aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sound/soc/soc-core.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>2011-05-25 14:06:41 -0600
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>2011-12-21 12:57:48 -0800
commitc4e133f4e253b57e5d4409964a3b51f2d887e94b (patch)
treef7d96d1e5d7ba32e921e1b30824f6a4882762db5 /sound/soc/soc-core.c
parent5dfcd4d5e36784b14071bbe5e42947d3e8bf1c69 (diff)
ASoC: core: Don't schedule deferred_resume_work twice
commit 82e14e8bdd88b69018fe757192b01dd98582905e upstream. For cards that have two or more DAIs, snd_soc_resume's loop over all DAIs ends up calling schedule_work(deferred_resume_work) once per DAI. Since this is the same work item each time, the 2nd and subsequent calls return 0 (work item already queued), and trigger the dev_err message below stating that a work item may have been lost. Solve this by adjusting the loop to simply calculate whether to run the resume work immediately or defer it, and then call schedule work (or not) one time based on that. Note: This has not been tested in mainline, but only in chromeos-2.6.38; mainline doesn't support suspend/resume on Tegra, nor does the mainline Tegra ASoC driver contain multiple DAIs. It has been compile-checked in mainline. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'sound/soc/soc-core.c')
-rw-r--r--sound/soc/soc-core.c19
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index 59abd842c2c..493ae7c4c04 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static void soc_resume_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
int snd_soc_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct snd_soc_card *card = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- int i;
+ int i, ac97_control = 0;
/* AC97 devices might have other drivers hanging off them so
* need to resume immediately. Other drivers don't have that
@@ -1266,14 +1266,15 @@ int snd_soc_resume(struct device *dev)
*/
for (i = 0; i < card->num_rtd; i++) {
struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai = card->rtd[i].cpu_dai;
- if (cpu_dai->driver->ac97_control) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "Resuming AC97 immediately\n");
- soc_resume_deferred(&card->deferred_resume_work);
- } else {
- dev_dbg(dev, "Scheduling resume work\n");
- if (!schedule_work(&card->deferred_resume_work))
- dev_err(dev, "resume work item may be lost\n");
- }
+ ac97_control |= cpu_dai->driver->ac97_control;
+ }
+ if (ac97_control) {
+ dev_dbg(dev, "Resuming AC97 immediately\n");
+ soc_resume_deferred(&card->deferred_resume_work);
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(dev, "Scheduling resume work\n");
+ if (!schedule_work(&card->deferred_resume_work))
+ dev_err(dev, "resume work item may be lost\n");
}
return 0;