diff options
| author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2012-02-29 05:56:21 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2012-03-01 10:53:18 +0100 |
| commit | 847854f5988a04fe7e02d2fdd4fa0df9f96360fe (patch) | |
| tree | c1c1e4de2f0221b63d359961e54d2977d90b9536 /mm | |
| parent | 88ebdda6159ffc15699f204c33feb3e431bf9bdc (diff) | |
memblock: Fix size aligning of memblock_alloc_base_nid()
memblock allocator aligns @size to @align to reduce the amount
of fragmentation. Commit:
7bd0b0f0da ("memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator")
Broke it by incorrectly relocating @size aligning to
memblock_find_in_range_node(). As the aligned size is not
propagated back to memblock_alloc_base_nid(), the actually
reserved size isn't aligned.
While this increases memory use for memblock reserved array,
this shouldn't cause any critical failure; however, it seems
that the size aligning was hiding a use-beyond-allocation bug in
sparc64 and losing the aligning causes boot failure.
The underlying problem is currently being debugged but this is a
proper fix in itself, it's already pretty late in -rc cycle for
boot failures and reverting the change for debugging isn't
difficult. Restore the size aligning moving it to
memblock_alloc_base_nid().
Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120228205621.GC3252@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1202130942030.1488@math.ut.ee>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memblock.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 77b5f227e1d..99f28559950 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -99,9 +99,6 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t this_start, this_end, cand; u64 i; - /* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */ - size = round_up(size, align); - /* pump up @end */ if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE) end = memblock.current_limit; @@ -731,6 +728,9 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size, { phys_addr_t found; + /* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */ + size = round_up(size, align); + found = memblock_find_in_range_node(0, max_addr, size, align, nid); if (found && !memblock_reserve(found, size)) return found; |