1 files changed, 146 insertions, 134 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
index 66fa43dc3f0..d77b67c4b27 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
@@ -24,185 +24,197 @@
 #include "extent_io.h"
 #include "locking.h"
 
-static inline void spin_nested(struct extent_buffer *eb)
-{
-	spin_lock(&eb->lock);
-}
+void btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb);
 
 /*
- * Setting a lock to blocking will drop the spinlock and set the
- * flag that forces other procs who want the lock to wait.  After
- * this you can safely schedule with the lock held.
+ * if we currently have a spinning reader or writer lock
+ * (indicated by the rw flag) this will bump the count
+ * of blocking holders and drop the spinlock.
  */
-void btrfs_set_lock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw)
 {
-	if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags)) {
-		set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags);
-		spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
+	if (rw == BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK) {
+		if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0) {
+			WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1);
+			atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers);
+			btrfs_assert_tree_locked(eb);
+			atomic_inc(&eb->blocking_writers);
+			write_unlock(&eb->lock);
+		}
+	} else if (rw == BTRFS_READ_LOCK) {
+		btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(eb);
+		atomic_inc(&eb->blocking_readers);
+		WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_readers) == 0);
+		atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_readers);
+		read_unlock(&eb->lock);
 	}
-	/* exit with the spin lock released and the bit set */
+	return;
 }
 
 /*
- * clearing the blocking flag will take the spinlock again.
- * After this you can't safely schedule
+ * if we currently have a blocking lock, take the spinlock
+ * and drop our blocking count
  */
-void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw)
 {
-	if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags)) {
-		spin_nested(eb);
-		clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags);
-		smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
+	if (rw == BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK_BLOCKING) {
+		BUG_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) != 1);
+		write_lock(&eb->lock);
+		WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
+		atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers);
+		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_writers))
+			wake_up(&eb->write_lock_wq);
+	} else if (rw == BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING) {
+		BUG_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0);
+		read_lock(&eb->lock);
+		atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers);
+		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers))
+			wake_up(&eb->read_lock_wq);
 	}
-	/* exit with the spin lock held */
+	return;
 }
 
 /*
- * unfortunately, many of the places that currently set a lock to blocking
- * don't end up blocking for very long, and often they don't block
- * at all.  For a dbench 50 run, if we don't spin on the blocking bit
- * at all, the context switch rate can jump up to 400,000/sec or more.
- *
- * So, we're still stuck with this crummy spin on the blocking bit,
- * at least until the most common causes of the short blocks
- * can be dealt with.
+ * take a spinning read lock.  This will wait for any blocking
+ * writers
  */
-static int btrfs_spin_on_block(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < 512; i++) {
-		if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
-			return 1;
-		if (need_resched())
-			break;
-		cpu_relax();
+again:
+	wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0);
+	read_lock(&eb->lock);
+	if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) {
+		read_unlock(&eb->lock);
+		wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq,
+			   atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0);
+		goto again;
 	}
-	return 0;
+	atomic_inc(&eb->read_locks);
+	atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers);
 }
 
 /*
- * This is somewhat different from trylock.  It will take the
- * spinlock but if it finds the lock is set to blocking, it will
- * return without the lock held.
- *
- * returns 1 if it was able to take the lock and zero otherwise
- *
- * After this call, scheduling is not safe without first calling
- * btrfs_set_lock_blocking()
+ * returns 1 if we get the read lock and 0 if we don't
+ * this won't wait for blocking writers
  */
-int btrfs_try_spin_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+int btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	int i;
+	if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers))
+		return 0;
 
-	if (btrfs_spin_on_block(eb)) {
-		spin_nested(eb);
-		if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
-			return 1;
-		spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
+	read_lock(&eb->lock);
+	if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) {
+		read_unlock(&eb->lock);
+		return 0;
 	}
-	/* spin for a bit on the BLOCKING flag */
-	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
-		cpu_relax();
-		if (!btrfs_spin_on_block(eb))
-			break;
-
-		spin_nested(eb);
-		if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
-			return 1;
-		spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
-	}
-	return 0;
+	atomic_inc(&eb->read_locks);
+	atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers);
+	return 1;
 }
 
 /*
- * the autoremove wake function will return 0 if it tried to wake up
- * a process that was already awake, which means that process won't
- * count as an exclusive wakeup.  The waitq code will continue waking
- * procs until it finds one that was actually sleeping.
- *
- * For btrfs, this isn't quite what we want.  We want a single proc
- * to be notified that the lock is ready for taking.  If that proc
- * already happen to be awake, great, it will loop around and try for
- * the lock.
- *
- * So, btrfs_wake_function always returns 1, even when the proc that we
- * tried to wake up was already awake.
+ * returns 1 if we get the read lock and 0 if we don't
+ * this won't wait for blocking writers or readers
  */
-static int btrfs_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode,
-			       int sync, void *key)
+int btrfs_try_tree_write_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, key);
+	if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) ||
+	    atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers))
+		return 0;
+	write_lock(&eb->lock);
+	if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) ||
+	    atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) {
+		write_unlock(&eb->lock);
+		return 0;
+	}
+	atomic_inc(&eb->write_locks);
+	atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers);
 	return 1;
 }
 
 /*
- * returns with the extent buffer spinlocked.
- *
- * This will spin and/or wait as required to take the lock, and then
- * return with the spinlock held.
- *
- * After this call, scheduling is not safe without first calling
- * btrfs_set_lock_blocking()
+ * drop a spinning read lock
+ */
+void btrfs_tree_read_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+{
+	btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(eb);
+	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_readers) == 0);
+	atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_readers);
+	atomic_dec(&eb->read_locks);
+	read_unlock(&eb->lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * drop a blocking read lock
+ */
+void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+{
+	btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(eb);
+	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers))
+		wake_up(&eb->read_lock_wq);
+	atomic_dec(&eb->read_locks);
+}
+
+/*
+ * take a spinning write lock.  This will wait for both
+ * blocking readers or writers
  */
 int btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-	wait.func = btrfs_wake_function;
-
-	if (!btrfs_spin_on_block(eb))
-		goto sleep;
-
-	while(1) {
-		spin_nested(eb);
-
-		/* nobody is blocking, exit with the spinlock held */
-		if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
-			return 0;
-
-		/*
-		 * we have the spinlock, but the real owner is blocking.
-		 * wait for them
-		 */
-		spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
-
-		/*
-		 * spin for a bit, and if the blocking flag goes away,
-		 * loop around
-		 */
-		cpu_relax();
-		if (btrfs_spin_on_block(eb))
-			continue;
-sleep:
-		prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&eb->lock_wq, &wait,
-					  TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-
-		if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
-			schedule();
-
-		finish_wait(&eb->lock_wq, &wait);
+again:
+	wait_event(eb->read_lock_wq, atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0);
+	wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq, atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0);
+	write_lock(&eb->lock);
+	if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers)) {
+		write_unlock(&eb->lock);
+		wait_event(eb->read_lock_wq,
+			   atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0);
+		goto again;
 	}
+	if (atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers)) {
+		write_unlock(&eb->lock);
+		wait_event(eb->write_lock_wq,
+			   atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers) == 0);
+		goto again;
+	}
+	WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
+	atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers);
+	atomic_inc(&eb->write_locks);
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * drop a spinning or a blocking write lock.
+ */
 int btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	/*
-	 * if we were a blocking owner, we don't have the spinlock held
-	 * just clear the bit and look for waiters
-	 */
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
-		smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
-	else
-		spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
-
-	if (waitqueue_active(&eb->lock_wq))
-		wake_up(&eb->lock_wq);
+	int blockers = atomic_read(&eb->blocking_writers);
+
+	BUG_ON(blockers > 1);
+
+	btrfs_assert_tree_locked(eb);
+	atomic_dec(&eb->write_locks);
+
+	if (blockers) {
+		WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers));
+		atomic_dec(&eb->blocking_writers);
+		smp_wmb();
+		wake_up(&eb->write_lock_wq);
+	} else {
+		WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1);
+		atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers);
+		write_unlock(&eb->lock);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
 void btrfs_assert_tree_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb)
 {
-	if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
-		assert_spin_locked(&eb->lock);
+	BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&eb->write_locks));
+}
+
+void btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+{
+	BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&eb->read_locks));
 }