diff options
author | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> | 2008-08-14 11:37:28 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> | 2008-08-14 22:59:43 +1000 |
commit | 5cd9c58fbe9ec92b45b27e131719af4f2bd9eb40 (patch) | |
tree | 8573db001b4dc3c2ad97102dda42b841c40b5f6c /security/selinux/hooks.c | |
parent | 8d0968abd03ec6b407df117adc773562386702fa (diff) |
security: Fix setting of PF_SUPERPRIV by __capable()
Fix the setting of PF_SUPERPRIV by __capable() as it could corrupt the flags
the target process if that is not the current process and it is trying to
change its own flags in a different way at the same time.
__capable() is using neither atomic ops nor locking to protect t->flags. This
patch removes __capable() and introduces has_capability() that doesn't set
PF_SUPERPRIV on the process being queried.
This patch further splits security_ptrace() in two:
(1) security_ptrace_may_access(). This passes judgement on whether one
process may access another only (PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH for ptrace() and
PTRACE_MODE_READ for /proc), and takes a pointer to the child process.
current is the parent.
(2) security_ptrace_traceme(). This passes judgement on PTRACE_TRACEME only,
and takes only a pointer to the parent process. current is the child.
In Smack and commoncap, this uses has_capability() to determine whether
the parent will be permitted to use PTRACE_ATTACH if normal checks fail.
This does not set PF_SUPERPRIV.
Two of the instances of __capable() actually only act on current, and so have
been changed to calls to capable().
Of the places that were using __capable():
(1) The OOM killer calls __capable() thrice when weighing the killability of a
process. All of these now use has_capability().
(2) cap_ptrace() and smack_ptrace() were using __capable() to check to see
whether the parent was allowed to trace any process. As mentioned above,
these have been split. For PTRACE_ATTACH and /proc, capable() is now
used, and for PTRACE_TRACEME, has_capability() is used.
(3) cap_safe_nice() only ever saw current, so now uses capable().
(4) smack_setprocattr() rejected accesses to tasks other than current just
after calling __capable(), so the order of these two tests have been
switched and capable() is used instead.
(5) In smack_file_send_sigiotask(), we need to allow privileged processes to
receive SIGIO on files they're manipulating.
(6) In smack_task_wait(), we let a process wait for a privileged process,
whether or not the process doing the waiting is privileged.
I've tested this with the LTP SELinux and syscalls testscripts.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Acked-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/selinux/hooks.c')
-rw-r--r-- | security/selinux/hooks.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index 3ae9bec5a50..03fc6a81ae3 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -1738,24 +1738,34 @@ static inline u32 file_to_av(struct file *file) /* Hook functions begin here. */ -static int selinux_ptrace(struct task_struct *parent, - struct task_struct *child, - unsigned int mode) +static int selinux_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child, + unsigned int mode) { int rc; - rc = secondary_ops->ptrace(parent, child, mode); + rc = secondary_ops->ptrace_may_access(child, mode); if (rc) return rc; if (mode == PTRACE_MODE_READ) { - struct task_security_struct *tsec = parent->security; + struct task_security_struct *tsec = current->security; struct task_security_struct *csec = child->security; return avc_has_perm(tsec->sid, csec->sid, SECCLASS_FILE, FILE__READ, NULL); } - return task_has_perm(parent, child, PROCESS__PTRACE); + return task_has_perm(current, child, PROCESS__PTRACE); +} + +static int selinux_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent) +{ + int rc; + + rc = secondary_ops->ptrace_traceme(parent); + if (rc) + return rc; + + return task_has_perm(parent, current, PROCESS__PTRACE); } static int selinux_capget(struct task_struct *target, kernel_cap_t *effective, @@ -5346,7 +5356,8 @@ static int selinux_key_getsecurity(struct key *key, char **_buffer) static struct security_operations selinux_ops = { .name = "selinux", - .ptrace = selinux_ptrace, + .ptrace_may_access = selinux_ptrace_may_access, + .ptrace_traceme = selinux_ptrace_traceme, .capget = selinux_capget, .capset_check = selinux_capset_check, .capset_set = selinux_capset_set, |