[PATCH] selinux: Reduce memory use by avtab

This patch improves memory use by SELinux by both reducing the avtab node
size and reducing the number of avtab nodes.  The memory savings are
substantial, e.g.  on a 64-bit system after boot, James Morris reported the
following data for the targeted and strict policies:

            #objs  objsize   kernmem
Targeted:
  Before:  237888       40     9.1MB
  After:    19968       24     468KB

Strict:
  Before:  571680       40   21.81MB
  After:   221052       24    5.06MB

The improvement in memory use comes at a cost in the speed of security
server computations of access vectors, but these computations are only
required on AVC cache misses, and performance measurements by James Morris
using a number of benchmarks have shown that the change does not cause any
significant degradation.

Note that a rebuilt policy via an updated policy toolchain
(libsepol/checkpolicy) is required in order to gain the full benefits of
this patch, although some memory savings benefits are immediately applied
even to older policies (in particular, the reduction in avtab node size).
Sources for the updated toolchain are presently available from the
sourceforge CVS tree (http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=21266), and
tarballs are available from http://www.flux.utah.edu/~sds.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 114 insertions, 91 deletions

diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
index e2057f5a411..b81cd668897 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c
@@ -100,18 +100,18 @@ int evaluate_cond_node(struct policydb *p, struct cond_node *node)
 		/* turn the rules on or off */
 		for (cur = node->true_list; cur != NULL; cur = cur->next) {
 			if (new_state <= 0) {
-				cur->node->datum.specified &= ~AVTAB_ENABLED;
+				cur->node->key.specified &= ~AVTAB_ENABLED;
 			} else {
-				cur->node->datum.specified |= AVTAB_ENABLED;
+				cur->node->key.specified |= AVTAB_ENABLED;
 			}
 		}
 
 		for (cur = node->false_list; cur != NULL; cur = cur->next) {
 			/* -1 or 1 */
 			if (new_state) {
-				cur->node->datum.specified &= ~AVTAB_ENABLED;
+				cur->node->key.specified &= ~AVTAB_ENABLED;
 			} else {
-				cur->node->datum.specified |= AVTAB_ENABLED;
+				cur->node->key.specified |= AVTAB_ENABLED;
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -252,104 +252,126 @@ err:
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static int cond_read_av_list(struct policydb *p, void *fp, struct cond_av_list **ret_list,
-			     struct cond_av_list *other)
+struct cond_insertf_data
 {
-	struct cond_av_list *list, *last = NULL, *cur;
-	struct avtab_key key;
-	struct avtab_datum datum;
+	struct policydb *p;
+	struct cond_av_list *other;
+	struct cond_av_list *head;
+	struct cond_av_list *tail;
+};
+
+static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum *d, void *ptr)
+{
+	struct cond_insertf_data *data = ptr;
+	struct policydb *p = data->p;
+	struct cond_av_list *other = data->other, *list, *cur;
 	struct avtab_node *node_ptr;
-	int rc;
-	u32 buf[1], i, len;
 	u8 found;
 
-	*ret_list = NULL;
-
-	len = 0;
-	rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof buf);
-	if (rc < 0)
-		return -1;
-
-	len = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
-	if (len == 0) {
-		return 0;
-	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
-		if (avtab_read_item(fp, &datum, &key))
+	/*
+	 * For type rules we have to make certain there aren't any
+	 * conflicting rules by searching the te_avtab and the
+	 * cond_te_avtab.
+	 */
+	if (k->specified & AVTAB_TYPE) {
+		if (avtab_search(&p->te_avtab, k)) {
+			printk("security: type rule already exists outside of a conditional.");
 			goto err;
-
+		}
 		/*
-		 * For type rules we have to make certain there aren't any
-		 * conflicting rules by searching the te_avtab and the
-		 * cond_te_avtab.
+		 * If we are reading the false list other will be a pointer to
+		 * the true list. We can have duplicate entries if there is only
+		 * 1 other entry and it is in our true list.
+		 *
+		 * If we are reading the true list (other == NULL) there shouldn't
+		 * be any other entries.
 		 */
-		if (datum.specified & AVTAB_TYPE) {
-			if (avtab_search(&p->te_avtab, &key, AVTAB_TYPE)) {
-				printk("security: type rule already exists outside of a conditional.");
-				goto err;
-			}
-			/*
-			 * If we are reading the false list other will be a pointer to
-			 * the true list. We can have duplicate entries if there is only
-			 * 1 other entry and it is in our true list.
-			 *
-			 * If we are reading the true list (other == NULL) there shouldn't
-			 * be any other entries.
-			 */
-			if (other) {
-				node_ptr = avtab_search_node(&p->te_cond_avtab, &key, AVTAB_TYPE);
-				if (node_ptr) {
-					if (avtab_search_node_next(node_ptr, AVTAB_TYPE)) {
-						printk("security: too many conflicting type rules.");
-						goto err;
-					}
-					found = 0;
-					for (cur = other; cur != NULL; cur = cur->next) {
-						if (cur->node == node_ptr) {
-							found = 1;
-							break;
-						}
-					}
-					if (!found) {
-						printk("security: conflicting type rules.");
-						goto err;
+		if (other) {
+			node_ptr = avtab_search_node(&p->te_cond_avtab, k);
+			if (node_ptr) {
+				if (avtab_search_node_next(node_ptr, k->specified)) {
+					printk("security: too many conflicting type rules.");
+					goto err;
+				}
+				found = 0;
+				for (cur = other; cur != NULL; cur = cur->next) {
+					if (cur->node == node_ptr) {
+						found = 1;
+						break;
 					}
 				}
-			} else {
-				if (avtab_search(&p->te_cond_avtab, &key, AVTAB_TYPE)) {
-					printk("security: conflicting type rules when adding type rule for true.");
+				if (!found) {
+					printk("security: conflicting type rules.\n");
 					goto err;
 				}
 			}
+		} else {
+			if (avtab_search(&p->te_cond_avtab, k)) {
+				printk("security: conflicting type rules when adding type rule for true.\n");
+				goto err;
+			}
 		}
-		node_ptr = avtab_insert_nonunique(&p->te_cond_avtab, &key, &datum);
-		if (!node_ptr) {
-			printk("security: could not insert rule.");
-			goto err;
-		}
-
-		list = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cond_av_list), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!list)
-			goto err;
-		memset(list, 0, sizeof(struct cond_av_list));
-
-		list->node = node_ptr;
-		if (i == 0)
-			*ret_list = list;
-		else
-			last->next = list;
-		last = list;
+	}
 
+	node_ptr = avtab_insert_nonunique(&p->te_cond_avtab, k, d);
+	if (!node_ptr) {
+		printk("security: could not insert rule.");
+		goto err;
 	}
 
+	list = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cond_av_list), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!list)
+		goto err;
+	memset(list, 0, sizeof(*list));
+
+	list->node = node_ptr;
+	if (!data->head)
+		data->head = list;
+	else
+		data->tail->next = list;
+	data->tail = list;
 	return 0;
+
 err:
-	cond_av_list_destroy(*ret_list);
-	*ret_list = NULL;
+	cond_av_list_destroy(data->head);
+	data->head = NULL;
 	return -1;
 }
 
+static int cond_read_av_list(struct policydb *p, void *fp, struct cond_av_list **ret_list, struct cond_av_list *other)
+{
+	int i, rc;
+	u32 buf[1], len;
+	struct cond_insertf_data data;
+
+	*ret_list = NULL;
+
+	len = 0;
+	rc = next_entry(buf, fp, sizeof(u32));
+	if (rc < 0)
+		return -1;
+
+	len = le32_to_cpu(buf[0]);
+	if (len == 0) {
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	data.p = p;
+	data.other = other;
+	data.head = NULL;
+	data.tail = NULL;
+	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+		rc = avtab_read_item(fp, p->policyvers, &p->te_cond_avtab, cond_insertf, &data);
+		if (rc)
+			return rc;
+
+	}
+
+	*ret_list = data.head;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int expr_isvalid(struct policydb *p, struct cond_expr *expr)
 {
 	if (expr->expr_type <= 0 || expr->expr_type > COND_LAST) {
@@ -452,6 +474,7 @@ int cond_read_list(struct policydb *p, void *fp)
 	return 0;
 err:
 	cond_list_destroy(p->cond_list);
+	p->cond_list = NULL;
 	return -1;
 }
 
@@ -465,22 +488,22 @@ void cond_compute_av(struct avtab *ctab, struct avtab_key *key, struct av_decisi
 	if(!ctab || !key || !avd)
 		return;
 
-	for(node = avtab_search_node(ctab, key, AVTAB_AV); node != NULL;
-				node = avtab_search_node_next(node, AVTAB_AV)) {
-		if ( (__u32) (AVTAB_ALLOWED|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
-		     (node->datum.specified & (AVTAB_ALLOWED|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
-			avd->allowed |= avtab_allowed(&node->datum);
-		if ( (__u32) (AVTAB_AUDITDENY|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
-		     (node->datum.specified & (AVTAB_AUDITDENY|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
+	for(node = avtab_search_node(ctab, key); node != NULL;
+				node = avtab_search_node_next(node, key->specified)) {
+		if ( (u16) (AVTAB_ALLOWED|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
+		     (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_ALLOWED|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
+			avd->allowed |= node->datum.data;
+		if ( (u16) (AVTAB_AUDITDENY|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
+		     (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_AUDITDENY|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
 			/* Since a '0' in an auditdeny mask represents a
 			 * permission we do NOT want to audit (dontaudit), we use
 			 * the '&' operand to ensure that all '0's in the mask
 			 * are retained (much unlike the allow and auditallow cases).
 			 */
-			avd->auditdeny &= avtab_auditdeny(&node->datum);
-		if ( (__u32) (AVTAB_AUDITALLOW|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
-		     (node->datum.specified & (AVTAB_AUDITALLOW|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
-			avd->auditallow |= avtab_auditallow(&node->datum);
+			avd->auditdeny &= node->datum.data;
+		if ( (u16) (AVTAB_AUDITALLOW|AVTAB_ENABLED) ==
+		     (node->key.specified & (AVTAB_AUDITALLOW|AVTAB_ENABLED)))
+			avd->auditallow |= node->datum.data;
 	}
 	return;
 }