stores data on events running on a PMU associated with a CPU. As this data is general enough to be used for system PMUs, this name is a misnomer, and may cause confusion when it is used for system PMUs. Additionally, 'armpmu' is commonly used as a parameter name for an instance of struct arm_pmu. The name is also used for a global instance which represents the CPU's PMU. As cpu_hw_events is now not tied to CPU PMUs, it is renamed to pmu_hw_events, with instances of it renamed similarly. As the global 'armpmu' is CPU-specfic, it is renamed to cpu_pmu. This should make it clearer which code is generic, and which is coupled with the CPU. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: refactor event mappingMark Rutland
Currently mapping an event type to a hardware configuration value depends on the data being pointed to from struct arm_pmu. These fields (cache_map, event_map, raw_event_mask) are currently specific to CPU PMUs, and do not serve the general case well. This patch replaces the event map pointers on struct arm_pmu with a new 'map_event' function pointer. Small shim functions are used to reuse the existing common code. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: lock PMU registers per-CPUMark Rutland
Currently, a single lock serialises access to CPU PMU registers. This global locking is unnecessary as PMU registers are local to the CPU they monitor. This patch replaces the global lock with a per-CPU lock. As the lock is in struct cpu_hw_events, PMUs providing a single cpu_hw_events instance can be locked globally. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: remove active_maskMark Rutland
Currently, pmu_hw_events::active_mask is used to keep track of which events are active in hardware. As we can stop counters and their interrupts, this is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: add mode exclusion for Cortex-A15 PMUWill Deacon
The Cortex-A15 PMU implements the PMUv2 specification and therefore has support for some mode exclusion. This patch adds support for excluding user, kernel and hypervisor counts from a given event. Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: index ARMv7 event counters starting from zeroWill Deacon
The current ARMv7 PMU backend indexes event counters from two, with index zero being reserved and index one being used to represent the cycle counter. This patch tidies up the code by indexing from one instead (with zero for the cycle counter). This allows us to remove many of the accessor macros along with the counter enumeration and makes the code much more readable. Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: use integers for ARMv7 event indicesWill Deacon
This patch ensures that integers are used to represent event indices in the ARMv7 PMU backend. This ensures consistency between functions and also with the arm_pmu structure. Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: use u32 instead of unsigned long for PMNC registerWill Deacon
The ARMv7 perf backend mixes up u32 and unsigned long, which is rather ugly. This patch makes the ARMv7 PMU code consistently use the u32 type instead. Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-08-31ARM: perf: de-const struct arm_pmuMark Rutland
This patch removes const qualifiers from instances of struct arm_pmu, and functions initialising them, in preparation for generalising arm_pmu usage to system (AKA uncore) PMUs. This will allow for dynamically modifiable structures (locks, struct pmu) to be added as members of struct arm_pmu. Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-07-24Merge branch 'for-linus' of master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-armLinus Torvalds
* 'for-linus' of master.kernel.org:/home/rmk/linux-2.6-arm: (237 commits) ARM: 7004/1: fix traps.h compile warnings ARM: 6998/2: kernel: use proper memory barriers for bitops ARM: 6997/1: ep93xx: increase NR_BANKS to 16 for support of 128MB RAM ARM: Fix build errors caused by adding generic macros ARM: CPU hotplug: ensure we migrate all IRQs off a downed CPU ARM: CPU hotplug: pass in proper affinity mask on IRQ migration ARM: GIC: avoid routing interrupts to offline CPUs ARM: CPU hotplug: fix abuse of irqdesc->node ARM: 6981/2: mmci: adjust calculation of f_min ARM: 7000/1: LPAE: Use long long printk format for displaying the pud ARM: 6999/1: head, zImage: Always Enter the kernel in ARM state ARM: btc: avoid invalidating the branch target cache on kernel TLB maintanence ARM: ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE is no more ARM: mach-shark: move ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size ARM: mach-sa1100: move ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size ARM: mach-realview: move from ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size ARM: mach-pxa: move from ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size ARM: mach-ixp4xx: move from ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size ARM: mach-h720x: move from ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size ARM: mach-davinci: move from ARM_DMA_ZONE_SIZE to mdesc->dma_zone_size ...
2011-07-07ARM: perf: add support for the Cortex-A15 PMUWill Deacon
This patch adds support for the Cortex-A15 PMU to the ARMv7 perf-event backend. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-07-07ARM: perf: add support for the Cortex-A5 PMUWill Deacon
This patch adds support for the Cortex-A5 PMU to the ARMv7 perf-event backend. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-07-07ARM: perf: add PMUv2 common event definitionsWill Deacon
The PMUv2 specification reserves a number of event encodings for common events. This patch adds these events to the common event enumeration in preparation for PMUv2 cores, such as Cortex-A15. Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-07-07ARM: perf: remove confusing comment from v7 perf events backendWill Deacon
The comment about measuring TLB misses and refills in the ARMv7 perf backend makes little sense and refers loosely to raw counters that should be used instead. This patch removes the comments to avoid any confusion. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2011-07-01perf, arch: Add generic NODE cache eventsPeter Zijlstra
Add a NODE level to the generic cache events which is used to measure local vs remote memory accesses. Like all other cache events, an ACCESS is HIT+MISS, if there is no way to distinguish between reads and writes do reads only etc.. The below needs filling out for !x86 (which I filled out with unsupported events). I'm fairly sure ARM can leave it like that since it doesn't strike me as an architecture that even has NUMA support. SH might have something since it does appear to have some NUMA bits. Sparc64, PowerPC and MIPS certainly want a good look there since they clearly are NUMA capable. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303508226.4865.8.camel@laptop Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-07-01perf: Remove the nmi parameter from the swevent and overflow interfacePeter Zijlstra
The nmi parameter indicated if we could do wakeups from the current context, if not, we would set some state and self-IPI and let the resulting interrupt do the wakeup. For the various event classes: - hardware: nmi=0; PMI is in fact an NMI or we run irq_work_run from the PMI-tail (ARM etc.) - tracepoint: nmi=0; since tracepoint could be from NMI context. - software: nmi=[0,1]; some, like the schedule thing cannot perform wakeups, and hence need 0. As one can see, there is very little nmi=1 usage, and the down-side of not using it is that on some platforms some software events can have a jiffy delay in wakeup (when arch_irq_work_raise isn't implemented). The up-side however is that we can remove the nmi parameter and save a bunch of conditionals in fast paths. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-agjev8eu666tvknpb3iaj0fg@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-03-26ARM: 6835/1: perf: ensure overflows aren't missed due to IRQ latencyWill Deacon
If a counter overflows during a perf stat profiling run it may overtake the last known value of the counter: 0 prev new 0xffffffff |----------|-------|----------------------| In this case, the number of events that have occurred is (0xffffffff - prev) + new. Unfortunately, the event update code will not realise an overflow has occurred and will instead report the event delta as (new - prev) which may be considerably smaller than the real count. This patch adds an extra argument to armpmu_event_update which indicates whether or not an overflow has occurred. If an overflow has occurred then we use the maximum period of the counter to calculate the elapsed events. Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reported-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-03-26ARM: 6834/1: perf: reset counters on all CPUs during initialisationWill Deacon
ARMv7 dictates that the interrupt-enable and count-enable registers for each PMU counter are UNKNOWN following core reset. This patch adds a new (optional) function pointer to struct arm_pmu for resetting the PMU state during init. The reset function is called on each CPU via an arch_initcall in the generic ARM perf_event code and allows the PMU backend to write sane values to any UNKNOWN registers. Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2011-03-26ARM: 6833/1: perf: add required isbs() to ARMv7 backendWill Deacon
The ARMv7 architecture does not guarantee that effects from co-processor writes are immediately visible to following instructions. This patch adds two isbs to the ARMv7 perf code: (1) Immediately after selecting an event register, so that the PMU state following this instruction is consistent with the new event. (2) Immediately before writing to the PMCR, so that any previous writes to the PMU have taken effect before (typically) enabling the counters. Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-04ARM: 6521/1: perf: use raw_spinlock_t for pmu_lockWill Deacon
For kernels built with PREEMPT_RT, critical sections protected by standard spinlocks are preemptible. This is not acceptable on perf as (a) we may be scheduled onto a different CPU whilst reading/writing banked PMU registers and (b) the latency when reading the PMU registers becomes unpredictable. This patch upgrades the pmu_lock spinlock to a raw_spinlock instead. Reported-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-12-04ARM: 6512/1: perf: fix warnings generated by sparseWill Deacon
Russell reported a number of warnings coming from sparse when checking the ARM perf_event.c files: | perf_event.c seems to also have problems too: | | CHECK arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:37:1: warning: symbol 'pmu_lock' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:70:1: warning: symbol 'cpu_hw_events' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1006:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1113:1: warning: symbol 'armv6pmu_stop' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:1956:6: warning: symbol 'armv7pmu_enable_event' was not declared. Should it be static? | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: expected void const volatile [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident> | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3072:14: got struct frame_tail *tail | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: expected void const [noderef] <asn:1>*from | arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c:3074:49: got struct frame_tail *tail This patch resolves these issues so we can live in silence again. Reported-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-11-25ARM: perf: separate PMU backends into multiple filesWill Deacon
The ARM perf_event.c file contains all PMU backends and, as new PMUs are introduced, will continue to grow. This patch follows the example of x86 and splits the PMU implementations into separate files which are then #included back into the main file. Compile-time guards are added to each PMU file to avoid compiling in code that is not relevant for the version of the architecture which we are targetting. Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>