aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>2010-09-22 13:04:52 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2010-09-22 17:22:38 -0700
commitf19e8aa11afa24036c6273428da51949b5acf30c (patch)
treee768541c3b83ffe488119f77ef178cdf97f9bece /mm
parent767b68e96993e29e3480d7ecdd9c4b84667c5762 (diff)
oom: always return a badness score of non-zero for eligible tasks
A task's badness score is roughly a proportion of its rss and swap compared to the system's capacity. The scale ranges from 0 to 1000 with the highest score chosen for kill. Thus, this scale operates on a resolution of 0.1% of RAM + swap. Admin tasks are also given a 3% bonus, so the badness score of an admin task using 3% of memory, for example, would still be 0. It's possible that an exceptionally large number of tasks will combine to exhaust all resources but never have a single task that uses more than 0.1% of RAM and swap (or 3.0% for admin tasks). This patch ensures that the badness score of any eligible task is never 0 so the machine doesn't unnecessarily panic because it cannot find a task to kill. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/oom_kill.c9
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index fc81cb22869..859250c7dc0 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -208,8 +208,13 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
*/
points += p->signal->oom_score_adj;
- if (points < 0)
- return 0;
+ /*
+ * Never return 0 for an eligible task that may be killed since it's
+ * possible that no single user task uses more than 0.1% of memory and
+ * no single admin tasks uses more than 3.0%.
+ */
+ if (points <= 0)
+ return 1;
return (points < 1000) ? points : 1000;
}