diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/futex.c | 52 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 32 |
2 files changed, 67 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 5f589279e46..81dbe773ce4 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -745,7 +745,8 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr) static int lookup_pi_state(u32 uval, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, - union futex_key *key, struct futex_pi_state **ps) + union futex_key *key, struct futex_pi_state **ps, + struct task_struct *task) { struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL; struct futex_q *this, *next; @@ -786,6 +787,16 @@ lookup_pi_state(u32 uval, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, return -EINVAL; } + /* + * Protect against a corrupted uval. If uval + * is 0x80000000 then pid is 0 and the waiter + * bit is set. So the deadlock check in the + * calling code has failed and we did not fall + * into the check above due to !pid. + */ + if (task && pi_state->owner == task) + return -EDEADLK; + atomic_inc(&pi_state->refcount); *ps = pi_state; @@ -803,6 +814,11 @@ lookup_pi_state(u32 uval, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb, if (!p) return -ESRCH; + if (!p->mm) { + put_task_struct(p); + return -EPERM; + } + /* * We need to look at the task state flags to figure out, * whether the task is exiting. To protect against the do_exit @@ -935,7 +951,7 @@ retry: * We dont have the lock. Look up the PI state (or create it if * we are the first waiter): */ - ret = lookup_pi_state(uval, hb, key, ps); + ret = lookup_pi_state(uval, hb, key, ps, task); if (unlikely(ret)) { switch (ret) { @@ -1347,7 +1363,7 @@ void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key, * * Return: * 0 - failed to acquire the lock atomically; - * 1 - acquired the lock; + * >0 - acquired the lock, return value is vpid of the top_waiter * <0 - error */ static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, @@ -1358,7 +1374,7 @@ static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, { struct futex_q *top_waiter = NULL; u32 curval; - int ret; + int ret, vpid; if (get_futex_value_locked(&curval, pifutex)) return -EFAULT; @@ -1386,11 +1402,13 @@ static int futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, * the contended case or if set_waiters is 1. The pi_state is returned * in ps in contended cases. */ + vpid = task_pid_vnr(top_waiter->task); ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(pifutex, hb2, key2, ps, top_waiter->task, set_waiters); - if (ret == 1) + if (ret == 1) { requeue_pi_wake_futex(top_waiter, key2, hb2); - + return vpid; + } return ret; } @@ -1421,7 +1439,6 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, *hb2; struct futex_q *this, *next; - u32 curval2; if (requeue_pi) { /* @@ -1509,16 +1526,25 @@ retry_private: * At this point the top_waiter has either taken uaddr2 or is * waiting on it. If the former, then the pi_state will not * exist yet, look it up one more time to ensure we have a - * reference to it. + * reference to it. If the lock was taken, ret contains the + * vpid of the top waiter task. */ - if (ret == 1) { + if (ret > 0) { WARN_ON(pi_state); drop_count++; task_count++; - ret = get_futex_value_locked(&curval2, uaddr2); - if (!ret) - ret = lookup_pi_state(curval2, hb2, &key2, - &pi_state); + /* + * If we acquired the lock, then the user + * space value of uaddr2 should be vpid. It + * cannot be changed by the top waiter as it + * is blocked on hb2 lock if it tries to do + * so. If something fiddled with it behind our + * back the pi state lookup might unearth + * it. So we rather use the known value than + * rereading and handing potential crap to + * lookup_pi_state. + */ + ret = lookup_pi_state(ret, hb2, &key2, &pi_state, NULL); } switch (ret) { diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index aa4dff04b59..a620d4d08ca 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -343,9 +343,16 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting * mode! */ - if (top_waiter && (!task_has_pi_waiters(task) || - top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task))) - goto out_unlock_pi; + if (top_waiter) { + if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task)) + goto out_unlock_pi; + /* + * If deadlock detection is off, we stop here if we + * are not the top pi waiter of the task. + */ + if (!detect_deadlock && top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)) + goto out_unlock_pi; + } /* * When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further @@ -361,7 +368,12 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, goto retry; } - /* Deadlock detection */ + /* + * Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original + * lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the + * current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain + * walk, we detected a deadlock. + */ if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) { debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock); raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); @@ -527,6 +539,18 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned long flags; int chain_walk = 0, res; + /* + * Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to + * enqueue on itself just to untangle the mess later. It's not + * only an optimization. We drop the locks, so another waiter + * can come in before the chain walk detects the deadlock. So + * the other will detect the deadlock and return -EDEADLOCK, + * which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock + * situation. + */ + if (detect_deadlock && owner == task) + return -EDEADLK; + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); waiter->task = task; |