diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/fuse/inode.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/backing-dev.h | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/page-writeback.c | 263 |
3 files changed, 206 insertions, 62 deletions
diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c index e0fe703ee3d..84434594e80 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static int fuse_bdi_init(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct super_block *sb) fc->bdi.name = "fuse"; fc->bdi.ra_pages = (VM_MAX_READAHEAD * 1024) / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; /* fuse does it's own writeback accounting */ - fc->bdi.capabilities = BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_WB; + fc->bdi.capabilities = BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_WB | BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT; err = bdi_init(&fc->bdi); if (err) diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h index c3881553f7d..5f66d519a72 100644 --- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h +++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h @@ -243,6 +243,8 @@ int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int max_ratio); * BDI_CAP_EXEC_MAP: Can be mapped for execution * * BDI_CAP_SWAP_BACKED: Count shmem/tmpfs objects as swap-backed. + * + * BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT: Keep number of dirty pages below bdi threshold. */ #define BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_DIRTY 0x00000001 #define BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK 0x00000002 @@ -254,6 +256,7 @@ int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int max_ratio); #define BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_WB 0x00000080 #define BDI_CAP_SWAP_BACKED 0x00000100 #define BDI_CAP_STABLE_WRITES 0x00000200 +#define BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT 0x00000400 #define BDI_CAP_VMFLAGS \ (BDI_CAP_READ_MAP | BDI_CAP_WRITE_MAP | BDI_CAP_EXEC_MAP) diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index 3750431b3cd..6c7b0187be8 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -585,6 +585,37 @@ unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned long dirty) } /* + * setpoint - dirty 3 + * f(dirty) := 1.0 + (----------------) + * limit - setpoint + * + * it's a 3rd order polynomial that subjects to + * + * (1) f(freerun) = 2.0 => rampup dirty_ratelimit reasonably fast + * (2) f(setpoint) = 1.0 => the balance point + * (3) f(limit) = 0 => the hard limit + * (4) df/dx <= 0 => negative feedback control + * (5) the closer to setpoint, the smaller |df/dx| (and the reverse) + * => fast response on large errors; small oscillation near setpoint + */ +static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint, + unsigned long dirty, + unsigned long limit) +{ + long long pos_ratio; + long x; + + x = div_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT, + limit - setpoint + 1); + pos_ratio = x; + pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; + pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; + pos_ratio += 1 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; + + return clamp(pos_ratio, 0LL, 2LL << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT); +} + +/* * Dirty position control. * * (o) global/bdi setpoints @@ -682,26 +713,80 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, /* * global setpoint * - * setpoint - dirty 3 - * f(dirty) := 1.0 + (----------------) - * limit - setpoint + * See comment for pos_ratio_polynom(). + */ + setpoint = (freerun + limit) / 2; + pos_ratio = pos_ratio_polynom(setpoint, dirty, limit); + + /* + * The strictlimit feature is a tool preventing mistrusted filesystems + * from growing a large number of dirty pages before throttling. For + * such filesystems balance_dirty_pages always checks bdi counters + * against bdi limits. Even if global "nr_dirty" is under "freerun". + * This is especially important for fuse which sets bdi->max_ratio to + * 1% by default. Without strictlimit feature, fuse writeback may + * consume arbitrary amount of RAM because it is accounted in + * NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP which is not involved in calculating "nr_dirty". * - * it's a 3rd order polynomial that subjects to + * Here, in bdi_position_ratio(), we calculate pos_ratio based on + * two values: bdi_dirty and bdi_thresh. Let's consider an example: + * total amount of RAM is 16GB, bdi->max_ratio is equal to 1%, global + * limits are set by default to 10% and 20% (background and throttle). + * Then bdi_thresh is 1% of 20% of 16GB. This amounts to ~8K pages. + * bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, bg_thresh) is about ~4K pages. bdi_setpoint is + * about ~6K pages (as the average of background and throttle bdi + * limits). The 3rd order polynomial will provide positive feedback if + * bdi_dirty is under bdi_setpoint and vice versa. * - * (1) f(freerun) = 2.0 => rampup dirty_ratelimit reasonably fast - * (2) f(setpoint) = 1.0 => the balance point - * (3) f(limit) = 0 => the hard limit - * (4) df/dx <= 0 => negative feedback control - * (5) the closer to setpoint, the smaller |df/dx| (and the reverse) - * => fast response on large errors; small oscillation near setpoint + * Note, that we cannot use global counters in these calculations + * because we want to throttle process writing to a strictlimit BDI + * much earlier than global "freerun" is reached (~23MB vs. ~2.3GB + * in the example above). */ - setpoint = (freerun + limit) / 2; - x = div_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT, - limit - setpoint + 1); - pos_ratio = x; - pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; - pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; - pos_ratio += 1 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; + if (unlikely(bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) { + long long bdi_pos_ratio; + unsigned long bdi_bg_thresh; + + if (bdi_dirty < 8) + return min_t(long long, pos_ratio * 2, + 2 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT); + + if (bdi_dirty >= bdi_thresh) + return 0; + + bdi_bg_thresh = div_u64((u64)bdi_thresh * bg_thresh, thresh); + bdi_setpoint = dirty_freerun_ceiling(bdi_thresh, + bdi_bg_thresh); + + if (bdi_setpoint == 0 || bdi_setpoint == bdi_thresh) + return 0; + + bdi_pos_ratio = pos_ratio_polynom(bdi_setpoint, bdi_dirty, + bdi_thresh); + + /* + * Typically, for strictlimit case, bdi_setpoint << setpoint + * and pos_ratio >> bdi_pos_ratio. In the other words global + * state ("dirty") is not limiting factor and we have to + * make decision based on bdi counters. But there is an + * important case when global pos_ratio should get precedence: + * global limits are exceeded (e.g. due to activities on other + * BDIs) while given strictlimit BDI is below limit. + * + * "pos_ratio * bdi_pos_ratio" would work for the case above, + * but it would look too non-natural for the case of all + * activity in the system coming from a single strictlimit BDI + * with bdi->max_ratio == 100%. + * + * Note that min() below somewhat changes the dynamics of the + * control system. Normally, pos_ratio value can be well over 3 + * (when globally we are at freerun and bdi is well below bdi + * setpoint). Now the maximum pos_ratio in the same situation + * is 2. We might want to tweak this if we observe the control + * system is too slow to adapt. + */ + return min(pos_ratio, bdi_pos_ratio); + } /* * We have computed basic pos_ratio above based on global situation. If @@ -994,6 +1079,27 @@ static void bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, * keep that period small to reduce time lags). */ step = 0; + + /* + * For strictlimit case, calculations above were based on bdi counters + * and limits (starting from pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio() and up to + * balanced_dirty_ratelimit = task_ratelimit * write_bw / dirty_rate). + * Hence, to calculate "step" properly, we have to use bdi_dirty as + * "dirty" and bdi_setpoint as "setpoint". + * + * We rampup dirty_ratelimit forcibly if bdi_dirty is low because + * it's possible that bdi_thresh is close to zero due to inactivity + * of backing device (see the implementation of bdi_dirty_limit()). + */ + if (unlikely(bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) { + dirty = bdi_dirty; + if (bdi_dirty < 8) + setpoint = bdi_dirty + 1; + else + setpoint = (bdi_thresh + + bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, bg_thresh)) / 2; + } + if (dirty < setpoint) { x = min(bdi->balanced_dirty_ratelimit, min(balanced_dirty_ratelimit, task_ratelimit)); @@ -1198,6 +1304,56 @@ static long bdi_min_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, return pages >= DIRTY_POLL_THRESH ? 1 + t / 2 : t; } +static inline void bdi_dirty_limits(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, + unsigned long dirty_thresh, + unsigned long background_thresh, + unsigned long *bdi_dirty, + unsigned long *bdi_thresh, + unsigned long *bdi_bg_thresh) +{ + unsigned long bdi_reclaimable; + + /* + * bdi_thresh is not treated as some limiting factor as + * dirty_thresh, due to reasons + * - in JBOD setup, bdi_thresh can fluctuate a lot + * - in a system with HDD and USB key, the USB key may somehow + * go into state (bdi_dirty >> bdi_thresh) either because + * bdi_dirty starts high, or because bdi_thresh drops low. + * In this case we don't want to hard throttle the USB key + * dirtiers for 100 seconds until bdi_dirty drops under + * bdi_thresh. Instead the auxiliary bdi control line in + * bdi_position_ratio() will let the dirtier task progress + * at some rate <= (write_bw / 2) for bringing down bdi_dirty. + */ + *bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, dirty_thresh); + + if (bdi_bg_thresh) + *bdi_bg_thresh = div_u64((u64)*bdi_thresh * + background_thresh, + dirty_thresh); + + /* + * In order to avoid the stacked BDI deadlock we need + * to ensure we accurately count the 'dirty' pages when + * the threshold is low. + * + * Otherwise it would be possible to get thresh+n pages + * reported dirty, even though there are thresh-m pages + * actually dirty; with m+n sitting in the percpu + * deltas. + */ + if (*bdi_thresh < 2 * bdi_stat_error(bdi)) { + bdi_reclaimable = bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE); + *bdi_dirty = bdi_reclaimable + + bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK); + } else { + bdi_reclaimable = bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE); + *bdi_dirty = bdi_reclaimable + + bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK); + } +} + /* * balance_dirty_pages() must be called by processes which are generating dirty * data. It looks at the number of dirty pages in the machine and will force @@ -1209,13 +1365,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, unsigned long pages_dirtied) { unsigned long nr_reclaimable; /* = file_dirty + unstable_nfs */ - unsigned long bdi_reclaimable; unsigned long nr_dirty; /* = file_dirty + writeback + unstable_nfs */ - unsigned long bdi_dirty; - unsigned long freerun; unsigned long background_thresh; unsigned long dirty_thresh; - unsigned long bdi_thresh; long period; long pause; long max_pause; @@ -1226,10 +1378,16 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, unsigned long dirty_ratelimit; unsigned long pos_ratio; struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info; + bool strictlimit = bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT; unsigned long start_time = jiffies; for (;;) { unsigned long now = jiffies; + unsigned long uninitialized_var(bdi_thresh); + unsigned long thresh; + unsigned long uninitialized_var(bdi_dirty); + unsigned long dirty; + unsigned long bg_thresh; /* * Unstable writes are a feature of certain networked @@ -1243,61 +1401,44 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh); + if (unlikely(strictlimit)) { + bdi_dirty_limits(bdi, dirty_thresh, background_thresh, + &bdi_dirty, &bdi_thresh, &bg_thresh); + + dirty = bdi_dirty; + thresh = bdi_thresh; + } else { + dirty = nr_dirty; + thresh = dirty_thresh; + bg_thresh = background_thresh; + } + /* * Throttle it only when the background writeback cannot * catch-up. This avoids (excessively) small writeouts - * when the bdi limits are ramping up. + * when the bdi limits are ramping up in case of !strictlimit. + * + * In strictlimit case make decision based on the bdi counters + * and limits. Small writeouts when the bdi limits are ramping + * up are the price we consciously pay for strictlimit-ing. */ - freerun = dirty_freerun_ceiling(dirty_thresh, - background_thresh); - if (nr_dirty <= freerun) { + if (dirty <= dirty_freerun_ceiling(thresh, bg_thresh)) { current->dirty_paused_when = now; current->nr_dirtied = 0; current->nr_dirtied_pause = - dirty_poll_interval(nr_dirty, dirty_thresh); + dirty_poll_interval(dirty, thresh); break; } if (unlikely(!writeback_in_progress(bdi))) bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi); - /* - * bdi_thresh is not treated as some limiting factor as - * dirty_thresh, due to reasons - * - in JBOD setup, bdi_thresh can fluctuate a lot - * - in a system with HDD and USB key, the USB key may somehow - * go into state (bdi_dirty >> bdi_thresh) either because - * bdi_dirty starts high, or because bdi_thresh drops low. - * In this case we don't want to hard throttle the USB key - * dirtiers for 100 seconds until bdi_dirty drops under - * bdi_thresh. Instead the auxiliary bdi control line in - * bdi_position_ratio() will let the dirtier task progress - * at some rate <= (write_bw / 2) for bringing down bdi_dirty. - */ - bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, dirty_thresh); - - /* - * In order to avoid the stacked BDI deadlock we need - * to ensure we accurately count the 'dirty' pages when - * the threshold is low. - * - * Otherwise it would be possible to get thresh+n pages - * reported dirty, even though there are thresh-m pages - * actually dirty; with m+n sitting in the percpu - * deltas. - */ - if (bdi_thresh < 2 * bdi_stat_error(bdi)) { - bdi_reclaimable = bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE); - bdi_dirty = bdi_reclaimable + - bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK); - } else { - bdi_reclaimable = bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE); - bdi_dirty = bdi_reclaimable + - bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK); - } + if (!strictlimit) + bdi_dirty_limits(bdi, dirty_thresh, background_thresh, + &bdi_dirty, &bdi_thresh, NULL); dirty_exceeded = (bdi_dirty > bdi_thresh) && - (nr_dirty > dirty_thresh); + ((nr_dirty > dirty_thresh) || strictlimit); if (dirty_exceeded && !bdi->dirty_exceeded) bdi->dirty_exceeded = 1; |